Motorola Defy 2 vs Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold
The Motorola Defy 2 (2023) runs on the MediaTek Dimensity 930, while the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold (2025) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite. By overall MobileRank rating, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold leads — 69/100 vs 45/100 (a 24-point difference). Key differences: the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold has the bigger battery (5600 mAh vs 5000); the main camera is 50 MP vs 200 MP; the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold is faster in AnTuTu (2,926,532 vs 593,307); the Motorola Defy 2 is noticeably lighter (268g vs 309g).
Profile comparison
Category scores
Motorola Defy 2
Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold
What makes Motorola Defy 2 better?
- Lighter: 268g vs 309g
- Overall rating 45/100
What makes Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold better?
- Higher AnTuTu: 2926532 vs 593307
- Better Geekbench Single: 3013 vs 915
- Better Geekbench Multi: 9287 vs 2299
- Bigger battery: 5600 vs 5000 mAh
- Faster charging: 45W vs 15W
- Better main camera: 200MP vs 50MP
- Higher performance (90/100 vs 47/100)
- Better camera (52/100 vs 33/100)
- Longer battery life (63/100 vs 51/100)
- Better display (70/100 vs 66/100)
Comparison verdict
Comparing the Motorola Defy 2 vs the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold scores 24 points higher (69/100 vs 45/100). In the "performance" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold leads (90/100 vs 47/100). In the "camera" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold leads (52/100 vs 33/100). In the "battery" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold leads (63/100 vs 51/100). In the "performance" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold significantly outperforms the Motorola Defy 2 (90/100 vs 47/100). In the "display" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold and the Motorola Defy 2 are nearly equal (70/100 vs 66/100). In the "camera" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold notably outperforms the Motorola Defy 2 (52/100 vs 33/100). In the "battery" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold is a bit better (63/100 vs 51/100). In the "portability" category, both devices are on the same level — 20/100.
Specs comparison
| Specification | Motorola Defy 2 | Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | MediaTek Dimensity 930 | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite | |
| AnTuTu | 593307 | 2926532 | |
| Geekbench Single | 915 | 3013 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 2299 | 9287 | |
| Display | 6.6" IPS LCD | 10.0" Dynamic AMOLED 2X | |
| Resolution | 1080x2408 | 2160x1584 | |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz | |
| Battery | 5000 mAh | 5600 mAh | |
| Charging | 15W | 45W | |
| Wireless charging | 15W | 15W | |
| Main camera | 50 MP | 200 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 8 MP | 12 MP | |
| Telephoto | 0 MP | 10 MP | |
| Front camera | 8 MP | 10 MP | |
| RAM | 6GB | 16GB | |
| Storage | 128GB | 512GB | |
| OS | Android 12 | Android 16 / One UI 8 | |
| Brightness (peak) | — | 2600 nits | |
| NFC | yes | yes | |
| Protection | IP68 | IP48 | |
| Dimensions | 171.0×80.0×11.9 mm | 159.2×75.0×12.9 mm | |
| Weight | 268 g | 309 g | |
| Launch price | — | $2899 |
Camera comparison
Motorola Defy 2
- Main: 50MP f/1.8
- Ultrawide: 8MP
- Front: 8MP
Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold
- Main: 200MP f/1.7
- Ultrawide: 12MP
- Telephoto: 10MP
- Front: 10MP
Display comparison
Motorola Defy 2
- 6.6" IPS LCD
- Resolution: 1080x2408
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold
- 10.0" Dynamic AMOLED 2X
- Resolution: 2160x1584
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Battery and charging
Motorola Defy 2
- 5000 mAh
- Wired: 15W
- Wireless: 15W
Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold
- 5600 mAh
- Wired: 45W
- Wireless: 15W
Overall performance score
We compared Motorola Defy 2 and Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold leads Motorola Defy 2 by 79.7% in our overall performance rating.
Benchmarks
Launch prices and where to check today's
Motorola Defy 2
Price unknownDetailed category analysis
performance
In the "performance" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold significantly outperforms the Motorola Defy 2 (90/100 vs 47/100).
display
In the "display" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold and the Motorola Defy 2 are nearly equal (70/100 vs 66/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold notably outperforms the Motorola Defy 2 (52/100 vs 33/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold is a bit better (63/100 vs 51/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, both devices are on the same level — 20/100.
Frequently asked questions
Which is better: the Motorola Defy 2 or the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold?
The Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold significantly outperforms the Motorola Defy 2 by 24 points (69/100 vs 45/100).
What is the rating of the Motorola Defy 2 and the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold?
The Motorola Defy 2 has a MobileRank rating of 45/100, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold — 69/100.
Which has the better camera: the Motorola Defy 2 or the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold?
The Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold leads on camera score (52/100 vs 33/100).
Which is more powerful: the Motorola Defy 2 or the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold?
The Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold leads on performance (90/100 vs 47/100).
Should you choose the Motorola Defy 2 over the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold?
The Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold is a better fit for gamers and power users.