Lava Blaze Amoled 2 vs Samsung Galaxy A17
The Lava Blaze Amoled 2 (2025) runs on the MediaTek Dimensity 7060, while the Samsung Galaxy A17 (2025) runs on the MediaTek Helio G99; launch prices were $139 and $147. By overall MobileRank rating, the Lava Blaze Amoled 2 leads — 50/100 vs 45/100 (a 5-point difference). Key differences: the Lava Blaze Amoled 2 is faster in AnTuTu (693,978 vs 554,590); the Samsung Galaxy A17 has NFC for contactless payments, the Lava Blaze Amoled 2 doesn't; the Lava Blaze Amoled 2 is noticeably lighter (174g vs 190g).
Profile comparison
Category scores
Lava Blaze Amoled 2
Samsung Galaxy A17
What makes Lava Blaze Amoled 2 better?
- Higher AnTuTu: 693978 vs 554590
- Better Geekbench Single: 1037 vs 727
- Better Geekbench Multi: 2386 vs 2047
- Faster charging: 33W vs 25W
- Higher refresh rate: 120Hz vs 90Hz
- Lighter: 174g vs 190g
- Cheaper at launch: $139 vs $147
- Higher performance (51/100 vs 43/100)
- Longer battery life (46/100 vs 44/100)
- Better display (79/100 vs 67/100)
- Better portability (79/100 vs 70/100)
What makes Samsung Galaxy A17 better?
- Better camera (33/100 vs 30/100)
Comparison verdict
Comparing the Lava Blaze Amoled 2 vs the Samsung Galaxy A17, the Lava Blaze Amoled 2 scores 5 points higher (50/100 vs 45/100). Value score: Lava Blaze Amoled 2 — 78/100, Samsung Galaxy A17 — 66/100; it shows how far a model sits above or below the usual level for its price, and is not part of the overall rating. In the "performance" category, the Lava Blaze Amoled 2 is a bit better (51/100 vs 43/100). In the "display" category, the Lava Blaze Amoled 2 is a bit better (79/100 vs 67/100). In the "camera" category, the Samsung Galaxy A17 and the Lava Blaze Amoled 2 are nearly equal (33/100 vs 30/100). In the "battery" category, the Lava Blaze Amoled 2 and the Samsung Galaxy A17 are nearly equal (46/100 vs 44/100). In the "portability" category, the Lava Blaze Amoled 2 is a bit better (79/100 vs 70/100).
Specs comparison
| Specification | Lava Blaze Amoled 2 | Samsung Galaxy A17 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | MediaTek Dimensity 7060 | MediaTek Helio G99 | |
| AnTuTu | 693978 | 554590 | |
| Geekbench Single | 1037 | 727 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 2386 | 2047 | |
| Display | 6.7" AMOLED | 6.7" Super AMOLED | |
| Resolution | 1080x2400 | 1080x2340 | |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 90 Hz | |
| Battery | 5000 mAh | 5000 mAh | |
| Charging | 33W | 25W | |
| Main camera | 50 MP | 50 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 0 MP | 5 MP | |
| Front camera | 8 MP | 13 MP | |
| RAM | 6GB | 4GB / 6GB / 8GB | |
| Storage | 128GB | 128GB / 256GB | |
| OS | Android 15 | Android 15 / One UI 7 | |
| Brightness (peak) | 800 nits | 800 nits | |
| NFC | no | yes | |
| Protection | IP64 | IP54 | |
| Dimensions | 163.2×76.1×7.6 mm | 164.4×77.9×7.5 mm | |
| Weight | 174 g | 190 g | |
| Launch price | $139 | $147 |
Camera comparison
Lava Blaze Amoled 2
- Main: 50MP
- Front: 8MP
Samsung Galaxy A17
- Main: 50MP f/1.8
- Ultrawide: 5MP
- Front: 13MP
Display comparison
Lava Blaze Amoled 2
- 6.7" AMOLED
- Resolution: 1080x2400
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Samsung Galaxy A17
- 6.7" Super AMOLED
- Resolution: 1080x2340
- Refresh rate: 90 Hz
Battery and charging
Lava Blaze Amoled 2
- 5000 mAh
- Wired: 33W
- No wireless charging
Samsung Galaxy A17
- 5000 mAh
- Wired: 25W
- No wireless charging
Overall performance score
We compared Lava Blaze Amoled 2 and Samsung Galaxy A17, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Lava Blaze Amoled 2 leads Samsung Galaxy A17 by 25.1% in our overall performance rating.
Benchmarks
Launch prices and where to check today's
Launch price difference: $8. Lava Blaze Amoled 2 was $8 cheaper at launch.
Detailed category analysis
performance
In the "performance" category, the Lava Blaze Amoled 2 is a bit better (51/100 vs 43/100).
display
In the "display" category, the Lava Blaze Amoled 2 is a bit better (79/100 vs 67/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the Samsung Galaxy A17 and the Lava Blaze Amoled 2 are nearly equal (33/100 vs 30/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Lava Blaze Amoled 2 and the Samsung Galaxy A17 are nearly equal (46/100 vs 44/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, the Lava Blaze Amoled 2 is a bit better (79/100 vs 70/100).
Frequently asked questions
Which is better: the Lava Blaze Amoled 2 or the Samsung Galaxy A17?
The Lava Blaze Amoled 2 edges out the Samsung Galaxy A17 by just 5 points — the two devices are very close in overall level.
What is the rating of the Lava Blaze Amoled 2 and the Samsung Galaxy A17?
The Lava Blaze Amoled 2 has a MobileRank rating of 50/100, the Samsung Galaxy A17 — 45/100.
Which is more powerful: the Lava Blaze Amoled 2 or the Samsung Galaxy A17?
The Lava Blaze Amoled 2 leads on performance (51/100 vs 43/100).
Should you choose the Lava Blaze Amoled 2 over the Samsung Galaxy A17?
The Lava Blaze Amoled 2 is a better fit for budget-conscious buyers.