Honor 200 Pro vs Motorola Razr Fold
The Honor 200 Pro (2024) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3, while the Motorola Razr Fold (2026) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 5; launch prices were $700 and $1799. By overall MobileRank rating, the Motorola Razr Fold leads — 83/100 vs 74/100 (a 9-point difference). Key differences: the Honor 200 Pro has the bigger battery (5200 mAh vs 5000); the Motorola Razr Fold is faster in AnTuTu (3,057,215 vs 1,698,060); per DXOMark lab testing, the Motorola Razr Fold has the stronger camera (164 vs 137); the Honor 200 Pro is noticeably lighter (199g vs 285g).
Profile comparison
Category scores
Honor 200 Pro
Motorola Razr Fold
What makes Honor 200 Pro better?
- Bigger battery: 5200 vs 5000 mAh
- Faster charging: 100W vs 68W
- Faster wireless charging: 66W vs 50W
- Lighter: 199g vs 285g
- Cheaper at launch: $700 vs $1799
- Longer battery life (80/100 vs 68/100)
- Better display (83/100 vs 81/100)
- Better portability (57/100 vs 52/100)
What makes Motorola Razr Fold better?
- Higher AnTuTu: 3057215 vs 1698060
- Better Geekbench Single: 2833 vs 1923
- Better Geekbench Multi: 9119 vs 5179
- Higher performance (90/100 vs 75/100)
- Better camera (91/100 vs 70/100)
Comparison verdict
Comparing the Honor 200 Pro vs the Motorola Razr Fold, the Motorola Razr Fold scores 9 points higher (83/100 vs 74/100). In the "performance" category, the Motorola Razr Fold leads (90/100 vs 75/100). In the "camera" category, the Motorola Razr Fold leads (91/100 vs 70/100). In the "battery" category, the Honor 200 Pro leads (80/100 vs 68/100). Value score: Honor 200 Pro — 62/100, Motorola Razr Fold — 74/100; it shows how far a model sits above or below the usual level for its price, and is not part of the overall rating. In the "performance" category, the Motorola Razr Fold notably outperforms the Honor 200 Pro (90/100 vs 75/100). In the "display" category, the Honor 200 Pro and the Motorola Razr Fold are nearly equal (83/100 vs 81/100). In the "camera" category, the Motorola Razr Fold notably outperforms the Honor 200 Pro (91/100 vs 70/100). In the "battery" category, the Honor 200 Pro is a bit better (80/100 vs 68/100). In the "portability" category, the Honor 200 Pro is a bit better (57/100 vs 52/100).
Specs comparison
| Specification | Honor 200 Pro | Motorola Razr Fold | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3 | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 5 | |
| AnTuTu | 1698060 | 3057215 | |
| Geekbench Single | 1923 | 2833 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 5179 | 9119 | |
| Display | 6.8" OLED | 8.1" LTPO AMOLED | |
| Resolution | 1224x2700 | 2480x2200 | |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz | |
| Battery | 5200 mAh | 5000 mAh | |
| Charging | 100W | 68W | |
| Wireless charging | 66W | 50W | |
| DXOMark (camera) | 137 | 164 | |
| Main camera | 50 MP | 50 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 12 MP | 50 MP | |
| Telephoto | 50 MP | 10 MP | |
| Front camera | 50 MP | 32 MP | |
| RAM | 12GB / 16GB | 12GB | |
| Storage | 256GB / 512GB / 1TB | 256GB / 512GB | |
| OS | Android 14, up to 4 major Android upgrades, MagicOS 8 | Android 16 | |
| Brightness (peak) | 4000 nits | 6200 nits | |
| NFC | yes | yes | |
| Protection | IP65 | IPX9 | |
| Dimensions | 163.3×75.2×8.2 mm | 160.1×144.5×4.7 mm | |
| Weight | 199 g | 285 g | |
| Launch price | $700 | $1799 |
Camera comparison
Honor 200 Pro
- Main: 50MP f/1.9
- Ultrawide: 12MP
- Telephoto: 50MP
- Front: 50MP
Motorola Razr Fold
- Main: 50MP f/1.6
- Ultrawide: 50MP
- Telephoto: 10MP
- Front: 32MP
Display comparison
Honor 200 Pro
- 6.8" OLED
- Resolution: 1224x2700
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Motorola Razr Fold
- 8.1" LTPO AMOLED
- Resolution: 2480x2200
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Battery and charging
Honor 200 Pro
- 5200 mAh
- Wired: 100W
- Wireless: 66W
Motorola Razr Fold
- 5000 mAh
- Wired: 68W
- Wireless: 50W
Overall performance score
We compared Honor 200 Pro and Motorola Razr Fold, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Motorola Razr Fold leads Honor 200 Pro by 44.5% in our overall performance rating.
Benchmarks
Launch prices and where to check today's
Launch price difference: $1099. Honor 200 Pro was $1099 cheaper at launch.
Detailed category analysis
performance
In the "performance" category, the Motorola Razr Fold notably outperforms the Honor 200 Pro (90/100 vs 75/100).
display
In the "display" category, the Honor 200 Pro and the Motorola Razr Fold are nearly equal (83/100 vs 81/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the Motorola Razr Fold notably outperforms the Honor 200 Pro (91/100 vs 70/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Honor 200 Pro is a bit better (80/100 vs 68/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, the Honor 200 Pro is a bit better (57/100 vs 52/100).
Frequently asked questions
Which is better: the Honor 200 Pro or the Motorola Razr Fold?
The Motorola Razr Fold edges out the Honor 200 Pro by just 9 points — the two devices are very close in overall level.
What is the rating of the Honor 200 Pro and the Motorola Razr Fold?
The Honor 200 Pro has a MobileRank rating of 74/100, the Motorola Razr Fold — 83/100.
Which has the better camera: the Honor 200 Pro or the Motorola Razr Fold?
The Motorola Razr Fold leads on camera score (91/100 vs 70/100).
Which is more powerful: the Honor 200 Pro or the Motorola Razr Fold?
The Motorola Razr Fold leads on performance (90/100 vs 75/100).
Should you choose the Honor 200 Pro over the Motorola Razr Fold?
The Honor 200 Pro is a better fit for active users, those who care about battery life. The Motorola Razr Fold is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts.