Infinix Zero Ultra vs Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold
The Infinix Zero Ultra (2022) runs on the MediaTek Dimensity 920, while the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold (2025) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite. By overall MobileRank rating, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold leads — 69/100 vs 56/100 (a 13-point difference). Key differences: the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold has the bigger battery (5600 mAh vs 4500); the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold is faster in AnTuTu (2,926,532 vs 750,481); the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold has NFC for contactless payments, the Infinix Zero Ultra doesn't; the Infinix Zero Ultra is noticeably lighter (213g vs 309g).
Profile comparison
Category scores
Infinix Zero Ultra
Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold
What makes Infinix Zero Ultra better?
- Faster charging: 180W vs 45W
- Lighter: 213g vs 309g
- Better camera (55/100 vs 52/100)
- Better display (79/100 vs 70/100)
- Better portability (42/100 vs 20/100)
What makes Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold better?
- Higher AnTuTu: 2926532 vs 750481
- Better Geekbench Single: 3013 vs 936
- Better Geekbench Multi: 9287 vs 2318
- Bigger battery: 5600 vs 4500 mAh
- Higher performance (90/100 vs 51/100)
- Longer battery life (63/100 vs 54/100)
Comparison verdict
Comparing the Infinix Zero Ultra vs the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold scores 13 points higher (69/100 vs 56/100). In the "performance" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold leads (90/100 vs 51/100). In the "performance" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold significantly outperforms the Infinix Zero Ultra (90/100 vs 51/100). In the "display" category, the Infinix Zero Ultra is a bit better (79/100 vs 70/100). In the "camera" category, the Infinix Zero Ultra and the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold are nearly equal (55/100 vs 52/100). In the "battery" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold is a bit better (63/100 vs 54/100). In the "portability" category, the Infinix Zero Ultra notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold (42/100 vs 20/100).
Specs comparison
| Specification | Infinix Zero Ultra | Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | MediaTek Dimensity 920 | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite | |
| AnTuTu | 750481 | 2926532 | |
| Geekbench Single | 936 | 3013 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 2318 | 9287 | |
| Display | 6.8" AMOLED | 10.0" Dynamic AMOLED 2X | |
| Resolution | 1080x2400 | 2160x1584 | |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz | |
| Battery | 4500 mAh | 5600 mAh | |
| Charging | 180W | 45W | |
| Wireless charging | 0W | 15W | |
| Main camera | 200 MP | 200 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 13 MP | 12 MP | |
| Telephoto | 0 MP | 10 MP | |
| Front camera | 32 MP | 10 MP | |
| RAM | 8GB | 16GB | |
| Storage | 256GB | 512GB | |
| OS | Android 12, XOS 12 | Android 16 / One UI 8 | |
| Brightness (peak) | — | 2600 nits | |
| NFC | no | yes | |
| Protection | — | IP48 | |
| Dimensions | 165.5×74.5×8.8 mm | 159.2×75.0×12.9 mm | |
| Weight | 213 g | 309 g | |
| Launch price | — | $2899 |
Camera comparison
Infinix Zero Ultra
- Main: 200MP f/2.0
- Ultrawide: 13MP
- Front: 32MP
Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold
- Main: 200MP f/1.7
- Ultrawide: 12MP
- Telephoto: 10MP
- Front: 10MP
Display comparison
Infinix Zero Ultra
- 6.8" AMOLED
- Resolution: 1080x2400
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold
- 10.0" Dynamic AMOLED 2X
- Resolution: 2160x1584
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Battery and charging
Infinix Zero Ultra
- 4500 mAh
- Wired: 180W
- No wireless charging
Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold
- 5600 mAh
- Wired: 45W
- Wireless: 15W
Overall performance score
We compared Infinix Zero Ultra and Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold leads Infinix Zero Ultra by 74.4% in our overall performance rating.
Benchmarks
Launch prices and where to check today's
Infinix Zero Ultra
Price unknownDetailed category analysis
performance
In the "performance" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold significantly outperforms the Infinix Zero Ultra (90/100 vs 51/100).
display
In the "display" category, the Infinix Zero Ultra is a bit better (79/100 vs 70/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the Infinix Zero Ultra and the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold are nearly equal (55/100 vs 52/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold is a bit better (63/100 vs 54/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, the Infinix Zero Ultra notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold (42/100 vs 20/100).
Frequently asked questions
Which is better: the Infinix Zero Ultra or the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold?
The Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold is noticeably better than the Infinix Zero Ultra — the overall rating gap is 13 points.
What is the rating of the Infinix Zero Ultra and the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold?
The Infinix Zero Ultra has a MobileRank rating of 56/100, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold — 69/100.
Which is more powerful: the Infinix Zero Ultra or the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold?
The Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold leads on performance (90/100 vs 51/100).
Should you choose the Infinix Zero Ultra over the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold?
The Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold is a better fit for gamers and power users.