Motorola Razr 60 Ultra vs Motorola Signature
The Motorola Razr 60 Ultra (2025) runs on the Snapdragon 8 Elite, while the Motorola Signature (2026) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5; estimated prices are $1099 and $699. By overall MobileRank rating, the Motorola Signature leads — 89/100 vs 76/100 (a 13-point difference). Key differences: the Motorola Signature has the bigger battery (5200 mAh vs 4700); the Motorola Signature is faster in AnTuTu (3,942,923 vs 3,113,462).
Motorola Razr 60 Ultra
Motorola Signature
- Higher refresh rate: 165Hz vs 120Hz
- Better display (94/100 vs 84/100)
- Higher AnTuTu: 3942923 vs 3113462
- Better Geekbench Single: 3640 vs 3041
- Better Geekbench Multi: 11033 vs 9494
- Bigger battery: 5200 vs 4700 mAh
- Faster charging: 90W vs 68W
- Faster wireless charging: 50W vs 30W
- Lighter: 186g vs 199g
- Cheaper: $699 vs $1099
- Higher performance (98/100 vs 92/100)
- Better camera (91/100 vs 57/100)
- Longer battery life (77/100 vs 58/100)
- Better portability (78/100 vs 68/100)
- Better value for money (90/100 vs 64/100)
Comparing the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra vs the Motorola Signature, the Motorola Signature scores 13 points higher (89/100 vs 76/100). In the "camera" category, the Motorola Signature leads (91/100 vs 57/100). In the "battery" category, the Motorola Signature leads (77/100 vs 58/100). In the "value for money" category, the Motorola Signature leads (90/100 vs 64/100). In the "performance" category, the Motorola Signature is a bit better (98/100 vs 92/100). In the "display" category, the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra is a bit better (94/100 vs 84/100). In the "camera" category, the Motorola Signature significantly outperforms the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra (91/100 vs 57/100). In the "battery" category, the Motorola Signature notably outperforms the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra (77/100 vs 58/100). In the "portability" category, the Motorola Signature is a bit better (78/100 vs 68/100). In the "value for money" category, the Motorola Signature notably outperforms the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra (90/100 vs 64/100).
| Specification | Motorola Razr 60 Ultra | Motorola Signature | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | Snapdragon 8 Elite | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 | |
| AnTuTu | 3113462 | 3942923 | |
| Geekbench Single | 3041 | 3640 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 9494 | 11033 | |
| Display | 7.0" pOLED | 6.8" AMOLED | |
| Resolution | 1224x2912 | 1264x2780 | |
| Refresh rate | 165 Hz | 120 Hz | |
| Battery | 4700 mAh | 5200 mAh | |
| Charging | 68W | 90W | |
| Wireless charging | 30W | 50W | |
| DXOMark (camera) | — | 164 | |
| Main camera | 50 MP | 50 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 50 MP | 13 MP | |
| Front camera | 32 MP | 32 MP | |
| RAM | 12GB / 16GB | 12GB / 16GB | |
| Storage | 256GB / 512GB / 1TB | 256GB / 512GB / 1TB | |
| OS | Android 15 | Android 16 | |
| Brightness (peak) | 4500 nits | 6200 nits | |
| NFC | yes | yes | |
| Protection | IP48 | IP68 | |
| Dimensions | 171.5×74.0×7.2 mm | 162.1×76.4×7.0 mm | |
| Weight | 199 g | 186 g | |
| Price | $1099 | $699 |
Motorola Razr 60 Ultra
- Main: 50MP f/f/1.8
- Ultrawide: 50MP
- Front: 32MP
Motorola Signature
- Main: 50MP f/f/1.8
- Ultrawide: 13MP
- Front: 32MP
Motorola Razr 60 Ultra
- 7.0" pOLED
- Resolution: 1224x2912
- Refresh rate: 165 Hz
Motorola Signature
- 6.8" AMOLED
- Resolution: 1264x2780
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Motorola Razr 60 Ultra
- 4700 mAh
- Wired: 68W
- Wireless: 30W
Motorola Signature
- 5200 mAh
- Wired: 90W
- Wireless: 50W
We compared Motorola Razr 60 Ultra and Motorola Signature, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Motorola Signature leads Motorola Razr 60 Ultra by 21.0% in our overall performance rating.
Price difference: $400. Motorola Signature is cheaper by $400.
performance
In the "performance" category, the Motorola Signature is a bit better (98/100 vs 92/100).
display
In the "display" category, the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra is a bit better (94/100 vs 84/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the Motorola Signature significantly outperforms the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra (91/100 vs 57/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Motorola Signature notably outperforms the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra (77/100 vs 58/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, the Motorola Signature is a bit better (78/100 vs 68/100).
value for money
In the "value for money" category, the Motorola Signature notably outperforms the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra (90/100 vs 64/100).
Which is better: the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra or the Motorola Signature?
The Motorola Signature is noticeably better than the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra — the overall rating gap is 13 points.
What is the rating of the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra and the Motorola Signature?
The Motorola Razr 60 Ultra has a MobileRank rating of 76/100, the Motorola Signature — 89/100.
Which has the better camera: the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra or the Motorola Signature?
The Motorola Signature leads on camera score (91/100 vs 57/100).
Which is more powerful: the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra or the Motorola Signature?
The Motorola Signature leads on performance (98/100 vs 92/100).
Should you choose the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra over the Motorola Signature?
The Motorola Razr 60 Ultra is a better fit for gamers and power users. The Motorola Signature is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.