Motorola Moto S30 Pro vs Vivo X300 Ultra

The Motorola Moto S30 Pro (2022) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 888+ 5G, while the Vivo X300 Ultra (2026) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5. By overall MobileRank rating, the Vivo X300 Ultra leads — 91/100 vs 59/100 (a 32-point difference). Key differences: the Vivo X300 Ultra has the bigger battery (7000 mAh vs 4400); the main camera is 50 MP vs 200 MP; the Vivo X300 Ultra is faster in AnTuTu (4,247,433 vs 1,208,784); the Motorola Moto S30 Pro is noticeably lighter (172g vs 230g).

The Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Motorola Moto S30 Pro by 32 points (91/100 vs 59/100).
Profile comparison
Category scores
Motorola Moto S30 Pro
Performance 66
Display 90
Camera 42
Battery 40
Portability 81
Value for money
Vivo X300 Ultra
Performance 99
Display 89
Camera 96
Battery 85
Portability 39
Value for money 94
What makes Motorola Moto S30 Pro better?
  • Higher refresh rate: 144Hz vs 120Hz
  • Lighter: 172g vs 230g

  • Better display (90/100 vs 89/100)
  • Better portability (81/100 vs 39/100)
What makes Vivo X300 Ultra better?
  • Higher AnTuTu: 4247433 vs 1208784
  • Better Geekbench Single: 3640 vs 1605
  • Better Geekbench Multi: 11033 vs 3996
  • Bigger battery: 7000 vs 4400 mAh
  • Faster charging: 100W vs 68W
  • Better main camera: 200MP vs 50MP

  • Higher performance (99/100 vs 66/100)
  • Better camera (96/100 vs 42/100)
  • Longer battery life (85/100 vs 40/100)
Comparison verdict

Comparing the Motorola Moto S30 Pro vs the Vivo X300 Ultra, the Vivo X300 Ultra scores 32 points higher (91/100 vs 59/100). In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra leads (99/100 vs 66/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra leads (96/100 vs 42/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra leads (85/100 vs 40/100). In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Motorola Moto S30 Pro (99/100 vs 66/100). In the "display" category, the Motorola Moto S30 Pro and the Vivo X300 Ultra are nearly equal (90/100 vs 89/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Motorola Moto S30 Pro (96/100 vs 42/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Motorola Moto S30 Pro (85/100 vs 40/100). In the "portability" category, the Motorola Moto S30 Pro significantly outperforms the Vivo X300 Ultra (81/100 vs 39/100).

Motorola Moto S30 Pro: The Motorola Moto S30 Pro is a better fit for active users.
Vivo X300 Ultra: The Vivo X300 Ultra is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.
Specs comparison
Specification Motorola Moto S30 Pro Vivo X300 Ultra
Processor Qualcomm Snapdragon 888+ 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5
AnTuTu 1208784 4247433
Geekbench Single 1605 3640
Geekbench Multi 3996 11033
Display 6.5" P-OLED 6.8" LTPO OLED
Resolution 1080x2400 3168x1440
Refresh rate 144 Hz 120 Hz
Battery 4400 mAh 7000 mAh
Charging 68W 100W
Wireless charging 0W 40W
DXOMark (camera) 170
Main camera 50 MP 200 MP
Ultrawide 13 MP 50 MP
Telephoto 0 MP 200 MP
Front camera 32 MP 32 MP
RAM 8GB / 12GB 12GB / 16GB
Storage 128GB / 256GB / 512GB 256GB / 512GB / 1TB
OS Android 12, MYUI 4.0 Android 16
NFC yes yes
Protection IP69
Dimensions 158.5×71.2×7.5 mm 163.0×76.8×8.2 mm
Weight 172 g 230 g
Launch price $950
Camera comparison
Motorola Moto S30 Pro
  • Main: 50MP f/f/1.8
  • Ultrawide: 13MP
  • Front: 32MP
42
camera
Vivo X300 Ultra
  • Main: 200MP f/f/1.6
  • Ultrawide: 50MP
  • Telephoto: 200MP
  • Front: 32MP
96
camera
Display comparison
Motorola Moto S30 Pro
  • 6.5" P-OLED
  • Resolution: 1080x2400
  • Refresh rate: 144 Hz
90
display
Vivo X300 Ultra
  • 6.8" LTPO OLED
  • Resolution: 3168x1440
  • Refresh rate: 120 Hz
89
display
Battery and charging
Motorola Moto S30 Pro
  • 4400 mAh
  • Wired: 68W
  • No wireless charging
40
battery
Vivo X300 Ultra
  • 7000 mAh
  • NanoReview test: web browsing 10:18 hrs, total 29:11 hrs
  • Wired: 100W
  • Wireless: 40W
85
battery
Overall performance score

We compared Motorola Moto S30 Pro and Vivo X300 Ultra, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.

Motorola Moto S30 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 888+ 5G
59/100
1208784 AnTuTu
Vivo X300 Ultra Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5
91/100 +71.5%
4247433 AnTuTu

Vivo X300 Ultra leads Motorola Moto S30 Pro by 71.5% in our overall performance rating.

Benchmarks
Launch prices and where to check today's
Motorola Moto S30 Pro
Price unknown
Vivo X300 Ultra
$950
Detailed category analysis
performance

In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Motorola Moto S30 Pro (99/100 vs 66/100).

display

In the "display" category, the Motorola Moto S30 Pro and the Vivo X300 Ultra are nearly equal (90/100 vs 89/100).

camera

In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Motorola Moto S30 Pro (96/100 vs 42/100).

battery

In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Motorola Moto S30 Pro (85/100 vs 40/100).

portability

In the "portability" category, the Motorola Moto S30 Pro significantly outperforms the Vivo X300 Ultra (81/100 vs 39/100).

Frequently asked questions
Which is better: the Motorola Moto S30 Pro or the Vivo X300 Ultra?

The Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Motorola Moto S30 Pro by 32 points (91/100 vs 59/100).

What is the rating of the Motorola Moto S30 Pro and the Vivo X300 Ultra?

The Motorola Moto S30 Pro has a MobileRank rating of 59/100, the Vivo X300 Ultra — 91/100.

Which has the better camera: the Motorola Moto S30 Pro or the Vivo X300 Ultra?

The Vivo X300 Ultra leads on camera score (96/100 vs 42/100).

Which is more powerful: the Motorola Moto S30 Pro or the Vivo X300 Ultra?

The Vivo X300 Ultra leads on performance (99/100 vs 66/100).

Should you choose the Motorola Moto S30 Pro over the Vivo X300 Ultra?

The Motorola Moto S30 Pro is a better fit for active users. The Vivo X300 Ultra is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.