Motorola Razr 40 vs Samsung Galaxy S25 Slim
Comparing the Motorola Razr 40 (2023) and the Samsung Galaxy S25 Slim (2024) on specs and benchmarks. By overall MobileRank rating, the Samsung Galaxy S25 Slim leads — 37/100 vs 34/100 (a 3-point difference). Key differences: the main camera is 64 MP vs 200 MP.
Motorola Razr 40
Samsung Galaxy S25 Slim
- Higher refresh rate: 144Hz vs 120Hz
- Higher performance (1/100 vs 0/100)
- Longer battery life (20/100 vs 0/100)
- Better design/ergonomics (65/100 vs 50/100)
- Better value for money (69/100 vs 55/100)
- Better main camera: 200MP vs 64MP
- Better camera (81/100 vs 48/100)
Comparing the Motorola Razr 40 vs the Samsung Galaxy S25 Slim, the Samsung Galaxy S25 Slim scores 3 points higher (37/100 vs 34/100). In the "camera" category, the Samsung Galaxy S25 Slim leads (81/100 vs 48/100). In the "battery" category, the Motorola Razr 40 leads (20/100 vs 0/100). In the "value for money" category, the Motorola Razr 40 leads (69/100 vs 55/100). In the "performance" category, the Motorola Razr 40 and the Samsung Galaxy S25 Slim are nearly equal (1/100 vs 0/100). In the "display" category, both devices are on the same level — 100/100. In the "camera" category, the Samsung Galaxy S25 Slim significantly outperforms the Motorola Razr 40 (81/100 vs 48/100). In the "battery" category, the Motorola Razr 40 notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy S25 Slim (20/100 vs 0/100). In the "design" category, the Motorola Razr 40 notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy S25 Slim (65/100 vs 50/100). In the "value for money" category, the Motorola Razr 40 is a bit better (69/100 vs 55/100).
| Specification | Motorola Razr 40 | Samsung Galaxy S25 Slim | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 1 | — | |
| AnTuTu | 840330 | — | |
| Geekbench Single | 1039 | — | |
| Geekbench Multi | 2885 | — | |
| Display | 6.9" Foldable LTPO AMOLED | 6.7" OLED | |
| Resolution | 1080x2640 | 1080x2400 | |
| Refresh rate | 144 Hz | 120 Hz | |
| Battery | 4200 mAh | — | |
| Charging | 30W | — | |
| Wireless charging | 5W | 0W | |
| Main camera | 64 MP | 200 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 13 MP | 50 MP | |
| Telephoto | 0 MP | 50 MP | |
| Front camera | 32 MP | 10 MP | |
| RAM | 8GB / 12GB | 8GB | |
| Storage | 128GB / 256GB | 128GB / 256GB / 512GB | |
| OS | Android 13, up to 3 major Android upgrades | Android 15, One UI 7 | |
| Brightness (peak) | 1400 nits | — | |
| NFC | yes | yes | |
| Protection | — | IP68 | |
| Dimensions | 170.8×74.0×7.4 mm | — | |
| Weight | 188 g | — | |
| Price | $586 | — |
Motorola Razr 40
- Main: 64MP f/f/1.7
- Ultrawide: 13MP
- Front: 32MP
Samsung Galaxy S25 Slim
- Main: 200MP
- Ultrawide: 50MP
- Telephoto: 50MP
- Front: 10MP
Motorola Razr 40
- 6.9" Foldable LTPO AMOLED
- Resolution: 1080x2640
- Refresh rate: 144 Hz
Samsung Galaxy S25 Slim
- 6.7" OLED
- Resolution: 1080x2400
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Motorola Razr 40
- 4200 mAh
- Wired: 30W
- Wireless: 5W
Samsung Galaxy S25 Slim
- —
- No wireless charging
Samsung Galaxy S25 Slim
Price unknownperformance
In the "performance" category, the Motorola Razr 40 and the Samsung Galaxy S25 Slim are nearly equal (1/100 vs 0/100).
display
In the "display" category, both devices are on the same level — 100/100.
camera
In the "camera" category, the Samsung Galaxy S25 Slim significantly outperforms the Motorola Razr 40 (81/100 vs 48/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Motorola Razr 40 notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy S25 Slim (20/100 vs 0/100).
design
In the "design" category, the Motorola Razr 40 notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy S25 Slim (65/100 vs 50/100).
value for money
In the "value for money" category, the Motorola Razr 40 is a bit better (69/100 vs 55/100).
Which is better: the Motorola Razr 40 or the Samsung Galaxy S25 Slim?
The Samsung Galaxy S25 Slim edges out the Motorola Razr 40 by just 3 points — the two devices are very close in overall level.
What is the rating of the Motorola Razr 40 and the Samsung Galaxy S25 Slim?
The Motorola Razr 40 has a MobileRank rating of 34/100, the Samsung Galaxy S25 Slim — 37/100.
Which has the better camera: the Motorola Razr 40 or the Samsung Galaxy S25 Slim?
The Samsung Galaxy S25 Slim leads on camera score (81/100 vs 48/100).
Should you choose the Motorola Razr 40 over the Samsung Galaxy S25 Slim?
The Motorola Razr 40 is a better fit for everyday use. The Samsung Galaxy S25 Slim is a better fit for mobile photography enthusiasts.