Lava Blaze Amoled 2 vs Samsung Galaxy S25+
The Lava Blaze Amoled 2 (2025) runs on the MediaTek Dimensity 7060, while the Samsung Galaxy S25+ (2025) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite; launch prices were $139 and $999. By overall MobileRank rating, the Samsung Galaxy S25+ leads — 71/100 vs 50/100 (a 21-point difference). Key differences: the Lava Blaze Amoled 2 has the bigger battery (5000 mAh vs 4900); the Samsung Galaxy S25+ is faster in AnTuTu (3,219,688 vs 693,978); the Samsung Galaxy S25+ has NFC for contactless payments, the Lava Blaze Amoled 2 doesn't; the Lava Blaze Amoled 2 is noticeably lighter (174g vs 190g).
Profile comparison
Category scores
Lava Blaze Amoled 2
Samsung Galaxy S25+
What makes Lava Blaze Amoled 2 better?
- Bigger battery: 5000 vs 4900 mAh
- Lighter: 174g vs 190g
- Cheaper at launch: $139 vs $999
- Better portability (79/100 vs 72/100)
What makes Samsung Galaxy S25+ better?
- Higher AnTuTu: 3219688 vs 693978
- Better Geekbench Single: 3050 vs 1037
- Better Geekbench Multi: 9700 vs 2386
- Faster charging: 45W vs 33W
- Higher performance (92/100 vs 51/100)
- Better camera (40/100 vs 30/100)
- Longer battery life (54/100 vs 46/100)
- Better display (89/100 vs 79/100)
Comparison verdict
Comparing the Lava Blaze Amoled 2 vs the Samsung Galaxy S25+, the Samsung Galaxy S25+ scores 21 points higher (71/100 vs 50/100). In the "performance" category, the Samsung Galaxy S25+ leads (92/100 vs 51/100). In the "camera" category, the Samsung Galaxy S25+ leads (40/100 vs 30/100). Value score: Lava Blaze Amoled 2 — 78/100, Samsung Galaxy S25+ — 52/100; it shows how far a model sits above or below the usual level for its price, and is not part of the overall rating. In the "performance" category, the Samsung Galaxy S25+ significantly outperforms the Lava Blaze Amoled 2 (92/100 vs 51/100). In the "display" category, the Samsung Galaxy S25+ is a bit better (89/100 vs 79/100). In the "camera" category, the Samsung Galaxy S25+ is a bit better (40/100 vs 30/100). In the "battery" category, the Samsung Galaxy S25+ is a bit better (54/100 vs 46/100). In the "portability" category, the Lava Blaze Amoled 2 is a bit better (79/100 vs 72/100).
Specs comparison
| Specification | Lava Blaze Amoled 2 | Samsung Galaxy S25+ | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | MediaTek Dimensity 7060 | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite | |
| AnTuTu | 693978 | 3219688 | |
| Geekbench Single | 1037 | 3050 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 2386 | 9700 | |
| Display | 6.7" AMOLED | 6.7" Dynamic AMOLED 2X | |
| Resolution | 1080x2400 | 3120x1440 | |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz | |
| Battery | 5000 mAh | 4900 mAh | |
| Charging | 33W | 45W | |
| Wireless charging | 0W | 15W | |
| Main camera | 50 MP | 50 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 0 MP | 12 MP | |
| Telephoto | 0 MP | 10 MP | |
| Front camera | 8 MP | 12 MP | |
| RAM | 6GB | 12GB | |
| Storage | 128GB | 256GB / 512GB | |
| OS | Android 15 | Android 15 / One UI 7 | |
| Brightness (peak) | 800 nits | 2600 nits | |
| NFC | no | yes | |
| Protection | IP64 | IP68 | |
| Dimensions | 163.2×76.1×7.6 mm | 158.4×75.8×7.3 mm | |
| Weight | 174 g | 190 g | |
| Launch price | $139 | $999 |
Camera comparison
Lava Blaze Amoled 2
- Main: 50MP
- Front: 8MP
Samsung Galaxy S25+
- Main: 50MP f/1.8
- Ultrawide: 12MP
- Telephoto: 10MP
- Front: 12MP
Display comparison
Lava Blaze Amoled 2
- 6.7" AMOLED
- Resolution: 1080x2400
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Samsung Galaxy S25+
- 6.7" Dynamic AMOLED 2X
- Resolution: 3120x1440
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Battery and charging
Lava Blaze Amoled 2
- 5000 mAh
- Wired: 33W
- No wireless charging
Samsung Galaxy S25+
- 4900 mAh
- Wired: 45W
- Wireless: 15W
Overall performance score
We compared Lava Blaze Amoled 2 and Samsung Galaxy S25+, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Samsung Galaxy S25+ leads Lava Blaze Amoled 2 by 78.4% in our overall performance rating.
Benchmarks
Launch prices and where to check today's
Launch price difference: $860. Lava Blaze Amoled 2 was $860 cheaper at launch.
Detailed category analysis
performance
In the "performance" category, the Samsung Galaxy S25+ significantly outperforms the Lava Blaze Amoled 2 (92/100 vs 51/100).
display
In the "display" category, the Samsung Galaxy S25+ is a bit better (89/100 vs 79/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the Samsung Galaxy S25+ is a bit better (40/100 vs 30/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Samsung Galaxy S25+ is a bit better (54/100 vs 46/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, the Lava Blaze Amoled 2 is a bit better (79/100 vs 72/100).
Frequently asked questions
Which is better: the Lava Blaze Amoled 2 or the Samsung Galaxy S25+?
The Samsung Galaxy S25+ significantly outperforms the Lava Blaze Amoled 2 by 21 points (71/100 vs 50/100).
What is the rating of the Lava Blaze Amoled 2 and the Samsung Galaxy S25+?
The Lava Blaze Amoled 2 has a MobileRank rating of 50/100, the Samsung Galaxy S25+ — 71/100.
Which has the better camera: the Lava Blaze Amoled 2 or the Samsung Galaxy S25+?
The Samsung Galaxy S25+ leads on camera score (40/100 vs 30/100).
Which is more powerful: the Lava Blaze Amoled 2 or the Samsung Galaxy S25+?
The Samsung Galaxy S25+ leads on performance (92/100 vs 51/100).
Should you choose the Lava Blaze Amoled 2 over the Samsung Galaxy S25+?
The Lava Blaze Amoled 2 is a better fit for budget-conscious buyers. The Samsung Galaxy S25+ is a better fit for gamers and power users.