Motorola Moto G54 (China) vs Vivo X300 Ultra

The Motorola Moto G54 (China) (2023) runs on the MediaTek Dimensity 7020, while the Vivo X300 Ultra (2026) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5. By overall MobileRank rating, the Vivo X300 Ultra leads — 91/100 vs 47/100 (a 44-point difference). Key differences: the Vivo X300 Ultra has the bigger battery (7000 mAh vs 5000); the main camera is 50 MP vs 200 MP; the Vivo X300 Ultra is faster in AnTuTu (4,247,433 vs 639,509); the Motorola Moto G54 (China) is noticeably lighter (179g vs 230g).

The Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Motorola Moto G54 (China) by 44 points (91/100 vs 47/100).
Profile comparison
Category scores
Motorola Moto G54 (China)
Performance 48
Display 67
Camera 32
Battery 43
Portability 72
Value for money
Vivo X300 Ultra
Performance 99
Display 89
Camera 96
Battery 85
Portability 39
Value for money 94
What makes Motorola Moto G54 (China) better?
  • Lighter: 179g vs 230g

  • Better portability (72/100 vs 39/100)
What makes Vivo X300 Ultra better?
  • Higher AnTuTu: 4247433 vs 639509
  • Better Geekbench Single: 3640 vs 912
  • Better Geekbench Multi: 11033 vs 2244
  • Bigger battery: 7000 vs 5000 mAh
  • Faster charging: 100W vs 15W
  • Better main camera: 200MP vs 50MP

  • Higher performance (99/100 vs 48/100)
  • Better camera (96/100 vs 32/100)
  • Longer battery life (85/100 vs 43/100)
  • Better display (89/100 vs 67/100)
Comparison verdict

Comparing the Motorola Moto G54 (China) vs the Vivo X300 Ultra, the Vivo X300 Ultra scores 44 points higher (91/100 vs 47/100). In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra leads (99/100 vs 48/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra leads (96/100 vs 32/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra leads (85/100 vs 43/100). In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Motorola Moto G54 (China) (99/100 vs 48/100). In the "display" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra notably outperforms the Motorola Moto G54 (China) (89/100 vs 67/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Motorola Moto G54 (China) (96/100 vs 32/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Motorola Moto G54 (China) (85/100 vs 43/100). In the "portability" category, the Motorola Moto G54 (China) significantly outperforms the Vivo X300 Ultra (72/100 vs 39/100).

Motorola Moto G54 (China): The Motorola Moto G54 (China) is a better fit for everyday use.
Vivo X300 Ultra: The Vivo X300 Ultra is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.
Specs comparison
Specification Motorola Moto G54 (China) Vivo X300 Ultra
Processor MediaTek Dimensity 7020 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5
AnTuTu 639509 4247433
Geekbench Single 912 3640
Geekbench Multi 2244 11033
Display 6.5" IPS LCD 6.8" LTPO OLED
Resolution 1080x2400 3168x1440
Refresh rate 120 Hz 120 Hz
Battery 5000 mAh 7000 mAh
Charging 15W 100W
Wireless charging 0W 40W
DXOMark (camera) 170
Main camera 50 MP 200 MP
Ultrawide 0 MP 50 MP
Telephoto 0 MP 200 MP
Front camera 16 MP 32 MP
RAM 4GB / 8GB / 12GB 12GB / 16GB
Storage 128GB / 256GB 256GB / 512GB / 1TB
OS Android 13, planned upgrade to Android 14 Android 16
NFC yes yes
Protection IP69
Dimensions 161.6×73.8×8.0 mm 163.0×76.8×8.2 mm
Weight 179 g 230 g
Launch price $950
Camera comparison
Motorola Moto G54 (China)
  • Main: 50MP f/f/1.8
  • Front: 16MP
32
camera
Vivo X300 Ultra
  • Main: 200MP f/f/1.6
  • Ultrawide: 50MP
  • Telephoto: 200MP
  • Front: 32MP
96
camera
Display comparison
Motorola Moto G54 (China)
  • 6.5" IPS LCD
  • Resolution: 1080x2400
  • Refresh rate: 120 Hz
67
display
Vivo X300 Ultra
  • 6.8" LTPO OLED
  • Resolution: 3168x1440
  • Refresh rate: 120 Hz
89
display
Battery and charging
Motorola Moto G54 (China)
  • 5000 mAh
  • Wired: 15W
  • No wireless charging
43
battery
Vivo X300 Ultra
  • 7000 mAh
  • NanoReview test: web browsing 10:18 hrs, total 29:11 hrs
  • Wired: 100W
  • Wireless: 40W
85
battery
Overall performance score

We compared Motorola Moto G54 (China) and Vivo X300 Ultra, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.

Motorola Moto G54 (China) MediaTek Dimensity 7020
47/100
639509 AnTuTu
Vivo X300 Ultra Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5
91/100 +84.9%
4247433 AnTuTu

Vivo X300 Ultra leads Motorola Moto G54 (China) by 84.9% in our overall performance rating.

Benchmarks
Launch prices and where to check today's
Motorola Moto G54 (China)
Price unknown
Vivo X300 Ultra
$950
Detailed category analysis
performance

In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Motorola Moto G54 (China) (99/100 vs 48/100).

display

In the "display" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra notably outperforms the Motorola Moto G54 (China) (89/100 vs 67/100).

camera

In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Motorola Moto G54 (China) (96/100 vs 32/100).

battery

In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Motorola Moto G54 (China) (85/100 vs 43/100).

portability

In the "portability" category, the Motorola Moto G54 (China) significantly outperforms the Vivo X300 Ultra (72/100 vs 39/100).

Frequently asked questions
Which is better: the Motorola Moto G54 (China) or the Vivo X300 Ultra?

The Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Motorola Moto G54 (China) by 44 points (91/100 vs 47/100).

What is the rating of the Motorola Moto G54 (China) and the Vivo X300 Ultra?

The Motorola Moto G54 (China) has a MobileRank rating of 47/100, the Vivo X300 Ultra — 91/100.

Which has the better camera: the Motorola Moto G54 (China) or the Vivo X300 Ultra?

The Vivo X300 Ultra leads on camera score (96/100 vs 32/100).

Which is more powerful: the Motorola Moto G54 (China) or the Vivo X300 Ultra?

The Vivo X300 Ultra leads on performance (99/100 vs 48/100).

Should you choose the Motorola Moto G54 (China) over the Vivo X300 Ultra?

The Motorola Moto G54 (China) is a better fit for everyday use. The Vivo X300 Ultra is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.