Motorola Razr 50 Ultra vs Vivo S50
The Motorola Razr 50 Ultra (2024) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3, while the Vivo S50 (2025) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3. By overall MobileRank rating, the Vivo S50 leads — 72/100 vs 66/100 (a 6-point difference). Key differences: the Vivo S50 has the bigger battery (6500 mAh vs 4000).
Motorola Razr 50 Ultra
Vivo S50
- Higher refresh rate: 165Hz vs 120Hz
- Lighter: 189g vs 196g
- Better display (91/100 vs 85/100)
- Better portability (75/100 vs 66/100)
- Bigger battery: 6500 vs 4000 mAh
- Faster charging: 90W vs 45W
- Better camera (64/100 vs 58/100)
- Longer battery life (68/100 vs 36/100)
Comparing the Motorola Razr 50 Ultra vs the Vivo S50, the Vivo S50 scores 6 points higher (72/100 vs 66/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo S50 leads (68/100 vs 36/100). In the "performance" category, both devices are on the same level — 75/100. In the "display" category, the Motorola Razr 50 Ultra is a bit better (91/100 vs 85/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo S50 is a bit better (64/100 vs 58/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo S50 significantly outperforms the Motorola Razr 50 Ultra (68/100 vs 36/100). In the "portability" category, the Motorola Razr 50 Ultra is a bit better (75/100 vs 66/100).
| Specification | Motorola Razr 50 Ultra | Vivo S50 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3 | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3 | |
| AnTuTu | 1801694 | 1801694 | |
| Geekbench Single | 1930 | 1930 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 4817 | 4817 | |
| Display | 6.9" Foldable LTPO AMOLED | 6.6" AMOLED | |
| Resolution | 1080x2640 | 1260x2750 | |
| Refresh rate | 165 Hz | 120 Hz | |
| Battery | 4000 mAh | 6500 mAh | |
| Charging | 45W | 90W | |
| Wireless charging | 15W | 0W | |
| Main camera | 50 MP | 50 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 0 MP | 8 MP | |
| Telephoto | 50 MP | 50 MP | |
| Front camera | 32 MP | 50 MP | |
| RAM | 8GB / 12GB | 12GB / 16GB | |
| Storage | 256GB / 512GB | 256GB / 512GB | |
| OS | Android 14, up to 3 major Android upgrades | Android 16 | |
| Brightness (peak) | 3000 nits | — | |
| NFC | yes | yes | |
| Protection | IPX8 | IP68/IP69 | |
| Dimensions | 171.4×74.0×7.1 mm | 157.5×74.3×7.6 mm | |
| Weight | 189 g | 196 g | |
| Launch price | — | $390 |
Motorola Razr 50 Ultra
- Main: 50MP f/f/1.7
- Telephoto: 50MP
- Front: 32MP
Vivo S50
- Main: 50MP f/f/1.9
- Ultrawide: 8MP
- Telephoto: 50MP
- Front: 50MP
Motorola Razr 50 Ultra
- 6.9" Foldable LTPO AMOLED
- Resolution: 1080x2640
- Refresh rate: 165 Hz
Vivo S50
- 6.6" AMOLED
- Resolution: 1260x2750
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Motorola Razr 50 Ultra
- 4000 mAh
- Wired: 45W
- Wireless: 15W
Vivo S50
- 6500 mAh
- Wired: 90W
- No wireless charging
We compared Motorola Razr 50 Ultra and Vivo S50, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Equal performance based on benchmark results.
Motorola Razr 50 Ultra
Price unknownperformance
In the "performance" category, both devices are on the same level — 75/100.
display
In the "display" category, the Motorola Razr 50 Ultra is a bit better (91/100 vs 85/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the Vivo S50 is a bit better (64/100 vs 58/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Vivo S50 significantly outperforms the Motorola Razr 50 Ultra (68/100 vs 36/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, the Motorola Razr 50 Ultra is a bit better (75/100 vs 66/100).
Which is better: the Motorola Razr 50 Ultra or the Vivo S50?
The Vivo S50 edges out the Motorola Razr 50 Ultra by just 6 points — the two devices are very close in overall level.
What is the rating of the Motorola Razr 50 Ultra and the Vivo S50?
The Motorola Razr 50 Ultra has a MobileRank rating of 66/100, the Vivo S50 — 72/100.
Which has the better camera: the Motorola Razr 50 Ultra or the Vivo S50?
The Vivo S50 leads on camera score (64/100 vs 58/100).
Should you choose the Motorola Razr 50 Ultra over the Vivo S50?
The Motorola Razr 50 Ultra is a better fit for active users. The Vivo S50 is a better fit for active users, budget-conscious buyers.