Motorola Razr 50 Ultra vs Motorola Razr Fold
The Motorola Razr 50 Ultra (2024) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3, while the Motorola Razr Fold (2026) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 5. By overall MobileRank rating, the Motorola Razr Fold leads — 83/100 vs 66/100 (a 17-point difference). Key differences: the Motorola Razr Fold has the bigger battery (5000 mAh vs 4000); the Motorola Razr Fold is faster in AnTuTu (3,057,215 vs 1,797,821); the Motorola Razr 50 Ultra is noticeably lighter (189g vs 285g).
Profile comparison
Category scores
Motorola Razr 50 Ultra
Motorola Razr Fold
What makes Motorola Razr 50 Ultra better?
- Higher refresh rate: 165Hz vs 120Hz
- Lighter: 189g vs 285g
- Better display (91/100 vs 81/100)
- Better portability (75/100 vs 52/100)
What makes Motorola Razr Fold better?
- Higher AnTuTu: 3057215 vs 1797821
- Better Geekbench Single: 2833 vs 1923
- Better Geekbench Multi: 9119 vs 5179
- Bigger battery: 5000 vs 4000 mAh
- Faster charging: 68W vs 45W
- Faster wireless charging: 50W vs 15W
- Higher performance (90/100 vs 75/100)
- Better camera (91/100 vs 58/100)
- Longer battery life (68/100 vs 36/100)
Comparison verdict
Comparing the Motorola Razr 50 Ultra vs the Motorola Razr Fold, the Motorola Razr Fold scores 17 points higher (83/100 vs 66/100). In the "performance" category, the Motorola Razr Fold leads (90/100 vs 75/100). In the "camera" category, the Motorola Razr Fold leads (91/100 vs 58/100). In the "battery" category, the Motorola Razr Fold leads (68/100 vs 36/100). In the "performance" category, the Motorola Razr Fold notably outperforms the Motorola Razr 50 Ultra (90/100 vs 75/100). In the "display" category, the Motorola Razr 50 Ultra is a bit better (91/100 vs 81/100). In the "camera" category, the Motorola Razr Fold significantly outperforms the Motorola Razr 50 Ultra (91/100 vs 58/100). In the "battery" category, the Motorola Razr Fold significantly outperforms the Motorola Razr 50 Ultra (68/100 vs 36/100). In the "portability" category, the Motorola Razr 50 Ultra notably outperforms the Motorola Razr Fold (75/100 vs 52/100).
Specs comparison
| Specification | Motorola Razr 50 Ultra | Motorola Razr Fold | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3 | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 5 | |
| AnTuTu | 1797821 | 3057215 | |
| Geekbench Single | 1923 | 2833 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 5179 | 9119 | |
| Display | 6.9" Foldable LTPO AMOLED | 8.1" LTPO AMOLED | |
| Resolution | 1080x2640 | 2480x2200 | |
| Refresh rate | 165 Hz | 120 Hz | |
| Battery | 4000 mAh | 5000 mAh | |
| Charging | 45W | 68W | |
| Wireless charging | 15W | 50W | |
| DXOMark (camera) | — | 164 | |
| Main camera | 50 MP | 50 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 0 MP | 50 MP | |
| Telephoto | 50 MP | 10 MP | |
| Front camera | 32 MP | 32 MP | |
| RAM | 8GB / 12GB | 12GB | |
| Storage | 256GB / 512GB | 256GB / 512GB | |
| OS | Android 14, up to 3 major Android upgrades | Android 16 | |
| Brightness (peak) | 3000 nits | 6200 nits | |
| NFC | yes | yes | |
| Protection | IPX8 | IPX9 | |
| Dimensions | 171.4×74.0×7.1 mm | 160.1×144.5×4.7 mm | |
| Weight | 189 g | 285 g | |
| Launch price | — | $1799 |
Camera comparison
Motorola Razr 50 Ultra
- Main: 50MP f/1.7
- Telephoto: 50MP
- Front: 32MP
Motorola Razr Fold
- Main: 50MP f/1.6
- Ultrawide: 50MP
- Telephoto: 10MP
- Front: 32MP
Display comparison
Motorola Razr 50 Ultra
- 6.9" Foldable LTPO AMOLED
- Resolution: 1080x2640
- Refresh rate: 165 Hz
Motorola Razr Fold
- 8.1" LTPO AMOLED
- Resolution: 2480x2200
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Battery and charging
Motorola Razr 50 Ultra
- 4000 mAh
- Wired: 45W
- Wireless: 15W
Motorola Razr Fold
- 5000 mAh
- Wired: 68W
- Wireless: 50W
Overall performance score
We compared Motorola Razr 50 Ultra and Motorola Razr Fold, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Motorola Razr Fold leads Motorola Razr 50 Ultra by 41.2% in our overall performance rating.
Benchmarks
Launch prices and where to check today's
Motorola Razr 50 Ultra
Price unknownDetailed category analysis
performance
In the "performance" category, the Motorola Razr Fold notably outperforms the Motorola Razr 50 Ultra (90/100 vs 75/100).
display
In the "display" category, the Motorola Razr 50 Ultra is a bit better (91/100 vs 81/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the Motorola Razr Fold significantly outperforms the Motorola Razr 50 Ultra (91/100 vs 58/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Motorola Razr Fold significantly outperforms the Motorola Razr 50 Ultra (68/100 vs 36/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, the Motorola Razr 50 Ultra notably outperforms the Motorola Razr Fold (75/100 vs 52/100).
Frequently asked questions
Which is better: the Motorola Razr 50 Ultra or the Motorola Razr Fold?
The Motorola Razr Fold is noticeably better than the Motorola Razr 50 Ultra — the overall rating gap is 17 points.
What is the rating of the Motorola Razr 50 Ultra and the Motorola Razr Fold?
The Motorola Razr 50 Ultra has a MobileRank rating of 66/100, the Motorola Razr Fold — 83/100.
Which has the better camera: the Motorola Razr 50 Ultra or the Motorola Razr Fold?
The Motorola Razr Fold leads on camera score (91/100 vs 58/100).
Which is more powerful: the Motorola Razr 50 Ultra or the Motorola Razr Fold?
The Motorola Razr Fold leads on performance (90/100 vs 75/100).
Should you choose the Motorola Razr 50 Ultra over the Motorola Razr Fold?
The Motorola Razr 50 Ultra is a better fit for active users. The Motorola Razr Fold is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts.