Motorola Edge 50 Fusion vs Vivo X300 Ultra

The Motorola Edge 50 Fusion (2024) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 2, while the Vivo X300 Ultra (2026) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5. By overall MobileRank rating, the Vivo X300 Ultra leads — 91/100 vs 55/100 (a 36-point difference). Key differences: the Vivo X300 Ultra has the bigger battery (7000 mAh vs 5000); the main camera is 50 MP vs 200 MP; the Vivo X300 Ultra is faster in AnTuTu (4,247,433 vs 794,638); the Motorola Edge 50 Fusion is noticeably lighter (174g vs 230g).

The Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Motorola Edge 50 Fusion by 36 points (91/100 vs 55/100).
Profile comparison
Category scores
Motorola Edge 50 Fusion
Performance 53
Display 79
Camera 42
Battery 53
Portability 75
Value for money
Vivo X300 Ultra
Performance 99
Display 89
Camera 96
Battery 85
Portability 39
Value for money 94
What makes Motorola Edge 50 Fusion better?
  • Lighter: 174g vs 230g

  • Better portability (75/100 vs 39/100)
What makes Vivo X300 Ultra better?
  • Higher AnTuTu: 4247433 vs 794638
  • Better Geekbench Single: 3640 vs 1015
  • Better Geekbench Multi: 11033 vs 2687
  • Bigger battery: 7000 vs 5000 mAh
  • Faster charging: 100W vs 68W
  • Better main camera: 200MP vs 50MP

  • Higher performance (99/100 vs 53/100)
  • Better camera (96/100 vs 42/100)
  • Longer battery life (85/100 vs 53/100)
  • Better display (89/100 vs 79/100)
Comparison verdict

Comparing the Motorola Edge 50 Fusion vs the Vivo X300 Ultra, the Vivo X300 Ultra scores 36 points higher (91/100 vs 55/100). In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra leads (99/100 vs 53/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra leads (96/100 vs 42/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra leads (85/100 vs 53/100). In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Motorola Edge 50 Fusion (99/100 vs 53/100). In the "display" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra is a bit better (89/100 vs 79/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Motorola Edge 50 Fusion (96/100 vs 42/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Motorola Edge 50 Fusion (85/100 vs 53/100). In the "portability" category, the Motorola Edge 50 Fusion significantly outperforms the Vivo X300 Ultra (75/100 vs 39/100).

Motorola Edge 50 Fusion: The Motorola Edge 50 Fusion is a better fit for everyday use.
Vivo X300 Ultra: The Vivo X300 Ultra is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.
Specs comparison
Specification Motorola Edge 50 Fusion Vivo X300 Ultra
Processor Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 2 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5
AnTuTu 794638 4247433
Geekbench Single 1015 3640
Geekbench Multi 2687 11033
Display 6.7" P-OLED 6.8" LTPO OLED
Resolution 1080x2400 3168x1440
Refresh rate 120 Hz 120 Hz
Battery 5000 mAh 7000 mAh
Charging 68W 100W
Wireless charging 0W 40W
DXOMark (camera) 170
Main camera 50 MP 200 MP
Ultrawide 13 MP 50 MP
Telephoto 0 MP 200 MP
Front camera 32 MP 32 MP
RAM 8GB / 12GB 12GB / 16GB
Storage 128GB / 256GB / 512GB 256GB / 512GB / 1TB
OS Android 14, up to 3 major Android upgrades Android 16
Brightness (peak) 1600 nits
NFC yes yes
Protection IP68 IP69
Dimensions 161.9×73.1×7.9 mm 163.0×76.8×8.2 mm
Weight 174 g 230 g
Launch price $950
Camera comparison
Motorola Edge 50 Fusion
  • Main: 50MP f/f/1.9
  • Ultrawide: 13MP
  • Front: 32MP
42
camera
Vivo X300 Ultra
  • Main: 200MP f/f/1.6
  • Ultrawide: 50MP
  • Telephoto: 200MP
  • Front: 32MP
96
camera
Display comparison
Motorola Edge 50 Fusion
  • 6.7" P-OLED
  • Resolution: 1080x2400
  • Refresh rate: 120 Hz
79
display
Vivo X300 Ultra
  • 6.8" LTPO OLED
  • Resolution: 3168x1440
  • Refresh rate: 120 Hz
89
display
Battery and charging
Motorola Edge 50 Fusion
  • 5000 mAh
  • Wired: 68W
  • No wireless charging
53
battery
Vivo X300 Ultra
  • 7000 mAh
  • NanoReview test: web browsing 10:18 hrs, total 29:11 hrs
  • Wired: 100W
  • Wireless: 40W
85
battery
Overall performance score

We compared Motorola Edge 50 Fusion and Vivo X300 Ultra, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.

Motorola Edge 50 Fusion Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 2
55/100
794638 AnTuTu
Vivo X300 Ultra Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5
91/100 +81.3%
4247433 AnTuTu

Vivo X300 Ultra leads Motorola Edge 50 Fusion by 81.3% in our overall performance rating.

Benchmarks
Launch prices and where to check today's
Motorola Edge 50 Fusion
Price unknown
Vivo X300 Ultra
$950
Detailed category analysis
performance

In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Motorola Edge 50 Fusion (99/100 vs 53/100).

display

In the "display" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra is a bit better (89/100 vs 79/100).

camera

In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Motorola Edge 50 Fusion (96/100 vs 42/100).

battery

In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Motorola Edge 50 Fusion (85/100 vs 53/100).

portability

In the "portability" category, the Motorola Edge 50 Fusion significantly outperforms the Vivo X300 Ultra (75/100 vs 39/100).

Frequently asked questions
Which is better: the Motorola Edge 50 Fusion or the Vivo X300 Ultra?

The Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Motorola Edge 50 Fusion by 36 points (91/100 vs 55/100).

What is the rating of the Motorola Edge 50 Fusion and the Vivo X300 Ultra?

The Motorola Edge 50 Fusion has a MobileRank rating of 55/100, the Vivo X300 Ultra — 91/100.

Which has the better camera: the Motorola Edge 50 Fusion or the Vivo X300 Ultra?

The Vivo X300 Ultra leads on camera score (96/100 vs 42/100).

Which is more powerful: the Motorola Edge 50 Fusion or the Vivo X300 Ultra?

The Vivo X300 Ultra leads on performance (99/100 vs 53/100).

Should you choose the Motorola Edge 50 Fusion over the Vivo X300 Ultra?

The Motorola Edge 50 Fusion is a better fit for everyday use. The Vivo X300 Ultra is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.