Infinix GT 50 Pro vs Vivo X300 Pro

The Infinix GT 50 Pro (2026) runs on the MediaTek Dimensity 8400 Ultimate, while the Vivo X300 Pro (2025) runs on the Dimensity 9500; launch prices were $349 and $899. By overall MobileRank rating, the Vivo X300 Pro leads — 88/100 vs 65/100 (a 23-point difference). Key differences: the Vivo X300 Pro has the bigger battery (6510 mAh vs 6500); the main camera is 50 MP vs 200 MP; the Vivo X300 Pro is faster in AnTuTu (3,326,259 vs 1,959,760); the Infinix GT 50 Pro is noticeably lighter (200g vs 226g).

The Vivo X300 Pro significantly outperforms the Infinix GT 50 Pro by 23 points (88/100 vs 65/100).

Profile comparison

Category scores

Infinix GT 50 Pro

Performance 76
Display 92
Camera 34
Battery 69
Portability 60
Value for money 64

Vivo X300 Pro

Performance 94
Display 84
Camera 96
Battery 81
Portability 43
Value for money 88

What makes Infinix GT 50 Pro better?

  • Higher refresh rate: 144Hz vs 120Hz
  • Lighter: 200g vs 226g
  • Cheaper at launch: $349 vs $899

  • Better display (92/100 vs 84/100)
  • Better portability (60/100 vs 43/100)

What makes Vivo X300 Pro better?

  • Higher AnTuTu: 3326259 vs 1959760
  • Better Geekbench Single: 3293 vs 1579
  • Better Geekbench Multi: 10243 vs 6100
  • Bigger battery: 6510 vs 6500 mAh
  • Faster charging: 90W vs 45W
  • Better main camera: 200MP vs 50MP
  • Faster wireless charging: 40W vs 30W

  • Higher performance (94/100 vs 76/100)
  • Better camera (96/100 vs 34/100)
  • Longer battery life (81/100 vs 69/100)

Comparison verdict

Comparing the Infinix GT 50 Pro vs the Vivo X300 Pro, the Vivo X300 Pro scores 23 points higher (88/100 vs 65/100). In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 Pro leads (94/100 vs 76/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Pro leads (96/100 vs 34/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Pro leads (81/100 vs 69/100). Value score: Infinix GT 50 Pro — 64/100, Vivo X300 Pro — 88/100; it shows how far a model sits above or below the usual level for its price, and is not part of the overall rating. In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 Pro notably outperforms the Infinix GT 50 Pro (94/100 vs 76/100). In the "display" category, the Infinix GT 50 Pro is a bit better (92/100 vs 84/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Pro significantly outperforms the Infinix GT 50 Pro (96/100 vs 34/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Pro is a bit better (81/100 vs 69/100). In the "portability" category, the Infinix GT 50 Pro notably outperforms the Vivo X300 Pro (60/100 vs 43/100).

Infinix GT 50 Pro: The Infinix GT 50 Pro is a better fit for active users.
Vivo X300 Pro: The Vivo X300 Pro is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.

Specs comparison

Specification Infinix GT 50 Pro Vivo X300 Pro
Processor MediaTek Dimensity 8400 Ultimate Dimensity 9500
AnTuTu 1959760 3326259
Geekbench Single 1579 3293
Geekbench Multi 6100 10243
Display 6.8" AMOLED 6.8" AMOLED
Resolution 1208x2644 1260x2800
Refresh rate 144 Hz 120 Hz
Battery 6500 mAh 6510 mAh
Charging 45W 90W
Wireless charging 30W 40W
DXOMark (camera) — 171
Main camera 50 MP 200 MP
Ultrawide 8 MP 50 MP
Telephoto 0 MP 50 MP
Front camera 13 MP 32 MP
RAM 12GB 12GB / 16GB
Storage 256GB / 512GB 256GB / 512GB / 1TB
OS Android 15 Android 16
Brightness (peak) 4500 nits 4500 nits
NFC yes yes
Protection IP64 IP68
Dimensions — 161.2×75.5×8.0 mm
Weight 200 g 226 g
Launch price $349 $899

Camera comparison

Infinix GT 50 Pro

  • Main: 50MP f/1.8
  • Ultrawide: 8MP
  • Front: 13MP
34
camera

Vivo X300 Pro

  • Main: 200MP f/1.57
  • Ultrawide: 50MP
  • Telephoto: 50MP
  • Front: 32MP
96
camera

Display comparison

Infinix GT 50 Pro

  • 6.8" AMOLED
  • Resolution: 1208x2644
  • Refresh rate: 144 Hz
92
display

Vivo X300 Pro

  • 6.8" AMOLED
  • Resolution: 1260x2800
  • Refresh rate: 120 Hz
84
display

Battery and charging

Infinix GT 50 Pro

  • 6500 mAh
  • Wired: 45W
  • Wireless: 30W
69
battery

Vivo X300 Pro

  • 6510 mAh
  • NanoReview test: web browsing 13:30 hrs, total 24:37 hrs
  • Wired: 90W
  • Wireless: 40W
81
battery

Overall performance score

We compared Infinix GT 50 Pro and Vivo X300 Pro, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.

Infinix GT 50 Pro MediaTek Dimensity 8400 Ultimate
65/100
1959760 AnTuTu
Vivo X300 Pro Dimensity 9500
88/100 +41.1%
3326259 AnTuTu

Vivo X300 Pro leads Infinix GT 50 Pro by 41.1% in our overall performance rating.

Benchmarks

Launch prices and where to check today's

Infinix GT 50 Pro

$349

Vivo X300 Pro

$899

Launch price difference: $550. Infinix GT 50 Pro was $550 cheaper at launch.

Detailed category analysis

performance

In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 Pro notably outperforms the Infinix GT 50 Pro (94/100 vs 76/100).

display

In the "display" category, the Infinix GT 50 Pro is a bit better (92/100 vs 84/100).

camera

In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Pro significantly outperforms the Infinix GT 50 Pro (96/100 vs 34/100).

battery

In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Pro is a bit better (81/100 vs 69/100).

portability

In the "portability" category, the Infinix GT 50 Pro notably outperforms the Vivo X300 Pro (60/100 vs 43/100).

Frequently asked questions

Which is better: the Infinix GT 50 Pro or the Vivo X300 Pro?

The Vivo X300 Pro significantly outperforms the Infinix GT 50 Pro by 23 points (88/100 vs 65/100).

What is the rating of the Infinix GT 50 Pro and the Vivo X300 Pro?

The Infinix GT 50 Pro has a MobileRank rating of 65/100, the Vivo X300 Pro — 88/100.

Which has the better camera: the Infinix GT 50 Pro or the Vivo X300 Pro?

The Vivo X300 Pro leads on camera score (96/100 vs 34/100).

Which is more powerful: the Infinix GT 50 Pro or the Vivo X300 Pro?

The Vivo X300 Pro leads on performance (94/100 vs 76/100).

Should you choose the Infinix GT 50 Pro over the Vivo X300 Pro?

The Infinix GT 50 Pro is a better fit for active users. The Vivo X300 Pro is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.