Motorola Razr 60 Ultra vs Motorola Razr Fold
The Motorola Razr 60 Ultra (2025) runs on the Snapdragon 8 Elite, while the Motorola Razr Fold (2026) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5; estimated prices are $1099 and $1799. By overall MobileRank rating, the Motorola Razr Fold leads — 86/100 vs 76/100 (a 10-point difference). Key differences: the Motorola Razr Fold has the bigger battery (5000 mAh vs 4700); the Motorola Razr Fold is faster in AnTuTu (3,942,923 vs 3,113,462); the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra is noticeably lighter (199g vs 285g).
Motorola Razr 60 Ultra
Motorola Razr Fold
- Higher refresh rate: 165Hz vs 120Hz
- Lighter: 199g vs 285g
- Cheaper: $1099 vs $1799
- Better display (94/100 vs 81/100)
- Better portability (68/100 vs 52/100)
- Higher AnTuTu: 3942923 vs 3113462
- Better Geekbench Single: 3640 vs 3041
- Better Geekbench Multi: 11033 vs 9494
- Bigger battery: 5000 vs 4700 mAh
- Faster wireless charging: 50W vs 30W
- Higher performance (98/100 vs 92/100)
- Better camera (91/100 vs 57/100)
- Longer battery life (68/100 vs 58/100)
- Better value for money (76/100 vs 64/100)
Comparing the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra vs the Motorola Razr Fold, the Motorola Razr Fold scores 10 points higher (86/100 vs 76/100). In the "camera" category, the Motorola Razr Fold leads (91/100 vs 57/100). In the "battery" category, the Motorola Razr Fold leads (68/100 vs 58/100). In the "value for money" category, the Motorola Razr Fold leads (76/100 vs 64/100). In the "performance" category, the Motorola Razr Fold is a bit better (98/100 vs 92/100). In the "display" category, the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra is a bit better (94/100 vs 81/100). In the "camera" category, the Motorola Razr Fold significantly outperforms the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra (91/100 vs 57/100). In the "battery" category, the Motorola Razr Fold is a bit better (68/100 vs 58/100). In the "portability" category, the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra notably outperforms the Motorola Razr Fold (68/100 vs 52/100). In the "value for money" category, the Motorola Razr Fold is a bit better (76/100 vs 64/100).
| Specification | Motorola Razr 60 Ultra | Motorola Razr Fold | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | Snapdragon 8 Elite | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 | |
| AnTuTu | 3113462 | 3942923 | |
| Geekbench Single | 3041 | 3640 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 9494 | 11033 | |
| Display | 7.0" pOLED | 8.1" LTPO AMOLED | |
| Resolution | 1224x2912 | 2480x2200 | |
| Refresh rate | 165 Hz | 120 Hz | |
| Battery | 4700 mAh | 5000 mAh | |
| Charging | 68W | 68W | |
| Wireless charging | 30W | 50W | |
| DXOMark (camera) | — | 164 | |
| Main camera | 50 MP | 50 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 50 MP | 50 MP | |
| Telephoto | 0 MP | 10 MP | |
| Front camera | 32 MP | 32 MP | |
| RAM | 12GB / 16GB | 12GB | |
| Storage | 256GB / 512GB / 1TB | 256GB / 512GB | |
| OS | Android 15 | Android 16 | |
| Brightness (peak) | 4500 nits | 6200 nits | |
| NFC | yes | yes | |
| Protection | IP48 | IPX9 | |
| Dimensions | 171.5×74.0×7.2 mm | 160.1×144.5×4.7 mm | |
| Weight | 199 g | 285 g | |
| Price | $1099 | $1799 |
Motorola Razr 60 Ultra
- Main: 50MP f/f/1.8
- Ultrawide: 50MP
- Front: 32MP
Motorola Razr Fold
- Main: 50MP f/1.6
- Ultrawide: 50MP
- Telephoto: 10MP
- Front: 32MP
Motorola Razr 60 Ultra
- 7.0" pOLED
- Resolution: 1224x2912
- Refresh rate: 165 Hz
Motorola Razr Fold
- 8.1" LTPO AMOLED
- Resolution: 2480x2200
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Motorola Razr 60 Ultra
- 4700 mAh
- Wired: 68W
- Wireless: 30W
Motorola Razr Fold
- 5000 mAh
- Wired: 68W
- Wireless: 50W
We compared Motorola Razr 60 Ultra and Motorola Razr Fold, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Motorola Razr Fold leads Motorola Razr 60 Ultra by 21.0% in our overall performance rating.
Price difference: $700. Motorola Razr 60 Ultra is cheaper by $700.
performance
In the "performance" category, the Motorola Razr Fold is a bit better (98/100 vs 92/100).
display
In the "display" category, the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra is a bit better (94/100 vs 81/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the Motorola Razr Fold significantly outperforms the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra (91/100 vs 57/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Motorola Razr Fold is a bit better (68/100 vs 58/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra notably outperforms the Motorola Razr Fold (68/100 vs 52/100).
value for money
In the "value for money" category, the Motorola Razr Fold is a bit better (76/100 vs 64/100).
Which is better: the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra or the Motorola Razr Fold?
The Motorola Razr Fold is noticeably better than the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra — the overall rating gap is 10 points.
What is the rating of the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra and the Motorola Razr Fold?
The Motorola Razr 60 Ultra has a MobileRank rating of 76/100, the Motorola Razr Fold — 86/100.
Which has the better camera: the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra or the Motorola Razr Fold?
The Motorola Razr Fold leads on camera score (91/100 vs 57/100).
Which is more powerful: the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra or the Motorola Razr Fold?
The Motorola Razr Fold leads on performance (98/100 vs 92/100).
Should you choose the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra over the Motorola Razr Fold?
The Motorola Razr 60 Ultra is a better fit for gamers and power users. The Motorola Razr Fold is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts, budget-conscious buyers.