Motorola Razr 40 vs Samsung Galaxy S25 Slim

Comparing the Motorola Razr 40 (2023) and the Samsung Galaxy S25 Slim (2024) on specs and benchmarks. By overall MobileRank rating, the Samsung Galaxy S25 Slim leads — 37/100 vs 34/100 (a 3-point difference). Key differences: the main camera is 64 MP vs 200 MP.

The Samsung Galaxy S25 Slim edges out the Motorola Razr 40 by just 3 points — the two devices are very close in overall level.
Profile comparison
Category scores
Motorola Razr 40
Performance 1
Display 100
Camera 48
Battery 20
Design 65
Value for money 69
Samsung Galaxy S25 Slim
Performance 0
Display 100
Camera 81
Battery 0
Design 50
Value for money 55
What makes Motorola Razr 40 better?
  • Higher refresh rate: 144Hz vs 120Hz

  • Higher performance (1/100 vs 0/100)
  • Longer battery life (20/100 vs 0/100)
  • Better design/ergonomics (65/100 vs 50/100)
  • Better value for money (69/100 vs 55/100)
What makes Samsung Galaxy S25 Slim better?
  • Better main camera: 200MP vs 64MP

  • Better camera (81/100 vs 48/100)
Comparison verdict

Comparing the Motorola Razr 40 vs the Samsung Galaxy S25 Slim, the Samsung Galaxy S25 Slim scores 3 points higher (37/100 vs 34/100). In the "camera" category, the Samsung Galaxy S25 Slim leads (81/100 vs 48/100). In the "battery" category, the Motorola Razr 40 leads (20/100 vs 0/100). In the "value for money" category, the Motorola Razr 40 leads (69/100 vs 55/100). In the "performance" category, the Motorola Razr 40 and the Samsung Galaxy S25 Slim are nearly equal (1/100 vs 0/100). In the "display" category, both devices are on the same level — 100/100. In the "camera" category, the Samsung Galaxy S25 Slim significantly outperforms the Motorola Razr 40 (81/100 vs 48/100). In the "battery" category, the Motorola Razr 40 notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy S25 Slim (20/100 vs 0/100). In the "design" category, the Motorola Razr 40 notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy S25 Slim (65/100 vs 50/100). In the "value for money" category, the Motorola Razr 40 is a bit better (69/100 vs 55/100).

Motorola Razr 40: The Motorola Razr 40 is a better fit for everyday use.
Samsung Galaxy S25 Slim: The Samsung Galaxy S25 Slim is a better fit for mobile photography enthusiasts.
Specs comparison
Specification Motorola Razr 40 Samsung Galaxy S25 Slim
Processor Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 1
AnTuTu 840330
Geekbench Single 1039
Geekbench Multi 2885
Display 6.9" Foldable LTPO AMOLED 6.7" OLED
Resolution 1080x2640 1080x2400
Refresh rate 144 Hz 120 Hz
Battery 4200 mAh
Charging 30W
Wireless charging 5W 0W
Main camera 64 MP 200 MP
Ultrawide 13 MP 50 MP
Telephoto 0 MP 50 MP
Front camera 32 MP 10 MP
RAM 8GB / 12GB 8GB
Storage 128GB / 256GB 128GB / 256GB / 512GB
OS Android 13, up to 3 major Android upgrades Android 15, One UI 7
Brightness (peak) 1400 nits
NFC yes yes
Protection IP68
Dimensions 170.8×74.0×7.4 mm
Weight 188 g
Price $586
Camera comparison
Motorola Razr 40
  • Main: 64MP f/f/1.7
  • Ultrawide: 13MP
  • Front: 32MP
48
camera
Samsung Galaxy S25 Slim
  • Main: 200MP
  • Ultrawide: 50MP
  • Telephoto: 50MP
  • Front: 10MP
81
camera
Display comparison
Motorola Razr 40
  • 6.9" Foldable LTPO AMOLED
  • Resolution: 1080x2640
  • Refresh rate: 144 Hz
100
display
Samsung Galaxy S25 Slim
  • 6.7" OLED
  • Resolution: 1080x2400
  • Refresh rate: 120 Hz
100
display
Battery and charging
Motorola Razr 40
  • 4200 mAh
  • Wired: 30W
  • Wireless: 5W
20
battery
Samsung Galaxy S25 Slim
  • No wireless charging
0
battery
Benchmarks
Price and availability
Motorola Razr 40
$586
Samsung Galaxy S25 Slim
Price unknown
Detailed category analysis
performance

In the "performance" category, the Motorola Razr 40 and the Samsung Galaxy S25 Slim are nearly equal (1/100 vs 0/100).

display

In the "display" category, both devices are on the same level — 100/100.

camera

In the "camera" category, the Samsung Galaxy S25 Slim significantly outperforms the Motorola Razr 40 (81/100 vs 48/100).

battery

In the "battery" category, the Motorola Razr 40 notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy S25 Slim (20/100 vs 0/100).

design

In the "design" category, the Motorola Razr 40 notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy S25 Slim (65/100 vs 50/100).

value for money

In the "value for money" category, the Motorola Razr 40 is a bit better (69/100 vs 55/100).

Frequently asked questions
Which is better: the Motorola Razr 40 or the Samsung Galaxy S25 Slim?

The Samsung Galaxy S25 Slim edges out the Motorola Razr 40 by just 3 points — the two devices are very close in overall level.

What is the rating of the Motorola Razr 40 and the Samsung Galaxy S25 Slim?

The Motorola Razr 40 has a MobileRank rating of 34/100, the Samsung Galaxy S25 Slim — 37/100.

Which has the better camera: the Motorola Razr 40 or the Samsung Galaxy S25 Slim?

The Samsung Galaxy S25 Slim leads on camera score (81/100 vs 48/100).

Should you choose the Motorola Razr 40 over the Samsung Galaxy S25 Slim?

The Motorola Razr 40 is a better fit for everyday use. The Samsung Galaxy S25 Slim is a better fit for mobile photography enthusiasts.