Motorola Moto G Fast vs Vivo X300 Ultra

The Motorola Moto G Fast (2020) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, while the Vivo X300 Ultra (2026) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5. By overall MobileRank rating, the Vivo X300 Ultra leads — 91/100 vs 25/100 (a 66-point difference). Key differences: the Vivo X300 Ultra has the bigger battery (7000 mAh vs 4000); the main camera is 16 MP vs 200 MP; the Vivo X300 Ultra is faster in AnTuTu (4,247,433 vs 329,457); the Vivo X300 Ultra has NFC for contactless payments, the Motorola Moto G Fast doesn't; the Motorola Moto G Fast is noticeably lighter (189g vs 230g).

The Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Motorola Moto G Fast by 66 points (91/100 vs 25/100).
Profile comparison
Category scores
Motorola Moto G Fast
Performance 24
Display 39
Camera 15
Battery 22
Portability 54
Value for money
Vivo X300 Ultra
Performance 99
Display 89
Camera 96
Battery 85
Portability 39
Value for money 94
What makes Motorola Moto G Fast better?
  • Lighter: 189g vs 230g

  • Better portability (54/100 vs 39/100)
What makes Vivo X300 Ultra better?
  • Higher AnTuTu: 4247433 vs 329457
  • Better Geekbench Single: 3640 vs 321
  • Better Geekbench Multi: 11033 vs 1128
  • Bigger battery: 7000 vs 4000 mAh
  • Faster charging: 100W vs 10W
  • Better main camera: 200MP vs 16MP

  • Higher performance (99/100 vs 24/100)
  • Better camera (96/100 vs 15/100)
  • Longer battery life (85/100 vs 22/100)
  • Better display (89/100 vs 39/100)
Comparison verdict

Comparing the Motorola Moto G Fast vs the Vivo X300 Ultra, the Vivo X300 Ultra scores 66 points higher (91/100 vs 25/100). In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra leads (99/100 vs 24/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra leads (96/100 vs 15/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra leads (85/100 vs 22/100). In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Motorola Moto G Fast (99/100 vs 24/100). In the "display" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Motorola Moto G Fast (89/100 vs 39/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Motorola Moto G Fast (96/100 vs 15/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Motorola Moto G Fast (85/100 vs 22/100). In the "portability" category, the Motorola Moto G Fast notably outperforms the Vivo X300 Ultra (54/100 vs 39/100).

Motorola Moto G Fast: The Motorola Moto G Fast is a better fit for everyday use.
Vivo X300 Ultra: The Vivo X300 Ultra is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.
Specs comparison
Specification Motorola Moto G Fast Vivo X300 Ultra
Processor Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5
AnTuTu 329457 4247433
Geekbench Single 321 3640
Geekbench Multi 1128 11033
Display 6.4" IPS LCD 6.8" LTPO OLED
Resolution 720x1560 3168x1440
Refresh rate 120 Hz
Battery 4000 mAh 7000 mAh
Charging 10W 100W
Wireless charging 0W 40W
DXOMark (camera) 170
Main camera 16 MP 200 MP
Ultrawide 8 MP 50 MP
Telephoto 0 MP 200 MP
Front camera 8 MP 32 MP
RAM 3GB 12GB / 16GB
Storage 32GB 256GB / 512GB / 1TB
OS Android 10 Android 16
NFC no yes
Protection IP69
Dimensions 161.9×75.7×9.1 mm 163.0×76.8×8.2 mm
Weight 189 g 230 g
Launch price $950
Camera comparison
Motorola Moto G Fast
  • Main: 16MP f/f/1.7
  • Ultrawide: 8MP
  • Front: 8MP
15
camera
Vivo X300 Ultra
  • Main: 200MP f/f/1.6
  • Ultrawide: 50MP
  • Telephoto: 200MP
  • Front: 32MP
96
camera
Display comparison
Motorola Moto G Fast
  • 6.4" IPS LCD
  • Resolution: 720x1560
  • Refresh rate: —
39
display
Vivo X300 Ultra
  • 6.8" LTPO OLED
  • Resolution: 3168x1440
  • Refresh rate: 120 Hz
89
display
Battery and charging
Motorola Moto G Fast
  • 4000 mAh
  • Wired: 10W
  • No wireless charging
22
battery
Vivo X300 Ultra
  • 7000 mAh
  • NanoReview test: web browsing 10:18 hrs, total 29:11 hrs
  • Wired: 100W
  • Wireless: 40W
85
battery
Overall performance score

We compared Motorola Moto G Fast and Vivo X300 Ultra, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.

Motorola Moto G Fast Qualcomm Snapdragon 665
25/100
329457 AnTuTu
Vivo X300 Ultra Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5
91/100 +92.2%
4247433 AnTuTu

Vivo X300 Ultra leads Motorola Moto G Fast by 92.2% in our overall performance rating.

Benchmarks
Launch prices and where to check today's
Motorola Moto G Fast
Price unknown
Vivo X300 Ultra
$950
Detailed category analysis
performance

In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Motorola Moto G Fast (99/100 vs 24/100).

display

In the "display" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Motorola Moto G Fast (89/100 vs 39/100).

camera

In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Motorola Moto G Fast (96/100 vs 15/100).

battery

In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Motorola Moto G Fast (85/100 vs 22/100).

portability

In the "portability" category, the Motorola Moto G Fast notably outperforms the Vivo X300 Ultra (54/100 vs 39/100).

Frequently asked questions
Which is better: the Motorola Moto G Fast or the Vivo X300 Ultra?

The Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Motorola Moto G Fast by 66 points (91/100 vs 25/100).

What is the rating of the Motorola Moto G Fast and the Vivo X300 Ultra?

The Motorola Moto G Fast has a MobileRank rating of 25/100, the Vivo X300 Ultra — 91/100.

Which has the better camera: the Motorola Moto G Fast or the Vivo X300 Ultra?

The Vivo X300 Ultra leads on camera score (96/100 vs 15/100).

Which is more powerful: the Motorola Moto G Fast or the Vivo X300 Ultra?

The Vivo X300 Ultra leads on performance (99/100 vs 24/100).

Should you choose the Motorola Moto G Fast over the Vivo X300 Ultra?

The Motorola Moto G Fast is a better fit for everyday use. The Vivo X300 Ultra is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.