Honor 200 Pro vs Vivo iQOO 16
The Honor 200 Pro (2024) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3, while the Vivo iQOO 16 (2026) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Extreme Gen 6; launch prices were $700 and $840. By overall MobileRank rating, the Vivo iQOO 16 leads — 89/100 vs 74/100 (a 15-point difference). Key differences: the Vivo iQOO 16 has the bigger battery (8400 mAh vs 5200); the Vivo iQOO 16 is faster in AnTuTu (5,498,720 vs 1,698,060); the Honor 200 Pro is noticeably lighter (199g vs 223g).
Profile comparison
Category scores
Honor 200 Pro
Vivo iQOO 16
What makes Honor 200 Pro better?
- Faster wireless charging: 66W vs 40W
- Lighter: 199g vs 223g
- Cheaper at launch: $700 vs $840
- Better portability (57/100 vs 42/100)
What makes Vivo iQOO 16 better?
- Higher AnTuTu: 5498720 vs 1698060
- Better Geekbench Single: 4327 vs 1923
- Better Geekbench Multi: 12873 vs 5179
- Bigger battery: 8400 vs 5200 mAh
- Higher refresh rate: 165Hz vs 120Hz
- Higher performance (100/100 vs 75/100)
- Better camera (78/100 vs 70/100)
- Longer battery life (90/100 vs 80/100)
- Better display (99/100 vs 83/100)
Comparison verdict
Comparing the Honor 200 Pro vs the Vivo iQOO 16, the Vivo iQOO 16 scores 15 points higher (89/100 vs 74/100). In the "performance" category, the Vivo iQOO 16 leads (100/100 vs 75/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo iQOO 16 leads (90/100 vs 80/100). Value score: Honor 200 Pro — 62/100, Vivo iQOO 16 — 92/100; it shows how far a model sits above or below the usual level for its price, and is not part of the overall rating. In the "performance" category, the Vivo iQOO 16 notably outperforms the Honor 200 Pro (100/100 vs 75/100). In the "display" category, the Vivo iQOO 16 notably outperforms the Honor 200 Pro (99/100 vs 83/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo iQOO 16 is a bit better (78/100 vs 70/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo iQOO 16 is a bit better (90/100 vs 80/100). In the "portability" category, the Honor 200 Pro notably outperforms the Vivo iQOO 16 (57/100 vs 42/100).
Specs comparison
| Specification | Honor 200 Pro | Vivo iQOO 16 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3 | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Extreme Gen 6 | |
| AnTuTu | 1698060 | 5498720 | |
| Geekbench Single | 1923 | 4327 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 5179 | 12873 | |
| Display | 6.8" OLED | 6.8" AMOLED | |
| Resolution | 1224x2700 | 1440x3168 | |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 165 Hz | |
| Battery | 5200 mAh | 8400 mAh | |
| Charging | 100W | 100W | |
| Wireless charging | 66W | 40W | |
| DXOMark (camera) | 137 | — | |
| Main camera | 50 MP | 50 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 12 MP | 50 MP | |
| Telephoto | 50 MP | 50 MP | |
| Front camera | 50 MP | 32 MP | |
| RAM | 12GB / 16GB | 12GB / 16GB | |
| Storage | 256GB / 512GB / 1TB | 256GB / 512GB / 1TB | |
| OS | Android 14, up to 4 major Android upgrades, MagicOS 8 | Android 17 | |
| Brightness (peak) | 4000 nits | 6000 nits | |
| NFC | yes | yes | |
| Protection | IP65 | IP68/IP69 | |
| Dimensions | 163.3×75.2×8.2 mm | 163.8×76.9×8.3 mm | |
| Weight | 199 g | 223 g | |
| Launch price | $700 | $840 |
Camera comparison
Honor 200 Pro
- Main: 50MP f/1.9
- Ultrawide: 12MP
- Telephoto: 50MP
- Front: 50MP
Vivo iQOO 16
- Main: 50MP f/1.7
- Ultrawide: 50MP
- Telephoto: 50MP
- Front: 32MP
Display comparison
Honor 200 Pro
- 6.8" OLED
- Resolution: 1224x2700
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Vivo iQOO 16
- 6.8" AMOLED
- Resolution: 1440x3168
- Refresh rate: 165 Hz
Battery and charging
Honor 200 Pro
- 5200 mAh
- Wired: 100W
- Wireless: 66W
Vivo iQOO 16
- 8400 mAh
- Wired: 100W
- Wireless: 40W
Overall performance score
We compared Honor 200 Pro and Vivo iQOO 16, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Vivo iQOO 16 leads Honor 200 Pro by 69.1% in our overall performance rating.
Benchmarks
Launch prices and where to check today's
Launch price difference: $140. Honor 200 Pro was $140 cheaper at launch.
Detailed category analysis
performance
In the "performance" category, the Vivo iQOO 16 notably outperforms the Honor 200 Pro (100/100 vs 75/100).
display
In the "display" category, the Vivo iQOO 16 notably outperforms the Honor 200 Pro (99/100 vs 83/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the Vivo iQOO 16 is a bit better (78/100 vs 70/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Vivo iQOO 16 is a bit better (90/100 vs 80/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, the Honor 200 Pro notably outperforms the Vivo iQOO 16 (57/100 vs 42/100).
Frequently asked questions
Which is better: the Honor 200 Pro or the Vivo iQOO 16?
The Vivo iQOO 16 is noticeably better than the Honor 200 Pro — the overall rating gap is 15 points.
What is the rating of the Honor 200 Pro and the Vivo iQOO 16?
The Honor 200 Pro has a MobileRank rating of 74/100, the Vivo iQOO 16 — 89/100.
Which has the better camera: the Honor 200 Pro or the Vivo iQOO 16?
The Vivo iQOO 16 leads on camera score (78/100 vs 70/100).
Which is more powerful: the Honor 200 Pro or the Vivo iQOO 16?
The Vivo iQOO 16 leads on performance (100/100 vs 75/100).
Should you choose the Honor 200 Pro over the Vivo iQOO 16?
The Honor 200 Pro is a better fit for active users, those who care about battery life. The Vivo iQOO 16 is a better fit for gamers and power users, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.