Honor 200 Pro vs Motorola Razr 60 Ultra
The Honor 200 Pro (2024) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3, while the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra (2025) runs on the Snapdragon 8 Elite; launch prices were $700 and $1099. By overall MobileRank rating, the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra leads — 76/100 vs 74/100 (a 2-point difference). Key differences: the Honor 200 Pro has the bigger battery (5200 mAh vs 4700); the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra is faster in AnTuTu (2,962,094 vs 1,698,060).
Profile comparison
Category scores
Honor 200 Pro
Motorola Razr 60 Ultra
What makes Honor 200 Pro better?
- Bigger battery: 5200 vs 4700 mAh
- Faster charging: 100W vs 68W
- Faster wireless charging: 66W vs 30W
- Cheaper at launch: $700 vs $1099
- Better camera (70/100 vs 57/100)
- Longer battery life (80/100 vs 58/100)
What makes Motorola Razr 60 Ultra better?
- Higher AnTuTu: 2962094 vs 1698060
- Better Geekbench Single: 3013 vs 1923
- Better Geekbench Multi: 9287 vs 5179
- Higher refresh rate: 165Hz vs 120Hz
- Higher performance (91/100 vs 75/100)
- Better display (94/100 vs 83/100)
- Better portability (68/100 vs 57/100)
Comparison verdict
Comparing the Honor 200 Pro vs the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra, the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra scores 2 points higher (76/100 vs 74/100). In the "performance" category, the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra leads (91/100 vs 75/100). In the "camera" category, the Honor 200 Pro leads (70/100 vs 57/100). In the "battery" category, the Honor 200 Pro leads (80/100 vs 58/100). Value score: Honor 200 Pro — 62/100, Motorola Razr 60 Ultra — 62/100; it shows how far a model sits above or below the usual level for its price, and is not part of the overall rating. In the "performance" category, the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra notably outperforms the Honor 200 Pro (91/100 vs 75/100). In the "display" category, the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra is a bit better (94/100 vs 83/100). In the "camera" category, the Honor 200 Pro is a bit better (70/100 vs 57/100). In the "battery" category, the Honor 200 Pro notably outperforms the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra (80/100 vs 58/100). In the "portability" category, the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra is a bit better (68/100 vs 57/100).
Specs comparison
| Specification | Honor 200 Pro | Motorola Razr 60 Ultra | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3 | Snapdragon 8 Elite | |
| AnTuTu | 1698060 | 2962094 | |
| Geekbench Single | 1923 | 3013 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 5179 | 9287 | |
| Display | 6.8" OLED | 7.0" pOLED | |
| Resolution | 1224x2700 | 1224x2912 | |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 165 Hz | |
| Battery | 5200 mAh | 4700 mAh | |
| Charging | 100W | 68W | |
| Wireless charging | 66W | 30W | |
| DXOMark (camera) | 137 | — | |
| Main camera | 50 MP | 50 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 12 MP | 50 MP | |
| Telephoto | 50 MP | 0 MP | |
| Front camera | 50 MP | 32 MP | |
| RAM | 12GB / 16GB | 12GB / 16GB | |
| Storage | 256GB / 512GB / 1TB | 256GB / 512GB / 1TB | |
| OS | Android 14, up to 4 major Android upgrades, MagicOS 8 | Android 15 | |
| Brightness (peak) | 4000 nits | 4500 nits | |
| NFC | yes | yes | |
| Protection | IP65 | IP48 | |
| Dimensions | 163.3×75.2×8.2 mm | 171.5×74.0×7.2 mm | |
| Weight | 199 g | 199 g | |
| Launch price | $700 | $1099 |
Camera comparison
Honor 200 Pro
- Main: 50MP f/1.9
- Ultrawide: 12MP
- Telephoto: 50MP
- Front: 50MP
Motorola Razr 60 Ultra
- Main: 50MP f/1.8
- Ultrawide: 50MP
- Front: 32MP
Display comparison
Honor 200 Pro
- 6.8" OLED
- Resolution: 1224x2700
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Motorola Razr 60 Ultra
- 7.0" pOLED
- Resolution: 1224x2912
- Refresh rate: 165 Hz
Battery and charging
Honor 200 Pro
- 5200 mAh
- Wired: 100W
- Wireless: 66W
Motorola Razr 60 Ultra
- 4700 mAh
- Wired: 68W
- Wireless: 30W
Overall performance score
We compared Honor 200 Pro and Motorola Razr 60 Ultra, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Motorola Razr 60 Ultra leads Honor 200 Pro by 42.7% in our overall performance rating.
Benchmarks
Launch prices and where to check today's
Launch price difference: $399. Honor 200 Pro was $399 cheaper at launch.
Detailed category analysis
performance
In the "performance" category, the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra notably outperforms the Honor 200 Pro (91/100 vs 75/100).
display
In the "display" category, the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra is a bit better (94/100 vs 83/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the Honor 200 Pro is a bit better (70/100 vs 57/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Honor 200 Pro notably outperforms the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra (80/100 vs 58/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra is a bit better (68/100 vs 57/100).
Frequently asked questions
Which is better: the Honor 200 Pro or the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra?
The Motorola Razr 60 Ultra edges out the Honor 200 Pro by just 2 points — the two devices are very close in overall level.
What is the rating of the Honor 200 Pro and the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra?
The Honor 200 Pro has a MobileRank rating of 74/100, the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra — 76/100.
Which has the better camera: the Honor 200 Pro or the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra?
The Honor 200 Pro leads on camera score (70/100 vs 57/100).
Which is more powerful: the Honor 200 Pro or the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra?
The Motorola Razr 60 Ultra leads on performance (91/100 vs 75/100).
Should you choose the Honor 200 Pro over the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra?
The Honor 200 Pro is a better fit for active users, those who care about battery life. The Motorola Razr 60 Ultra is a better fit for gamers and power users.