Infinix Hot 12 Play NFC vs Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold
The Infinix Hot 12 Play NFC (2022) runs on the Unisoc T610, while the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold (2025) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite. By overall MobileRank rating, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold leads — 57/100 vs 17/100 (a 40-point difference). Key differences: the Infinix Hot 12 Play NFC has the bigger battery (6000 mAh vs 5600); the main camera is 13 MP vs 200 MP; the Infinix Hot 12 Play NFC is noticeably lighter (209g vs 309g).
Infinix Hot 12 Play NFC
Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold
- Bigger battery: 6000 vs 5600 mAh
- Lighter: 209g vs 309g
- Better design/ergonomics (38/100 vs 0/100)
- Better value for money (55/100 vs 0/100)
- Better main camera: 200MP vs 13MP
- Higher refresh rate: 120Hz vs 90Hz
- Higher performance (67/100 vs 0/100)
- Better camera (49/100 vs 0/100)
- Longer battery life (52/100 vs 45/100)
- Better display (100/100 vs 50/100)
Comparing the Infinix Hot 12 Play NFC vs the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold scores 40 points higher (57/100 vs 17/100). In the "performance" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold leads (67/100 vs 0/100). In the "camera" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold leads (49/100 vs 0/100). In the "value for money" category, the Infinix Hot 12 Play NFC leads (55/100 vs 0/100). In the "performance" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold significantly outperforms the Infinix Hot 12 Play NFC (67/100 vs 0/100). In the "display" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold significantly outperforms the Infinix Hot 12 Play NFC (100/100 vs 50/100). In the "camera" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold significantly outperforms the Infinix Hot 12 Play NFC (49/100 vs 0/100). In the "battery" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold is a bit better (52/100 vs 45/100). In the "design" category, the Infinix Hot 12 Play NFC significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold (38/100 vs 0/100). In the "value for money" category, the Infinix Hot 12 Play NFC significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold (55/100 vs 0/100).
| Specification | Infinix Hot 12 Play NFC | Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | Unisoc T610 | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite | |
| AnTuTu | — | 2926532 | |
| Geekbench Single | — | 3050 | |
| Geekbench Multi | — | 9300 | |
| Display | 6.8" IPS LCD | 10.0" Dynamic AMOLED 2X | |
| Resolution | 720x1640 | 2160x1584 | |
| Refresh rate | 90 Hz | 120 Hz | |
| Battery | 6000 mAh | 5600 mAh | |
| Charging | — | 45W | |
| Wireless charging | 0W | 15W | |
| Main camera | 13 MP | 200 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 0 MP | 12 MP | |
| Telephoto | 0 MP | 10 MP | |
| Front camera | 8 MP | 10 MP | |
| RAM | 4GB / 6GB | 16GB | |
| Storage | 64GB / 128GB | 512GB | |
| OS | Android 11, XOS 10 | Android 16 / One UI 8 | |
| Brightness (peak) | — | 2600 nits | |
| NFC | yes | yes | |
| Protection | — | IP48 | |
| Dimensions | 171.0×78.0×8.9 mm | 159.2×75.0×12.9 mm | |
| Weight | 209 g | 309 g | |
| Price | — | $2899 |
Infinix Hot 12 Play NFC
- Main: 13MP f/f/1.8
- Front: 8MP
Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold
- Main: 200MP f/f/1.7
- Ultrawide: 12MP
- Telephoto: 10MP
- Front: 10MP
Infinix Hot 12 Play NFC
- 6.8" IPS LCD
- Resolution: 720x1640
- Refresh rate: 90 Hz
Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold
- 10.0" Dynamic AMOLED 2X
- Resolution: 2160x1584
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Infinix Hot 12 Play NFC
- 6000 mAh
- No wireless charging
Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold
- 5600 mAh
- Wired: 45W
- Wireless: 15W
Infinix Hot 12 Play NFC
Price unknownperformance
In the "performance" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold significantly outperforms the Infinix Hot 12 Play NFC (67/100 vs 0/100).
display
In the "display" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold significantly outperforms the Infinix Hot 12 Play NFC (100/100 vs 50/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold significantly outperforms the Infinix Hot 12 Play NFC (49/100 vs 0/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold is a bit better (52/100 vs 45/100).
design
In the "design" category, the Infinix Hot 12 Play NFC significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold (38/100 vs 0/100).
value for money
In the "value for money" category, the Infinix Hot 12 Play NFC significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold (55/100 vs 0/100).
Which is better: the Infinix Hot 12 Play NFC or the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold?
The Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold significantly outperforms the Infinix Hot 12 Play NFC by 40 points (57/100 vs 17/100).
What is the rating of the Infinix Hot 12 Play NFC and the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold?
The Infinix Hot 12 Play NFC has a MobileRank rating of 17/100, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold — 57/100.
Which has the better camera: the Infinix Hot 12 Play NFC or the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold?
The Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold leads on camera score (49/100 vs 0/100).
Which is more powerful: the Infinix Hot 12 Play NFC or the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold?
The Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold leads on performance (67/100 vs 0/100).
Should you choose the Infinix Hot 12 Play NFC over the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold?
The Infinix Hot 12 Play NFC is a better fit for everyday use. The Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold is a better fit for active users.