Infinix GT 50 Pro vs Vivo X300 Pro
The Infinix GT 50 Pro (2026) runs on the MediaTek Dimensity 8400 Ultimate, while the Vivo X300 Pro (2025) runs on the Dimensity 9500; estimated prices are $349 and $899. By overall MobileRank rating, the Vivo X300 Pro leads — 87/100 vs 65/100 (a 22-point difference). Key differences: the Vivo X300 Pro has the bigger battery (6510 mAh vs 6500); the main camera is 50 MP vs 200 MP; the Vivo X300 Pro is faster in AnTuTu (3,269,794 vs 2,137,843); the Infinix GT 50 Pro is noticeably lighter (200g vs 226g).
Infinix GT 50 Pro
Vivo X300 Pro
- Higher refresh rate: 144Hz vs 120Hz
- Lighter: 200g vs 226g
- Cheaper: $349 vs $899
- Better display (92/100 vs 84/100)
- Better portability (60/100 vs 43/100)
- Higher AnTuTu: 3269794 vs 2137843
- Better Geekbench Single: 3228 vs 1579
- Better Geekbench Multi: 9553 vs 6100
- Bigger battery: 6510 vs 6500 mAh
- Faster charging: 90W vs 45W
- Better main camera: 200MP vs 50MP
- Faster wireless charging: 40W vs 30W
- Higher performance (93/100 vs 77/100)
- Better camera (96/100 vs 31/100)
- Longer battery life (81/100 vs 69/100)
- Better value for money (86/100 vs 70/100)
Comparing the Infinix GT 50 Pro vs the Vivo X300 Pro, the Vivo X300 Pro scores 22 points higher (87/100 vs 65/100). In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 Pro leads (93/100 vs 77/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Pro leads (96/100 vs 31/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Pro leads (81/100 vs 69/100). In the "value for money" category, the Vivo X300 Pro leads (86/100 vs 70/100). In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 Pro notably outperforms the Infinix GT 50 Pro (93/100 vs 77/100). In the "display" category, the Infinix GT 50 Pro is a bit better (92/100 vs 84/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Pro significantly outperforms the Infinix GT 50 Pro (96/100 vs 31/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Pro is a bit better (81/100 vs 69/100). In the "portability" category, the Infinix GT 50 Pro notably outperforms the Vivo X300 Pro (60/100 vs 43/100). In the "value for money" category, the Vivo X300 Pro notably outperforms the Infinix GT 50 Pro (86/100 vs 70/100).
| Specification | Infinix GT 50 Pro | Vivo X300 Pro | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | MediaTek Dimensity 8400 Ultimate | Dimensity 9500 | |
| AnTuTu | 2137843 | 3269794 | |
| Geekbench Single | 1579 | 3228 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 6100 | 9553 | |
| Display | 6.8" AMOLED | 6.8" AMOLED | |
| Resolution | 1208x2644 | 1260x2800 | |
| Refresh rate | 144 Hz | 120 Hz | |
| Battery | 6500 mAh | 6510 mAh | |
| Charging | 45W | 90W | |
| Wireless charging | 30W | 40W | |
| DXOMark (camera) | — | 171 | |
| Main camera | 50 MP | 200 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 0 MP | 50 MP | |
| Telephoto | 0 MP | 50 MP | |
| Front camera | 13 MP | 32 MP | |
| RAM | 12GB | 12GB / 16GB | |
| Storage | 256GB / 512GB | 256GB / 512GB / 1TB | |
| OS | Android 15 | Android 16 | |
| Brightness (peak) | 4500 nits | 4500 nits | |
| NFC | yes | yes | |
| Protection | IP64 | IP68 | |
| Dimensions | — | 161.2×75.5×8.0 mm | |
| Weight | 200 g | 226 g | |
| Price | $349 | $899 |
Infinix GT 50 Pro
- Main: 50MP f/f/1.8
- Front: 13MP
Vivo X300 Pro
- Main: 200MP f/f/1.57
- Ultrawide: 50MP
- Telephoto: 50MP
- Front: 32MP
Infinix GT 50 Pro
- 6.8" AMOLED
- Resolution: 1208x2644
- Refresh rate: 144 Hz
Vivo X300 Pro
- 6.8" AMOLED
- Resolution: 1260x2800
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Infinix GT 50 Pro
- 6500 mAh
- Wired: 45W
- Wireless: 30W
Vivo X300 Pro
- 6510 mAh
- NanoReview test: web browsing 13:30 hrs, total 24:37 hrs
- Wired: 90W
- Wireless: 40W
We compared Infinix GT 50 Pro and Vivo X300 Pro, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Vivo X300 Pro leads Infinix GT 50 Pro by 34.6% in our overall performance rating.
Price difference: $550. Infinix GT 50 Pro is cheaper by $550.
performance
In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 Pro notably outperforms the Infinix GT 50 Pro (93/100 vs 77/100).
display
In the "display" category, the Infinix GT 50 Pro is a bit better (92/100 vs 84/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Pro significantly outperforms the Infinix GT 50 Pro (96/100 vs 31/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Pro is a bit better (81/100 vs 69/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, the Infinix GT 50 Pro notably outperforms the Vivo X300 Pro (60/100 vs 43/100).
value for money
In the "value for money" category, the Vivo X300 Pro notably outperforms the Infinix GT 50 Pro (86/100 vs 70/100).
Which is better: the Infinix GT 50 Pro or the Vivo X300 Pro?
The Vivo X300 Pro significantly outperforms the Infinix GT 50 Pro by 22 points (87/100 vs 65/100).
What is the rating of the Infinix GT 50 Pro and the Vivo X300 Pro?
The Infinix GT 50 Pro has a MobileRank rating of 65/100, the Vivo X300 Pro — 87/100.
Which has the better camera: the Infinix GT 50 Pro or the Vivo X300 Pro?
The Vivo X300 Pro leads on camera score (96/100 vs 31/100).
Which is more powerful: the Infinix GT 50 Pro or the Vivo X300 Pro?
The Vivo X300 Pro leads on performance (93/100 vs 77/100).
Should you choose the Infinix GT 50 Pro over the Vivo X300 Pro?
The Infinix GT 50 Pro is a better fit for active users. The Vivo X300 Pro is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.