Samsung Galaxy S25 Slim vs ZTE Blade A52
Comparing the Samsung Galaxy S25 Slim (2024) and the ZTE Blade A52 (2022) on specs and benchmarks. By overall MobileRank rating, the Samsung Galaxy S25 Slim leads — 37/100 vs 9/100 (a 28-point difference). Key differences: the main camera is 200 MP vs 13 MP.
Samsung Galaxy S25 Slim
ZTE Blade A52
- Better main camera: 200MP vs 13MP
- Better camera (81/100 vs 0/100)
- Better display (100/100 vs 0/100)
- Better design/ergonomics (50/100 vs 32/100)
- Longer battery life (36/100 vs 0/100)
Comparing the Samsung Galaxy S25 Slim vs the ZTE Blade A52, the Samsung Galaxy S25 Slim scores 28 points higher (37/100 vs 9/100). In the "camera" category, the Samsung Galaxy S25 Slim leads (81/100 vs 0/100). In the "battery" category, the ZTE Blade A52 leads (36/100 vs 0/100). In the "performance" category, both devices are on the same level — 0/100. In the "display" category, the Samsung Galaxy S25 Slim significantly outperforms the ZTE Blade A52 (100/100 vs 0/100). In the "camera" category, the Samsung Galaxy S25 Slim significantly outperforms the ZTE Blade A52 (81/100 vs 0/100). In the "battery" category, the ZTE Blade A52 significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy S25 Slim (36/100 vs 0/100). In the "design" category, the Samsung Galaxy S25 Slim notably outperforms the ZTE Blade A52 (50/100 vs 32/100). In the "value for money" category, both devices are on the same level — 55/100.
| Specification | Samsung Galaxy S25 Slim | ZTE Blade A52 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | — | Unisoc | |
| AnTuTu | — | — | |
| Geekbench Single | — | — | |
| Geekbench Multi | — | — | |
| Display | 6.7" OLED | 6.5" IPS LCD | |
| Resolution | 1080x2400 | 720x1600 | |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | — | |
| Battery | — | 5000 mAh | |
| Charging | — | — | |
| Main camera | 200 MP | 13 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 50 MP | 0 MP | |
| Telephoto | 50 MP | 0 MP | |
| Front camera | 10 MP | 5 MP | |
| RAM | 8GB | 2GB | |
| Storage | 128GB / 256GB / 512GB | 32GB / 64GB | |
| OS | Android 15, One UI 7 | Android 11 | |
| NFC | yes | yes | |
| Protection | IP68 | — | |
| Dimensions | — | 168.0×77.5×9.4 mm | |
| Weight | — | 214 g | |
| Price | — | — |
Samsung Galaxy S25 Slim
- Main: 200MP
- Ultrawide: 50MP
- Telephoto: 50MP
- Front: 10MP
ZTE Blade A52
- Main: 13MP
- Front: 5MP
Samsung Galaxy S25 Slim
- 6.7" OLED
- Resolution: 1080x2400
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
ZTE Blade A52
- 6.5" IPS LCD
- Resolution: 720x1600
- Refresh rate: —
Samsung Galaxy S25 Slim
- —
- No wireless charging
ZTE Blade A52
- 5000 mAh
- No wireless charging
performance
In the "performance" category, both devices are on the same level — 0/100.
display
In the "display" category, the Samsung Galaxy S25 Slim significantly outperforms the ZTE Blade A52 (100/100 vs 0/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the Samsung Galaxy S25 Slim significantly outperforms the ZTE Blade A52 (81/100 vs 0/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the ZTE Blade A52 significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy S25 Slim (36/100 vs 0/100).
design
In the "design" category, the Samsung Galaxy S25 Slim notably outperforms the ZTE Blade A52 (50/100 vs 32/100).
value for money
In the "value for money" category, both devices are on the same level — 55/100.
Which is better: the Samsung Galaxy S25 Slim or the ZTE Blade A52?
The Samsung Galaxy S25 Slim significantly outperforms the ZTE Blade A52 by 28 points (37/100 vs 9/100).
What is the rating of the Samsung Galaxy S25 Slim and the ZTE Blade A52?
The Samsung Galaxy S25 Slim has a MobileRank rating of 37/100, the ZTE Blade A52 — 9/100.
Which has the better camera: the Samsung Galaxy S25 Slim or the ZTE Blade A52?
The Samsung Galaxy S25 Slim leads on camera score (81/100 vs 0/100).
Should you choose the Samsung Galaxy S25 Slim over the ZTE Blade A52?
The Samsung Galaxy S25 Slim is a better fit for mobile photography enthusiasts. The ZTE Blade A52 is a better fit for everyday use.