Motorola Edge 60 Pro vs Vivo X200 Ultra

The Motorola Edge 60 Pro (2025) runs on the MediaTek Dimensity 8350 Extreme, while the Vivo X200 Ultra (2025) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite; launch prices were $350 and $889. By overall MobileRank rating, the Vivo X200 Ultra leads — 86/100 vs 70/100 (a 16-point difference). Key differences: the Vivo X200 Ultra is faster in AnTuTu (3,092,340 vs 1,726,985); the Motorola Edge 60 Pro is noticeably lighter (186g vs 229g).

The Vivo X200 Ultra is noticeably better than the Motorola Edge 60 Pro — the overall rating gap is 16 points.

Profile comparison

Category scores

Motorola Edge 60 Pro

Performance 70
Display 83
Camera 64
Battery 73
Portability 65
Value for money 74

Vivo X200 Ultra

Performance 92
Display 89
Camera 93
Battery 78
Portability 34
Value for money 86

What makes Motorola Edge 60 Pro better?

  • Lighter: 186g vs 229g
  • Cheaper at launch: $350 vs $889

  • Better portability (65/100 vs 34/100)

What makes Vivo X200 Ultra better?

  • Higher AnTuTu: 3092340 vs 1726985
  • Better Geekbench Single: 3100 vs 1398
  • Better Geekbench Multi: 10095 vs 4313
  • Faster wireless charging: 40W vs 15W

  • Higher performance (92/100 vs 70/100)
  • Better camera (93/100 vs 64/100)
  • Longer battery life (78/100 vs 73/100)
  • Better display (89/100 vs 83/100)

Comparison verdict

Comparing the Motorola Edge 60 Pro vs the Vivo X200 Ultra, the Vivo X200 Ultra scores 16 points higher (86/100 vs 70/100). In the "performance" category, the Vivo X200 Ultra leads (92/100 vs 70/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo X200 Ultra leads (93/100 vs 64/100). Value score: Motorola Edge 60 Pro — 74/100, Vivo X200 Ultra — 86/100; it shows how far a model sits above or below the usual level for its price, and is not part of the overall rating. In the "performance" category, the Vivo X200 Ultra notably outperforms the Motorola Edge 60 Pro (92/100 vs 70/100). In the "display" category, the Vivo X200 Ultra is a bit better (89/100 vs 83/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo X200 Ultra notably outperforms the Motorola Edge 60 Pro (93/100 vs 64/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo X200 Ultra is a bit better (78/100 vs 73/100). In the "portability" category, the Motorola Edge 60 Pro significantly outperforms the Vivo X200 Ultra (65/100 vs 34/100).

Motorola Edge 60 Pro: The Motorola Edge 60 Pro is a better fit for active users.
Vivo X200 Ultra: The Vivo X200 Ultra is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.

Specs comparison

Specification Motorola Edge 60 Pro Vivo X200 Ultra
Processor MediaTek Dimensity 8350 Extreme Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite
AnTuTu 1726985 3092340
Geekbench Single 1398 3100
Geekbench Multi 4313 10095
Display 6.7" pOLED 6.8" LTPO AMOLED
Resolution 2712x1220 3168x1440
Refresh rate 120 Hz 120 Hz
Battery 6000 mAh 6000 mAh
Charging 90W 90W
Wireless charging 15W 40W
DXOMark (camera) — 167
Main camera 50 MP 50 MP
Ultrawide 50 MP 50 MP
Telephoto 10 MP 200 MP
Front camera 50 MP 50 MP
RAM 8GB / 12GB 12GB / 16GB
Storage 256GB / 512GB 256GB / 512GB / 1TB
OS Android 15 Android 15 / OriginOS 5
Brightness (peak) 4500 nits 4500 nits
NFC yes yes
Protection IP68/IP69 IP68
Dimensions 160.7×73.1×8.2 mm 163.1×76.8×8.7 mm
Weight 186 g 229 g
Launch price $350 $889

Camera comparison

Motorola Edge 60 Pro

  • Main: 50MP f/1.8
  • Ultrawide: 50MP
  • Telephoto: 10MP
  • Front: 50MP
64
camera

Vivo X200 Ultra

  • Main: 50MP f/1.7
  • Ultrawide: 50MP
  • Telephoto: 200MP
  • Front: 50MP
93
camera

Display comparison

Motorola Edge 60 Pro

  • 6.7" pOLED
  • Resolution: 2712x1220
  • Refresh rate: 120 Hz
83
display

Vivo X200 Ultra

  • 6.8" LTPO AMOLED
  • Resolution: 3168x1440
  • Refresh rate: 120 Hz
89
display

Battery and charging

Motorola Edge 60 Pro

  • 6000 mAh
  • NanoReview test: web browsing 12:38 hrs, total 24:17 hrs
  • Wired: 90W
  • Wireless: 15W
73
battery

Vivo X200 Ultra

  • 6000 mAh
  • NanoReview test: web browsing 12:14 hrs, total 24:25 hrs
  • Wired: 90W
  • Wireless: 40W
78
battery

Overall performance score

We compared Motorola Edge 60 Pro and Vivo X200 Ultra, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.

Motorola Edge 60 Pro MediaTek Dimensity 8350 Extreme
70/100
1726985 AnTuTu
Vivo X200 Ultra Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite
86/100 +44.2%
3092340 AnTuTu

Vivo X200 Ultra leads Motorola Edge 60 Pro by 44.2% in our overall performance rating.

Benchmarks

Launch prices and where to check today's

Motorola Edge 60 Pro

$350

Vivo X200 Ultra

$889

Launch price difference: $539. Motorola Edge 60 Pro was $539 cheaper at launch.

Detailed category analysis

performance

In the "performance" category, the Vivo X200 Ultra notably outperforms the Motorola Edge 60 Pro (92/100 vs 70/100).

display

In the "display" category, the Vivo X200 Ultra is a bit better (89/100 vs 83/100).

camera

In the "camera" category, the Vivo X200 Ultra notably outperforms the Motorola Edge 60 Pro (93/100 vs 64/100).

battery

In the "battery" category, the Vivo X200 Ultra is a bit better (78/100 vs 73/100).

portability

In the "portability" category, the Motorola Edge 60 Pro significantly outperforms the Vivo X200 Ultra (65/100 vs 34/100).

Frequently asked questions

Which is better: the Motorola Edge 60 Pro or the Vivo X200 Ultra?

The Vivo X200 Ultra is noticeably better than the Motorola Edge 60 Pro — the overall rating gap is 16 points.

What is the rating of the Motorola Edge 60 Pro and the Vivo X200 Ultra?

The Motorola Edge 60 Pro has a MobileRank rating of 70/100, the Vivo X200 Ultra — 86/100.

Which has the better camera: the Motorola Edge 60 Pro or the Vivo X200 Ultra?

The Vivo X200 Ultra leads on camera score (93/100 vs 64/100).

Which is more powerful: the Motorola Edge 60 Pro or the Vivo X200 Ultra?

The Vivo X200 Ultra leads on performance (92/100 vs 70/100).

Should you choose the Motorola Edge 60 Pro over the Vivo X200 Ultra?

The Motorola Edge 60 Pro is a better fit for active users. The Vivo X200 Ultra is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.