Infinix GT 50 Pro vs Vivo X300 Ultra
The Infinix GT 50 Pro (2026) runs on the MediaTek Dimensity 8400 Ultimate, while the Vivo X300 Ultra (2026) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5; launch prices were $349 and $950. By overall MobileRank rating, the Vivo X300 Ultra leads — 91/100 vs 65/100 (a 26-point difference). Key differences: the Vivo X300 Ultra has the bigger battery (7000 mAh vs 6500); the main camera is 50 MP vs 200 MP; the Vivo X300 Ultra is faster in AnTuTu (4,247,433 vs 1,959,760); the Infinix GT 50 Pro is noticeably lighter (200g vs 230g).
Profile comparison
Category scores
Infinix GT 50 Pro
Vivo X300 Ultra
What makes Infinix GT 50 Pro better?
- Higher refresh rate: 144Hz vs 120Hz
- Lighter: 200g vs 230g
- Cheaper at launch: $349 vs $950
- Better display (92/100 vs 89/100)
- Better portability (60/100 vs 39/100)
What makes Vivo X300 Ultra better?
- Higher AnTuTu: 4247433 vs 1959760
- Better Geekbench Single: 3639 vs 1579
- Better Geekbench Multi: 11047 vs 6100
- Bigger battery: 7000 vs 6500 mAh
- Faster charging: 100W vs 45W
- Better main camera: 200MP vs 50MP
- Faster wireless charging: 40W vs 30W
- Higher performance (99/100 vs 76/100)
- Better camera (96/100 vs 34/100)
- Longer battery life (85/100 vs 69/100)
Comparison verdict
Comparing the Infinix GT 50 Pro vs the Vivo X300 Ultra, the Vivo X300 Ultra scores 26 points higher (91/100 vs 65/100). In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra leads (99/100 vs 76/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra leads (96/100 vs 34/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra leads (85/100 vs 69/100). Value score: Infinix GT 50 Pro — 64/100, Vivo X300 Ultra — 94/100; it shows how far a model sits above or below the usual level for its price, and is not part of the overall rating. In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra notably outperforms the Infinix GT 50 Pro (99/100 vs 76/100). In the "display" category, the Infinix GT 50 Pro and the Vivo X300 Ultra are nearly equal (92/100 vs 89/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Infinix GT 50 Pro (96/100 vs 34/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra notably outperforms the Infinix GT 50 Pro (85/100 vs 69/100). In the "portability" category, the Infinix GT 50 Pro notably outperforms the Vivo X300 Ultra (60/100 vs 39/100).
Specs comparison
| Specification | Infinix GT 50 Pro | Vivo X300 Ultra | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | MediaTek Dimensity 8400 Ultimate | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 | |
| AnTuTu | 1959760 | 4247433 | |
| Geekbench Single | 1579 | 3639 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 6100 | 11047 | |
| Display | 6.8" AMOLED | 6.8" LTPO OLED | |
| Resolution | 1208x2644 | 3168x1440 | |
| Refresh rate | 144 Hz | 120 Hz | |
| Battery | 6500 mAh | 7000 mAh | |
| Charging | 45W | 100W | |
| Wireless charging | 30W | 40W | |
| DXOMark (camera) | — | 170 | |
| Main camera | 50 MP | 200 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 8 MP | 50 MP | |
| Telephoto | 0 MP | 200 MP | |
| Front camera | 13 MP | 32 MP | |
| RAM | 12GB | 12GB / 16GB | |
| Storage | 256GB / 512GB | 256GB / 512GB / 1TB | |
| OS | Android 15 | Android 16 | |
| Brightness (peak) | 4500 nits | — | |
| NFC | yes | yes | |
| Protection | IP64 | IP69 | |
| Dimensions | — | 163.0×76.8×8.2 mm | |
| Weight | 200 g | 230 g | |
| Launch price | $349 | $950 |
Camera comparison
Infinix GT 50 Pro
- Main: 50MP f/1.8
- Ultrawide: 8MP
- Front: 13MP
Vivo X300 Ultra
- Main: 200MP f/1.6
- Ultrawide: 50MP
- Telephoto: 200MP
- Front: 32MP
Display comparison
Infinix GT 50 Pro
- 6.8" AMOLED
- Resolution: 1208x2644
- Refresh rate: 144 Hz
Vivo X300 Ultra
- 6.8" LTPO OLED
- Resolution: 3168x1440
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Battery and charging
Infinix GT 50 Pro
- 6500 mAh
- Wired: 45W
- Wireless: 30W
Vivo X300 Ultra
- 7000 mAh
- NanoReview test: web browsing 10:18 hrs, total 29:11 hrs
- Wired: 100W
- Wireless: 40W
Overall performance score
We compared Infinix GT 50 Pro and Vivo X300 Ultra, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Vivo X300 Ultra leads Infinix GT 50 Pro by 53.9% in our overall performance rating.
Benchmarks
Launch prices and where to check today's
Launch price difference: $601. Infinix GT 50 Pro was $601 cheaper at launch.
Detailed category analysis
performance
In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra notably outperforms the Infinix GT 50 Pro (99/100 vs 76/100).
display
In the "display" category, the Infinix GT 50 Pro and the Vivo X300 Ultra are nearly equal (92/100 vs 89/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Infinix GT 50 Pro (96/100 vs 34/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra notably outperforms the Infinix GT 50 Pro (85/100 vs 69/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, the Infinix GT 50 Pro notably outperforms the Vivo X300 Ultra (60/100 vs 39/100).
Frequently asked questions
Which is better: the Infinix GT 50 Pro or the Vivo X300 Ultra?
The Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Infinix GT 50 Pro by 26 points (91/100 vs 65/100).
What is the rating of the Infinix GT 50 Pro and the Vivo X300 Ultra?
The Infinix GT 50 Pro has a MobileRank rating of 65/100, the Vivo X300 Ultra — 91/100.
Which has the better camera: the Infinix GT 50 Pro or the Vivo X300 Ultra?
The Vivo X300 Ultra leads on camera score (96/100 vs 34/100).
Which is more powerful: the Infinix GT 50 Pro or the Vivo X300 Ultra?
The Vivo X300 Ultra leads on performance (99/100 vs 76/100).
Should you choose the Infinix GT 50 Pro over the Vivo X300 Ultra?
The Infinix GT 50 Pro is a better fit for active users. The Vivo X300 Ultra is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.