Motorola Razr 50 Ultra vs Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra
The Motorola Razr 50 Ultra (2024) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3, while the Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra (2025) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite. By overall MobileRank rating, the Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra leads — 80/100 vs 66/100 (a 14-point difference). Key differences: the Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra has the bigger battery (5000 mAh vs 4000); the main camera is 50 MP vs 200 MP; the Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra is faster in AnTuTu (3,128,552 vs 1,797,821); the Motorola Razr 50 Ultra is noticeably lighter (189g vs 218g).
Profile comparison
Category scores
Motorola Razr 50 Ultra
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra
What makes Motorola Razr 50 Ultra better?
- Higher refresh rate: 165Hz vs 120Hz
- Lighter: 189g vs 218g
- Better display (91/100 vs 88/100)
- Better portability (75/100 vs 46/100)
What makes Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra better?
- Higher AnTuTu: 3128552 vs 1797821
- Better Geekbench Single: 3100 vs 1923
- Better Geekbench Multi: 9760 vs 5179
- Bigger battery: 5000 vs 4000 mAh
- Better main camera: 200MP vs 50MP
- Higher performance (92/100 vs 75/100)
- Better camera (81/100 vs 58/100)
- Longer battery life (56/100 vs 36/100)
Comparison verdict
Comparing the Motorola Razr 50 Ultra vs the Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra, the Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra scores 14 points higher (80/100 vs 66/100). In the "performance" category, the Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra leads (92/100 vs 75/100). In the "camera" category, the Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra leads (81/100 vs 58/100). In the "battery" category, the Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra leads (56/100 vs 36/100). In the "performance" category, the Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra notably outperforms the Motorola Razr 50 Ultra (92/100 vs 75/100). In the "display" category, the Motorola Razr 50 Ultra and the Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra are nearly equal (91/100 vs 88/100). In the "camera" category, the Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra notably outperforms the Motorola Razr 50 Ultra (81/100 vs 58/100). In the "battery" category, the Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra notably outperforms the Motorola Razr 50 Ultra (56/100 vs 36/100). In the "portability" category, the Motorola Razr 50 Ultra notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra (75/100 vs 46/100).
Specs comparison
| Specification | Motorola Razr 50 Ultra | Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3 | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite | |
| AnTuTu | 1797821 | 3128552 | |
| Geekbench Single | 1923 | 3100 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 5179 | 9760 | |
| Display | 6.9" Foldable LTPO AMOLED | 6.9" Dynamic AMOLED 2X | |
| Resolution | 1080x2640 | 3120x1440 | |
| Refresh rate | 165 Hz | 120 Hz | |
| Battery | 4000 mAh | 5000 mAh | |
| Charging | 45W | 45W | |
| Wireless charging | 15W | 15W | |
| DXOMark (camera) | — | 151 | |
| Main camera | 50 MP | 200 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 0 MP | 50 MP | |
| Telephoto | 50 MP | 50 MP | |
| Front camera | 32 MP | 12 MP | |
| RAM | 8GB / 12GB | 12GB / 16GB | |
| Storage | 256GB / 512GB | 256GB / 512GB / 1TB | |
| OS | Android 14, up to 3 major Android upgrades | Android 15 / One UI 7 | |
| Brightness (peak) | 3000 nits | 2600 nits | |
| NFC | yes | yes | |
| Protection | IPX8 | IP68 | |
| Dimensions | 171.4×74.0×7.1 mm | 162.8×77.6×8.2 mm | |
| Weight | 189 g | 218 g | |
| Launch price | — | $1299 |
Camera comparison
Motorola Razr 50 Ultra
- Main: 50MP f/1.7
- Telephoto: 50MP
- Front: 32MP
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra
- Main: 200MP f/1.7
- Ultrawide: 50MP
- Telephoto: 50MP
- Front: 12MP
Display comparison
Motorola Razr 50 Ultra
- 6.9" Foldable LTPO AMOLED
- Resolution: 1080x2640
- Refresh rate: 165 Hz
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra
- 6.9" Dynamic AMOLED 2X
- Resolution: 3120x1440
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Battery and charging
Motorola Razr 50 Ultra
- 4000 mAh
- Wired: 45W
- Wireless: 15W
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra
- 5000 mAh
- NanoReview test: web browsing 11:10 hrs, total 28:43 hrs
- Wired: 45W
- Wireless: 15W
Overall performance score
We compared Motorola Razr 50 Ultra and Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra leads Motorola Razr 50 Ultra by 42.5% in our overall performance rating.
Benchmarks
Launch prices and where to check today's
Motorola Razr 50 Ultra
Price unknownDetailed category analysis
performance
In the "performance" category, the Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra notably outperforms the Motorola Razr 50 Ultra (92/100 vs 75/100).
display
In the "display" category, the Motorola Razr 50 Ultra and the Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra are nearly equal (91/100 vs 88/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra notably outperforms the Motorola Razr 50 Ultra (81/100 vs 58/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra notably outperforms the Motorola Razr 50 Ultra (56/100 vs 36/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, the Motorola Razr 50 Ultra notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra (75/100 vs 46/100).
Frequently asked questions
Which is better: the Motorola Razr 50 Ultra or the Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra?
The Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra is noticeably better than the Motorola Razr 50 Ultra — the overall rating gap is 14 points.
What is the rating of the Motorola Razr 50 Ultra and the Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra?
The Motorola Razr 50 Ultra has a MobileRank rating of 66/100, the Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra — 80/100.
Which has the better camera: the Motorola Razr 50 Ultra or the Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra?
The Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra leads on camera score (81/100 vs 58/100).
Which is more powerful: the Motorola Razr 50 Ultra or the Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra?
The Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra leads on performance (92/100 vs 75/100).
Should you choose the Motorola Razr 50 Ultra over the Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra?
The Motorola Razr 50 Ultra is a better fit for active users. The Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts.