Motorola Moto G67 vs Vivo X300 Ultra
The Motorola Moto G67 (2026) runs on the MediaTek Dimensity 6300, while the Vivo X300 Ultra (2026) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5; launch prices were $240 and $950. By overall MobileRank rating, the Vivo X300 Ultra leads — 91/100 vs 51/100 (a 40-point difference). Key differences: the Vivo X300 Ultra has the bigger battery (7000 mAh vs 5200); the main camera is 50 MP vs 200 MP; the Vivo X300 Ultra is faster in AnTuTu (4,247,433 vs 528,398); the Motorola Moto G67 is noticeably lighter (182g vs 230g).
Profile comparison
Category scores
Motorola Moto G67
Vivo X300 Ultra
What makes Motorola Moto G67 better?
- Lighter: 182g vs 230g
- Cheaper at launch: $240 vs $950
- Better portability (77/100 vs 39/100)
What makes Vivo X300 Ultra better?
- Higher AnTuTu: 4247433 vs 528398
- Better Geekbench Single: 3639 vs 771
- Better Geekbench Multi: 11047 vs 1980
- Bigger battery: 7000 vs 5200 mAh
- Faster charging: 100W vs 30W
- Better main camera: 200MP vs 50MP
- Higher performance (99/100 vs 43/100)
- Better camera (96/100 vs 40/100)
- Longer battery life (85/100 vs 50/100)
- Better display (89/100 vs 84/100)
Comparison verdict
Comparing the Motorola Moto G67 vs the Vivo X300 Ultra, the Vivo X300 Ultra scores 40 points higher (91/100 vs 51/100). In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra leads (99/100 vs 43/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra leads (96/100 vs 40/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra leads (85/100 vs 50/100). Value score: Motorola Moto G67 — 54/100, Vivo X300 Ultra — 94/100; it shows how far a model sits above or below the usual level for its price, and is not part of the overall rating. In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Motorola Moto G67 (99/100 vs 43/100). In the "display" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra is a bit better (89/100 vs 84/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Motorola Moto G67 (96/100 vs 40/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Motorola Moto G67 (85/100 vs 50/100). In the "portability" category, the Motorola Moto G67 significantly outperforms the Vivo X300 Ultra (77/100 vs 39/100).
Specs comparison
| Specification | Motorola Moto G67 | Vivo X300 Ultra | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | MediaTek Dimensity 6300 | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 | |
| AnTuTu | 528398 | 4247433 | |
| Geekbench Single | 771 | 3639 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 1980 | 11047 | |
| Display | 6.8" AMOLED | 6.8" LTPO OLED | |
| Resolution | 1272x2772 | 3168x1440 | |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz | |
| Battery | 5200 mAh | 7000 mAh | |
| Charging | 30W | 100W | |
| Wireless charging | 0W | 40W | |
| DXOMark (camera) | — | 170 | |
| Main camera | 50 MP | 200 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 8 MP | 50 MP | |
| Telephoto | 0 MP | 200 MP | |
| Front camera | 32 MP | 32 MP | |
| RAM | 4GB / 8GB | 12GB / 16GB | |
| Storage | 128GB / 256GB | 256GB / 512GB / 1TB | |
| OS | Android 16 | Android 16 | |
| Brightness (peak) | 5000 nits | — | |
| NFC | yes | yes | |
| Protection | IP64 | IP69 | |
| Dimensions | 164.2×77.4×7.3 mm | 163.0×76.8×8.2 mm | |
| Weight | 182 g | 230 g | |
| Launch price | $240 | $950 |
Camera comparison
Motorola Moto G67
- Main: 50MP f/1.8
- Ultrawide: 8MP
- Front: 32MP
Vivo X300 Ultra
- Main: 200MP f/1.6
- Ultrawide: 50MP
- Telephoto: 200MP
- Front: 32MP
Display comparison
Motorola Moto G67
- 6.8" AMOLED
- Resolution: 1272x2772
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Vivo X300 Ultra
- 6.8" LTPO OLED
- Resolution: 3168x1440
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Battery and charging
Motorola Moto G67
- 5200 mAh
- Wired: 30W
- No wireless charging
Vivo X300 Ultra
- 7000 mAh
- NanoReview test: web browsing 10:18 hrs, total 29:11 hrs
- Wired: 100W
- Wireless: 40W
Overall performance score
We compared Motorola Moto G67 and Vivo X300 Ultra, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Vivo X300 Ultra leads Motorola Moto G67 by 87.6% in our overall performance rating.
Benchmarks
Launch prices and where to check today's
Launch price difference: $710. Motorola Moto G67 was $710 cheaper at launch.
Detailed category analysis
performance
In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Motorola Moto G67 (99/100 vs 43/100).
display
In the "display" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra is a bit better (89/100 vs 84/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Motorola Moto G67 (96/100 vs 40/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Motorola Moto G67 (85/100 vs 50/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, the Motorola Moto G67 significantly outperforms the Vivo X300 Ultra (77/100 vs 39/100).
Frequently asked questions
Which is better: the Motorola Moto G67 or the Vivo X300 Ultra?
The Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Motorola Moto G67 by 40 points (91/100 vs 51/100).
What is the rating of the Motorola Moto G67 and the Vivo X300 Ultra?
The Motorola Moto G67 has a MobileRank rating of 51/100, the Vivo X300 Ultra — 91/100.
Which has the better camera: the Motorola Moto G67 or the Vivo X300 Ultra?
The Vivo X300 Ultra leads on camera score (96/100 vs 40/100).
Which is more powerful: the Motorola Moto G67 or the Vivo X300 Ultra?
The Vivo X300 Ultra leads on performance (99/100 vs 43/100).
Should you choose the Motorola Moto G67 over the Vivo X300 Ultra?
The Vivo X300 Ultra is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.