Motorola Edge 60 Pro vs Vivo iQOO 16

The Motorola Edge 60 Pro (2025) runs on the MediaTek Dimensity 8350 Extreme, while the Vivo iQOO 16 (2026) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Extreme Gen 6; launch prices were $350 and $840. By overall MobileRank rating, the Vivo iQOO 16 leads — 89/100 vs 69/100 (a 20-point difference). Key differences: the Vivo iQOO 16 has the bigger battery (8400 mAh vs 6000); the Vivo iQOO 16 is faster in AnTuTu (5,498,720 vs 1,537,550); the Motorola Edge 60 Pro is noticeably lighter (186g vs 223g).

The Vivo iQOO 16 significantly outperforms the Motorola Edge 60 Pro by 20 points (89/100 vs 69/100).

Profile comparison

Category scores

Motorola Edge 60 Pro

Performance 68
Display 83
Camera 64
Battery 73
Portability 65
Value for money 72

Vivo iQOO 16

Performance 100
Display 99
Camera 78
Battery 90
Portability 42
Value for money 92

What makes Motorola Edge 60 Pro better?

  • Lighter: 186g vs 223g
  • Cheaper at launch: $350 vs $840

  • Better portability (65/100 vs 42/100)

What makes Vivo iQOO 16 better?

  • Higher AnTuTu: 5498720 vs 1537550
  • Better Geekbench Single: 4327 vs 1398
  • Better Geekbench Multi: 12873 vs 4313
  • Bigger battery: 8400 vs 6000 mAh
  • Faster charging: 100W vs 90W
  • Higher refresh rate: 165Hz vs 120Hz
  • Faster wireless charging: 40W vs 15W

  • Higher performance (100/100 vs 68/100)
  • Better camera (78/100 vs 64/100)
  • Longer battery life (90/100 vs 73/100)
  • Better display (99/100 vs 83/100)

Comparison verdict

Comparing the Motorola Edge 60 Pro vs the Vivo iQOO 16, the Vivo iQOO 16 scores 20 points higher (89/100 vs 69/100). In the "performance" category, the Vivo iQOO 16 leads (100/100 vs 68/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo iQOO 16 leads (78/100 vs 64/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo iQOO 16 leads (90/100 vs 73/100). Value score: Motorola Edge 60 Pro — 72/100, Vivo iQOO 16 — 92/100; it shows how far a model sits above or below the usual level for its price, and is not part of the overall rating. In the "performance" category, the Vivo iQOO 16 significantly outperforms the Motorola Edge 60 Pro (100/100 vs 68/100). In the "display" category, the Vivo iQOO 16 notably outperforms the Motorola Edge 60 Pro (99/100 vs 83/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo iQOO 16 is a bit better (78/100 vs 64/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo iQOO 16 notably outperforms the Motorola Edge 60 Pro (90/100 vs 73/100). In the "portability" category, the Motorola Edge 60 Pro notably outperforms the Vivo iQOO 16 (65/100 vs 42/100).

Motorola Edge 60 Pro: The Motorola Edge 60 Pro is a better fit for active users.
Vivo iQOO 16: The Vivo iQOO 16 is a better fit for gamers and power users, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.

Specs comparison

Specification Motorola Edge 60 Pro Vivo iQOO 16
Processor MediaTek Dimensity 8350 Extreme Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Extreme Gen 6
AnTuTu 1537550 5498720
Geekbench Single 1398 4327
Geekbench Multi 4313 12873
Display 6.7" pOLED 6.8" AMOLED
Resolution 2712x1220 1440x3168
Refresh rate 120 Hz 165 Hz
Battery 6000 mAh 8400 mAh
Charging 90W 100W
Wireless charging 15W 40W
Main camera 50 MP 50 MP
Ultrawide 50 MP 50 MP
Telephoto 10 MP 50 MP
Front camera 50 MP 32 MP
RAM 8GB / 12GB 12GB / 16GB
Storage 256GB / 512GB 256GB / 512GB / 1TB
OS Android 15 Android 17
Brightness (peak) 4500 nits 6000 nits
NFC yes yes
Protection IP68/IP69 IP68/IP69
Dimensions 160.7×73.1×8.2 mm 163.8×76.9×8.3 mm
Weight 186 g 223 g
Launch price $350 $840

Camera comparison

Motorola Edge 60 Pro

  • Main: 50MP f/1.8
  • Ultrawide: 50MP
  • Telephoto: 10MP
  • Front: 50MP
64
camera

Vivo iQOO 16

  • Main: 50MP f/1.7
  • Ultrawide: 50MP
  • Telephoto: 50MP
  • Front: 32MP
78
camera

Display comparison

Motorola Edge 60 Pro

  • 6.7" pOLED
  • Resolution: 2712x1220
  • Refresh rate: 120 Hz
83
display

Vivo iQOO 16

  • 6.8" AMOLED
  • Resolution: 1440x3168
  • Refresh rate: 165 Hz
99
display

Battery and charging

Motorola Edge 60 Pro

  • 6000 mAh
  • NanoReview test: web browsing 12:38 hrs, total 24:17 hrs
  • Wired: 90W
  • Wireless: 15W
73
battery

Vivo iQOO 16

  • 8400 mAh
  • Wired: 100W
  • Wireless: 40W
90
battery

Overall performance score

We compared Motorola Edge 60 Pro and Vivo iQOO 16, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.

Motorola Edge 60 Pro MediaTek Dimensity 8350 Extreme
69/100
1537550 AnTuTu
Vivo iQOO 16 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Extreme Gen 6
89/100 +72.0%
5498720 AnTuTu

Vivo iQOO 16 leads Motorola Edge 60 Pro by 72.0% in our overall performance rating.

Benchmarks

Launch prices and where to check today's

Motorola Edge 60 Pro

$350

Vivo iQOO 16

$840

Launch price difference: $490. Motorola Edge 60 Pro was $490 cheaper at launch.

Detailed category analysis

performance

In the "performance" category, the Vivo iQOO 16 significantly outperforms the Motorola Edge 60 Pro (100/100 vs 68/100).

display

In the "display" category, the Vivo iQOO 16 notably outperforms the Motorola Edge 60 Pro (99/100 vs 83/100).

camera

In the "camera" category, the Vivo iQOO 16 is a bit better (78/100 vs 64/100).

battery

In the "battery" category, the Vivo iQOO 16 notably outperforms the Motorola Edge 60 Pro (90/100 vs 73/100).

portability

In the "portability" category, the Motorola Edge 60 Pro notably outperforms the Vivo iQOO 16 (65/100 vs 42/100).

Frequently asked questions

Which is better: the Motorola Edge 60 Pro or the Vivo iQOO 16?

The Vivo iQOO 16 significantly outperforms the Motorola Edge 60 Pro by 20 points (89/100 vs 69/100).

What is the rating of the Motorola Edge 60 Pro and the Vivo iQOO 16?

The Motorola Edge 60 Pro has a MobileRank rating of 69/100, the Vivo iQOO 16 — 89/100.

Which has the better camera: the Motorola Edge 60 Pro or the Vivo iQOO 16?

The Vivo iQOO 16 leads on camera score (78/100 vs 64/100).

Which is more powerful: the Motorola Edge 60 Pro or the Vivo iQOO 16?

The Vivo iQOO 16 leads on performance (100/100 vs 68/100).

Should you choose the Motorola Edge 60 Pro over the Vivo iQOO 16?

The Motorola Edge 60 Pro is a better fit for active users. The Vivo iQOO 16 is a better fit for gamers and power users, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.