Motorola Razr 60 Ultra vs Motorola Signature
The Motorola Razr 60 Ultra (2025) runs on the Snapdragon 8 Elite, while the Motorola Signature (2026) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 5; launch prices were $1099 and $699. By overall MobileRank rating, the Motorola Signature leads — 86/100 vs 76/100 (a 10-point difference). Key differences: the Motorola Signature has the bigger battery (5200 mAh vs 4700); the Motorola Signature is faster in AnTuTu (3,057,215 vs 2,962,094).
Profile comparison
Category scores
Motorola Razr 60 Ultra
Motorola Signature
What makes Motorola Razr 60 Ultra better?
- Better Geekbench Single: 3013 vs 2833
- Better Geekbench Multi: 9287 vs 9119
- Higher refresh rate: 165Hz vs 120Hz
- Higher performance (91/100 vs 90/100)
- Better display (94/100 vs 84/100)
What makes Motorola Signature better?
- Higher AnTuTu: 3057215 vs 2962094
- Bigger battery: 5200 vs 4700 mAh
- Faster charging: 90W vs 68W
- Faster wireless charging: 50W vs 30W
- Lighter: 186g vs 199g
- Cheaper at launch: $699 vs $1099
- Better camera (91/100 vs 57/100)
- Longer battery life (77/100 vs 58/100)
- Better portability (78/100 vs 68/100)
Comparison verdict
Comparing the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra vs the Motorola Signature, the Motorola Signature scores 10 points higher (86/100 vs 76/100). In the "camera" category, the Motorola Signature leads (91/100 vs 57/100). In the "battery" category, the Motorola Signature leads (77/100 vs 58/100). Value score: Motorola Razr 60 Ultra — 62/100, Motorola Signature — 86/100; it shows how far a model sits above or below the usual level for its price, and is not part of the overall rating. In the "performance" category, the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra and the Motorola Signature are nearly equal (91/100 vs 90/100). In the "display" category, the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra is a bit better (94/100 vs 84/100). In the "camera" category, the Motorola Signature significantly outperforms the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra (91/100 vs 57/100). In the "battery" category, the Motorola Signature notably outperforms the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra (77/100 vs 58/100). In the "portability" category, the Motorola Signature is a bit better (78/100 vs 68/100).
Specs comparison
| Specification | Motorola Razr 60 Ultra | Motorola Signature | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | Snapdragon 8 Elite | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 5 | |
| AnTuTu | 2962094 | 3057215 | |
| Geekbench Single | 3013 | 2833 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 9287 | 9119 | |
| Display | 7.0" pOLED | 6.8" AMOLED | |
| Resolution | 1224x2912 | 1264x2780 | |
| Refresh rate | 165 Hz | 120 Hz | |
| Battery | 4700 mAh | 5200 mAh | |
| Charging | 68W | 90W | |
| Wireless charging | 30W | 50W | |
| DXOMark (camera) | — | 164 | |
| Main camera | 50 MP | 50 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 50 MP | 13 MP | |
| Telephoto | 0 MP | 50 MP | |
| Front camera | 32 MP | 32 MP | |
| RAM | 12GB / 16GB | 12GB / 16GB | |
| Storage | 256GB / 512GB / 1TB | 256GB / 512GB / 1TB | |
| OS | Android 15 | Android 16 | |
| Brightness (peak) | 4500 nits | 6200 nits | |
| NFC | yes | yes | |
| Protection | IP48 | IP68 | |
| Dimensions | 171.5×74.0×7.2 mm | 162.1×76.4×7.0 mm | |
| Weight | 199 g | 186 g | |
| Launch price | $1099 | $699 |
Camera comparison
Motorola Razr 60 Ultra
- Main: 50MP f/1.8
- Ultrawide: 50MP
- Front: 32MP
Motorola Signature
- Main: 50MP f/1.8
- Ultrawide: 13MP
- Telephoto: 50MP
- Front: 32MP
Display comparison
Motorola Razr 60 Ultra
- 7.0" pOLED
- Resolution: 1224x2912
- Refresh rate: 165 Hz
Motorola Signature
- 6.8" AMOLED
- Resolution: 1264x2780
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Battery and charging
Motorola Razr 60 Ultra
- 4700 mAh
- Wired: 68W
- Wireless: 30W
Motorola Signature
- 5200 mAh
- Wired: 90W
- Wireless: 50W
Overall performance score
We compared Motorola Razr 60 Ultra and Motorola Signature, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Motorola Signature leads Motorola Razr 60 Ultra by 3.1% in our overall performance rating.
Benchmarks
Launch prices and where to check today's
Launch price difference: $400. Motorola Signature was $400 cheaper at launch.
Detailed category analysis
performance
In the "performance" category, the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra and the Motorola Signature are nearly equal (91/100 vs 90/100).
display
In the "display" category, the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra is a bit better (94/100 vs 84/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the Motorola Signature significantly outperforms the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra (91/100 vs 57/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Motorola Signature notably outperforms the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra (77/100 vs 58/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, the Motorola Signature is a bit better (78/100 vs 68/100).
Frequently asked questions
Which is better: the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra or the Motorola Signature?
The Motorola Signature is noticeably better than the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra — the overall rating gap is 10 points.
What is the rating of the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra and the Motorola Signature?
The Motorola Razr 60 Ultra has a MobileRank rating of 76/100, the Motorola Signature — 86/100.
Which has the better camera: the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra or the Motorola Signature?
The Motorola Signature leads on camera score (91/100 vs 57/100).
Should you choose the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra over the Motorola Signature?
The Motorola Razr 60 Ultra is a better fit for gamers and power users. The Motorola Signature is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.