Lava Blaze Curve vs Samsung Galaxy A17

The Lava Blaze Curve (2024) runs on the Dimensity 7050, while the Samsung Galaxy A17 (2025) runs on the MediaTek Helio G99. By overall MobileRank rating, the Lava Blaze Curve leads — 54/100 vs 45/100 (a 9-point difference). Key differences: the main camera is 64 MP vs 50 MP; the Lava Blaze Curve is faster in AnTuTu (806,012 vs 554,590); the Samsung Galaxy A17 has NFC for contactless payments, the Lava Blaze Curve doesn't; the Samsung Galaxy A17 is thinner (7.5mm vs 8.8mm).

The Lava Blaze Curve edges out the Samsung Galaxy A17 by just 9 points — the two devices are very close in overall level.

Profile comparison

Category scores

Lava Blaze Curve

Performance 53
Display 79
Camera 48
Battery 46
Portability 57
Value for money —

Samsung Galaxy A17

Performance 43
Display 67
Camera 33
Battery 44
Portability 70
Value for money 66

What makes Lava Blaze Curve better?

  • Higher AnTuTu: 806012 vs 554590
  • Better Geekbench Single: 1061 vs 727
  • Better Geekbench Multi: 2398 vs 2047
  • Faster charging: 33W vs 25W
  • Better main camera: 64MP vs 50MP
  • Higher refresh rate: 120Hz vs 90Hz
  • Lighter: 189g vs 190g

  • Higher performance (53/100 vs 43/100)
  • Better camera (48/100 vs 33/100)
  • Longer battery life (46/100 vs 44/100)
  • Better display (79/100 vs 67/100)

What makes Samsung Galaxy A17 better?


  • Better portability (70/100 vs 57/100)

Comparison verdict

Comparing the Lava Blaze Curve vs the Samsung Galaxy A17, the Lava Blaze Curve scores 9 points higher (54/100 vs 45/100). In the "performance" category, the Lava Blaze Curve leads (53/100 vs 43/100). In the "camera" category, the Lava Blaze Curve leads (48/100 vs 33/100). In the "performance" category, the Lava Blaze Curve is a bit better (53/100 vs 43/100). In the "display" category, the Lava Blaze Curve is a bit better (79/100 vs 67/100). In the "camera" category, the Lava Blaze Curve notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy A17 (48/100 vs 33/100). In the "battery" category, the Lava Blaze Curve and the Samsung Galaxy A17 are nearly equal (46/100 vs 44/100). In the "portability" category, the Samsung Galaxy A17 is a bit better (70/100 vs 57/100).

Specs comparison

Specification Lava Blaze Curve Samsung Galaxy A17
Processor Dimensity 7050 MediaTek Helio G99
AnTuTu 806012 554590
Geekbench Single 1061 727
Geekbench Multi 2398 2047
Display 6.7" AMOLED 6.7" Super AMOLED
Resolution 1080x2400 1080x2340
Refresh rate 120 Hz 90 Hz
Battery 5000 mAh 5000 mAh
Charging 33W 25W
Main camera 64 MP 50 MP
Ultrawide 8 MP 5 MP
Front camera 32 MP 13 MP
RAM 8GB 4GB / 6GB / 8GB
Storage 128GB / 256GB 128GB / 256GB
OS Android 13 Android 15 / One UI 7
Brightness (peak) 800 nits 800 nits
NFC no yes
Protection — IP54
Dimensions 161.8×74.0×8.8 mm 164.4×77.9×7.5 mm
Weight 189 g 190 g
Launch price — $147

Camera comparison

Lava Blaze Curve

  • Main: 64MP
  • Ultrawide: 8MP
  • Front: 32MP
48
camera

Samsung Galaxy A17

  • Main: 50MP f/1.8
  • Ultrawide: 5MP
  • Front: 13MP
33
camera

Display comparison

Lava Blaze Curve

  • 6.7" AMOLED
  • Resolution: 1080x2400
  • Refresh rate: 120 Hz
79
display

Samsung Galaxy A17

  • 6.7" Super AMOLED
  • Resolution: 1080x2340
  • Refresh rate: 90 Hz
67
display

Battery and charging

Lava Blaze Curve

  • 5000 mAh
  • Wired: 33W
  • No wireless charging
46
battery

Samsung Galaxy A17

  • 5000 mAh
  • Wired: 25W
  • No wireless charging
44
battery

Overall performance score

We compared Lava Blaze Curve and Samsung Galaxy A17, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.

Lava Blaze Curve Dimensity 7050
54/100
806012 AnTuTu
Samsung Galaxy A17 MediaTek Helio G99
45/100 -45.3%
554590 AnTuTu

Lava Blaze Curve leads Samsung Galaxy A17 by 45.3% in our overall performance rating.

Benchmarks

Launch prices and where to check today's

Lava Blaze Curve

Price unknown

Samsung Galaxy A17

$147

Detailed category analysis

performance

In the "performance" category, the Lava Blaze Curve is a bit better (53/100 vs 43/100).

display

In the "display" category, the Lava Blaze Curve is a bit better (79/100 vs 67/100).

camera

In the "camera" category, the Lava Blaze Curve notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy A17 (48/100 vs 33/100).

battery

In the "battery" category, the Lava Blaze Curve and the Samsung Galaxy A17 are nearly equal (46/100 vs 44/100).

portability

In the "portability" category, the Samsung Galaxy A17 is a bit better (70/100 vs 57/100).

Frequently asked questions

Which is better: the Lava Blaze Curve or the Samsung Galaxy A17?

The Lava Blaze Curve edges out the Samsung Galaxy A17 by just 9 points — the two devices are very close in overall level.

What is the rating of the Lava Blaze Curve and the Samsung Galaxy A17?

The Lava Blaze Curve has a MobileRank rating of 54/100, the Samsung Galaxy A17 — 45/100.

Which has the better camera: the Lava Blaze Curve or the Samsung Galaxy A17?

The Lava Blaze Curve leads on camera score (48/100 vs 33/100).

Which is more powerful: the Lava Blaze Curve or the Samsung Galaxy A17?

The Lava Blaze Curve leads on performance (53/100 vs 43/100).

Should you choose the Lava Blaze Curve over the Samsung Galaxy A17?

Neither model stands out enough to recommend it for a specific use case: the clearest difference is camera — better on the Lava Blaze Curve (48/100 vs 33/100).