Honor 200 Pro vs Vivo X300 Pro

The Honor 200 Pro (2024) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3, while the Vivo X300 Pro (2025) runs on the Dimensity 9500; launch prices were $700 and $899. By overall MobileRank rating, the Vivo X300 Pro leads — 88/100 vs 74/100 (a 14-point difference). Key differences: the Vivo X300 Pro has the bigger battery (6510 mAh vs 5200); the main camera is 50 MP vs 200 MP; the Vivo X300 Pro is faster in AnTuTu (3,326,259 vs 1,698,060); per DXOMark lab testing, the Vivo X300 Pro has the stronger camera (171 vs 137); the Honor 200 Pro is noticeably lighter (199g vs 226g).

The Vivo X300 Pro is noticeably better than the Honor 200 Pro — the overall rating gap is 14 points.

Profile comparison

Category scores

Honor 200 Pro

Performance 75
Display 83
Camera 70
Battery 80
Portability 57
Value for money 62

Vivo X300 Pro

Performance 94
Display 84
Camera 96
Battery 81
Portability 43
Value for money 88

What makes Honor 200 Pro better?

  • Faster charging: 100W vs 90W
  • Faster wireless charging: 66W vs 40W
  • Lighter: 199g vs 226g
  • Cheaper at launch: $700 vs $899

  • Better portability (57/100 vs 43/100)

What makes Vivo X300 Pro better?

  • Higher AnTuTu: 3326259 vs 1698060
  • Better Geekbench Single: 3293 vs 1923
  • Better Geekbench Multi: 10243 vs 5179
  • Bigger battery: 6510 vs 5200 mAh
  • Better main camera: 200MP vs 50MP

  • Higher performance (94/100 vs 75/100)
  • Better camera (96/100 vs 70/100)
  • Longer battery life (81/100 vs 80/100)
  • Better display (84/100 vs 83/100)

Comparison verdict

Comparing the Honor 200 Pro vs the Vivo X300 Pro, the Vivo X300 Pro scores 14 points higher (88/100 vs 74/100). In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 Pro leads (94/100 vs 75/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Pro leads (96/100 vs 70/100). Value score: Honor 200 Pro — 62/100, Vivo X300 Pro — 88/100; it shows how far a model sits above or below the usual level for its price, and is not part of the overall rating. In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 Pro notably outperforms the Honor 200 Pro (94/100 vs 75/100). In the "display" category, the Vivo X300 Pro and the Honor 200 Pro are nearly equal (84/100 vs 83/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Pro notably outperforms the Honor 200 Pro (96/100 vs 70/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Pro and the Honor 200 Pro are nearly equal (81/100 vs 80/100). In the "portability" category, the Honor 200 Pro is a bit better (57/100 vs 43/100).

Honor 200 Pro: The Honor 200 Pro is a better fit for active users, those who care about battery life.
Vivo X300 Pro: The Vivo X300 Pro is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.

Specs comparison

Specification Honor 200 Pro Vivo X300 Pro
Processor Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3 Dimensity 9500
AnTuTu 1698060 3326259
Geekbench Single 1923 3293
Geekbench Multi 5179 10243
Display 6.8" OLED 6.8" AMOLED
Resolution 1224x2700 1260x2800
Refresh rate 120 Hz 120 Hz
Battery 5200 mAh 6510 mAh
Charging 100W 90W
Wireless charging 66W 40W
DXOMark (camera) 137 171
Main camera 50 MP 200 MP
Ultrawide 12 MP 50 MP
Telephoto 50 MP 50 MP
Front camera 50 MP 32 MP
RAM 12GB / 16GB 12GB / 16GB
Storage 256GB / 512GB / 1TB 256GB / 512GB / 1TB
OS Android 14, up to 4 major Android upgrades, MagicOS 8 Android 16
Brightness (peak) 4000 nits 4500 nits
NFC yes yes
Protection IP65 IP68
Dimensions 163.3×75.2×8.2 mm 161.2×75.5×8.0 mm
Weight 199 g 226 g
Launch price $700 $899

Camera comparison

Honor 200 Pro

  • Main: 50MP f/1.9
  • Ultrawide: 12MP
  • Telephoto: 50MP
  • Front: 50MP
70
camera

Vivo X300 Pro

  • Main: 200MP f/1.57
  • Ultrawide: 50MP
  • Telephoto: 50MP
  • Front: 32MP
96
camera

Display comparison

Honor 200 Pro

  • 6.8" OLED
  • Resolution: 1224x2700
  • Refresh rate: 120 Hz
83
display

Vivo X300 Pro

  • 6.8" AMOLED
  • Resolution: 1260x2800
  • Refresh rate: 120 Hz
84
display

Battery and charging

Honor 200 Pro

  • 5200 mAh
  • Wired: 100W
  • Wireless: 66W
80
battery

Vivo X300 Pro

  • 6510 mAh
  • NanoReview test: web browsing 13:30 hrs, total 24:37 hrs
  • Wired: 90W
  • Wireless: 40W
81
battery

Overall performance score

We compared Honor 200 Pro and Vivo X300 Pro, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.

Honor 200 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3
74/100
1698060 AnTuTu
Vivo X300 Pro Dimensity 9500
88/100 +48.9%
3326259 AnTuTu

Vivo X300 Pro leads Honor 200 Pro by 48.9% in our overall performance rating.

Benchmarks

Launch prices and where to check today's

Honor 200 Pro

$700

Vivo X300 Pro

$899

Launch price difference: $199. Honor 200 Pro was $199 cheaper at launch.

Detailed category analysis

performance

In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 Pro notably outperforms the Honor 200 Pro (94/100 vs 75/100).

display

In the "display" category, the Vivo X300 Pro and the Honor 200 Pro are nearly equal (84/100 vs 83/100).

camera

In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Pro notably outperforms the Honor 200 Pro (96/100 vs 70/100).

battery

In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Pro and the Honor 200 Pro are nearly equal (81/100 vs 80/100).

portability

In the "portability" category, the Honor 200 Pro is a bit better (57/100 vs 43/100).

Frequently asked questions

Which is better: the Honor 200 Pro or the Vivo X300 Pro?

The Vivo X300 Pro is noticeably better than the Honor 200 Pro — the overall rating gap is 14 points.

What is the rating of the Honor 200 Pro and the Vivo X300 Pro?

The Honor 200 Pro has a MobileRank rating of 74/100, the Vivo X300 Pro — 88/100.

Which has the better camera: the Honor 200 Pro or the Vivo X300 Pro?

The Vivo X300 Pro leads on camera score (96/100 vs 70/100).

Which is more powerful: the Honor 200 Pro or the Vivo X300 Pro?

The Vivo X300 Pro leads on performance (94/100 vs 75/100).

Should you choose the Honor 200 Pro over the Vivo X300 Pro?

The Honor 200 Pro is a better fit for active users, those who care about battery life. The Vivo X300 Pro is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.