Motorola Razr 50 Ultra vs Motorola Signature
The Motorola Razr 50 Ultra (2024) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3, while the Motorola Signature (2026) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 5. By overall MobileRank rating, the Motorola Signature leads — 86/100 vs 66/100 (a 20-point difference). Key differences: the Motorola Signature has the bigger battery (5200 mAh vs 4000); the Motorola Signature is faster in AnTuTu (3,057,215 vs 1,797,821).
Profile comparison
Category scores
Motorola Razr 50 Ultra
Motorola Signature
What makes Motorola Razr 50 Ultra better?
- Higher refresh rate: 165Hz vs 120Hz
- Better display (91/100 vs 84/100)
What makes Motorola Signature better?
- Higher AnTuTu: 3057215 vs 1797821
- Better Geekbench Single: 2833 vs 1923
- Better Geekbench Multi: 9119 vs 5179
- Bigger battery: 5200 vs 4000 mAh
- Faster charging: 90W vs 45W
- Faster wireless charging: 50W vs 15W
- Lighter: 186g vs 189g
- Higher performance (90/100 vs 75/100)
- Better camera (91/100 vs 58/100)
- Longer battery life (77/100 vs 36/100)
- Better portability (78/100 vs 75/100)
Comparison verdict
Comparing the Motorola Razr 50 Ultra vs the Motorola Signature, the Motorola Signature scores 20 points higher (86/100 vs 66/100). In the "performance" category, the Motorola Signature leads (90/100 vs 75/100). In the "camera" category, the Motorola Signature leads (91/100 vs 58/100). In the "battery" category, the Motorola Signature leads (77/100 vs 36/100). In the "performance" category, the Motorola Signature notably outperforms the Motorola Razr 50 Ultra (90/100 vs 75/100). In the "display" category, the Motorola Razr 50 Ultra is a bit better (91/100 vs 84/100). In the "camera" category, the Motorola Signature significantly outperforms the Motorola Razr 50 Ultra (91/100 vs 58/100). In the "battery" category, the Motorola Signature significantly outperforms the Motorola Razr 50 Ultra (77/100 vs 36/100). In the "portability" category, the Motorola Signature and the Motorola Razr 50 Ultra are nearly equal (78/100 vs 75/100).
Specs comparison
| Specification | Motorola Razr 50 Ultra | Motorola Signature | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3 | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 5 | |
| AnTuTu | 1797821 | 3057215 | |
| Geekbench Single | 1923 | 2833 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 5179 | 9119 | |
| Display | 6.9" Foldable LTPO AMOLED | 6.8" AMOLED | |
| Resolution | 1080x2640 | 1264x2780 | |
| Refresh rate | 165 Hz | 120 Hz | |
| Battery | 4000 mAh | 5200 mAh | |
| Charging | 45W | 90W | |
| Wireless charging | 15W | 50W | |
| DXOMark (camera) | — | 164 | |
| Main camera | 50 MP | 50 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 0 MP | 13 MP | |
| Telephoto | 50 MP | 50 MP | |
| Front camera | 32 MP | 32 MP | |
| RAM | 8GB / 12GB | 12GB / 16GB | |
| Storage | 256GB / 512GB | 256GB / 512GB / 1TB | |
| OS | Android 14, up to 3 major Android upgrades | Android 16 | |
| Brightness (peak) | 3000 nits | 6200 nits | |
| NFC | yes | yes | |
| Protection | IPX8 | IP68 | |
| Dimensions | 171.4×74.0×7.1 mm | 162.1×76.4×7.0 mm | |
| Weight | 189 g | 186 g | |
| Launch price | — | $699 |
Camera comparison
Motorola Razr 50 Ultra
- Main: 50MP f/1.7
- Telephoto: 50MP
- Front: 32MP
Motorola Signature
- Main: 50MP f/1.8
- Ultrawide: 13MP
- Telephoto: 50MP
- Front: 32MP
Display comparison
Motorola Razr 50 Ultra
- 6.9" Foldable LTPO AMOLED
- Resolution: 1080x2640
- Refresh rate: 165 Hz
Motorola Signature
- 6.8" AMOLED
- Resolution: 1264x2780
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Battery and charging
Motorola Razr 50 Ultra
- 4000 mAh
- Wired: 45W
- Wireless: 15W
Motorola Signature
- 5200 mAh
- Wired: 90W
- Wireless: 50W
Overall performance score
We compared Motorola Razr 50 Ultra and Motorola Signature, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Motorola Signature leads Motorola Razr 50 Ultra by 41.2% in our overall performance rating.
Benchmarks
Launch prices and where to check today's
Motorola Razr 50 Ultra
Price unknownDetailed category analysis
performance
In the "performance" category, the Motorola Signature notably outperforms the Motorola Razr 50 Ultra (90/100 vs 75/100).
display
In the "display" category, the Motorola Razr 50 Ultra is a bit better (91/100 vs 84/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the Motorola Signature significantly outperforms the Motorola Razr 50 Ultra (91/100 vs 58/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Motorola Signature significantly outperforms the Motorola Razr 50 Ultra (77/100 vs 36/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, the Motorola Signature and the Motorola Razr 50 Ultra are nearly equal (78/100 vs 75/100).
Frequently asked questions
Which is better: the Motorola Razr 50 Ultra or the Motorola Signature?
The Motorola Signature significantly outperforms the Motorola Razr 50 Ultra by 20 points (86/100 vs 66/100).
What is the rating of the Motorola Razr 50 Ultra and the Motorola Signature?
The Motorola Razr 50 Ultra has a MobileRank rating of 66/100, the Motorola Signature — 86/100.
Which has the better camera: the Motorola Razr 50 Ultra or the Motorola Signature?
The Motorola Signature leads on camera score (91/100 vs 58/100).
Which is more powerful: the Motorola Razr 50 Ultra or the Motorola Signature?
The Motorola Signature leads on performance (90/100 vs 75/100).
Should you choose the Motorola Razr 50 Ultra over the Motorola Signature?
The Motorola Razr 50 Ultra is a better fit for active users. The Motorola Signature is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.