Honor 200 Pro vs Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra

The Honor 200 Pro (2024) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3, while the Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra (2026) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5; launch prices were $700 and $799. By overall MobileRank rating, the Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra leads — 89/100 vs 74/100 (a 15-point difference). Key differences: the Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra has the bigger battery (7400 mAh vs 5200); the Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra is faster in AnTuTu (4,602,290 vs 1,698,060); the Honor 200 Pro is noticeably lighter (199g vs 227g).

The Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra is noticeably better than the Honor 200 Pro — the overall rating gap is 15 points.

Profile comparison

Category scores

Honor 200 Pro

Performance 75
Display 83
Camera 70
Battery 80
Portability 57
Value for money 62

Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra

Performance 99
Display 99
Camera 78
Battery 92
Portability 35
Value for money 92

What makes Honor 200 Pro better?

  • Faster wireless charging: 66W vs 50W
  • Lighter: 199g vs 227g
  • Cheaper at launch: $700 vs $799

  • Better portability (57/100 vs 35/100)

What makes Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra better?

  • Higher AnTuTu: 4602290 vs 1698060
  • Better Geekbench Single: 3639 vs 1923
  • Better Geekbench Multi: 11047 vs 5179
  • Bigger battery: 7400 vs 5200 mAh
  • Faster charging: 120W vs 100W
  • Higher refresh rate: 144Hz vs 120Hz

  • Higher performance (99/100 vs 75/100)
  • Better camera (78/100 vs 70/100)
  • Longer battery life (92/100 vs 80/100)
  • Better display (99/100 vs 83/100)

Comparison verdict

Comparing the Honor 200 Pro vs the Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra, the Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra scores 15 points higher (89/100 vs 74/100). In the "performance" category, the Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra leads (99/100 vs 75/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra leads (92/100 vs 80/100). Value score: Honor 200 Pro — 62/100, Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra — 92/100; it shows how far a model sits above or below the usual level for its price, and is not part of the overall rating. In the "performance" category, the Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra notably outperforms the Honor 200 Pro (99/100 vs 75/100). In the "display" category, the Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra notably outperforms the Honor 200 Pro (99/100 vs 83/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra is a bit better (78/100 vs 70/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra is a bit better (92/100 vs 80/100). In the "portability" category, the Honor 200 Pro notably outperforms the Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra (57/100 vs 35/100).

Honor 200 Pro: The Honor 200 Pro is a better fit for active users, those who care about battery life.
Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra: The Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra is a better fit for gamers and power users, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.

Specs comparison

Specification Honor 200 Pro Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra
Processor Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5
AnTuTu 1698060 4602290
Geekbench Single 1923 3639
Geekbench Multi 5179 11047
Display 6.8" OLED 6.8" LTPO AMOLED
Resolution 1224x2700 1440x3168
Refresh rate 120 Hz 144 Hz
Battery 5200 mAh 7400 mAh
Charging 100W 120W
Wireless charging 66W 50W
DXOMark (camera) 137 —
Main camera 50 MP 50 MP
Ultrawide 12 MP 50 MP
Telephoto 50 MP 50 MP
Front camera 50 MP 32 MP
RAM 12GB / 16GB 12GB / 16GB / 24GB
Storage 256GB / 512GB / 1TB 256GB / 512GB / 1TB
OS Android 14, up to 4 major Android upgrades, MagicOS 8 Android 16
Brightness (peak) 4000 nits 8000 nits
NFC yes yes
Protection IP65 IP68
Dimensions 163.3×75.2×8.2 mm 163.7×76.8×8.7 mm
Weight 199 g 227 g
Launch price $700 $799

Camera comparison

Honor 200 Pro

  • Main: 50MP f/1.9
  • Ultrawide: 12MP
  • Telephoto: 50MP
  • Front: 50MP
70
camera

Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra

  • Main: 50MP f/1.9
  • Ultrawide: 50MP
  • Telephoto: 50MP
  • Front: 32MP
78
camera

Display comparison

Honor 200 Pro

  • 6.8" OLED
  • Resolution: 1224x2700
  • Refresh rate: 120 Hz
83
display

Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra

  • 6.8" LTPO AMOLED
  • Resolution: 1440x3168
  • Refresh rate: 144 Hz
99
display

Battery and charging

Honor 200 Pro

  • 5200 mAh
  • Wired: 100W
  • Wireless: 66W
80
battery

Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra

  • 7400 mAh
  • Wired: 120W
  • Wireless: 50W
92
battery

Overall performance score

We compared Honor 200 Pro and Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.

Honor 200 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3
74/100
1698060 AnTuTu
Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5
89/100 +63.1%
4602290 AnTuTu

Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra leads Honor 200 Pro by 63.1% in our overall performance rating.

Benchmarks

Launch prices and where to check today's

Honor 200 Pro

$700

Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra

$799

Launch price difference: $99. Honor 200 Pro was $99 cheaper at launch.

Detailed category analysis

performance

In the "performance" category, the Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra notably outperforms the Honor 200 Pro (99/100 vs 75/100).

display

In the "display" category, the Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra notably outperforms the Honor 200 Pro (99/100 vs 83/100).

camera

In the "camera" category, the Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra is a bit better (78/100 vs 70/100).

battery

In the "battery" category, the Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra is a bit better (92/100 vs 80/100).

portability

In the "portability" category, the Honor 200 Pro notably outperforms the Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra (57/100 vs 35/100).

Frequently asked questions

Which is better: the Honor 200 Pro or the Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra?

The Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra is noticeably better than the Honor 200 Pro — the overall rating gap is 15 points.

What is the rating of the Honor 200 Pro and the Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra?

The Honor 200 Pro has a MobileRank rating of 74/100, the Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra — 89/100.

Which has the better camera: the Honor 200 Pro or the Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra?

The Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra leads on camera score (78/100 vs 70/100).

Which is more powerful: the Honor 200 Pro or the Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra?

The Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra leads on performance (99/100 vs 75/100).

Should you choose the Honor 200 Pro over the Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra?

The Honor 200 Pro is a better fit for active users, those who care about battery life. The Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra is a better fit for gamers and power users, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.