Infinix GT 50 Pro vs Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra

The Infinix GT 50 Pro (2026) runs on the MediaTek Dimensity 8400 Ultimate, while the Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra (2026) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5; launch prices were $349 and $799. By overall MobileRank rating, the Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra leads — 89/100 vs 65/100 (a 24-point difference). Key differences: the Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra has the bigger battery (7400 mAh vs 6500); the Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra is faster in AnTuTu (4,602,290 vs 1,959,760); the Infinix GT 50 Pro is noticeably lighter (200g vs 227g).

The Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra significantly outperforms the Infinix GT 50 Pro by 24 points (89/100 vs 65/100).

Profile comparison

Category scores

Infinix GT 50 Pro

Performance 76
Display 92
Camera 34
Battery 69
Portability 60
Value for money 64

Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra

Performance 99
Display 99
Camera 78
Battery 92
Portability 35
Value for money 92

What makes Infinix GT 50 Pro better?

  • Lighter: 200g vs 227g
  • Cheaper at launch: $349 vs $799

  • Better portability (60/100 vs 35/100)

What makes Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra better?

  • Higher AnTuTu: 4602290 vs 1959760
  • Better Geekbench Single: 3639 vs 1579
  • Better Geekbench Multi: 11047 vs 6100
  • Bigger battery: 7400 vs 6500 mAh
  • Faster charging: 120W vs 45W
  • Faster wireless charging: 50W vs 30W

  • Higher performance (99/100 vs 76/100)
  • Better camera (78/100 vs 34/100)
  • Longer battery life (92/100 vs 69/100)
  • Better display (99/100 vs 92/100)

Comparison verdict

Comparing the Infinix GT 50 Pro vs the Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra, the Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra scores 24 points higher (89/100 vs 65/100). In the "performance" category, the Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra leads (99/100 vs 76/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra leads (78/100 vs 34/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra leads (92/100 vs 69/100). Value score: Infinix GT 50 Pro — 64/100, Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra — 92/100; it shows how far a model sits above or below the usual level for its price, and is not part of the overall rating. In the "performance" category, the Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra notably outperforms the Infinix GT 50 Pro (99/100 vs 76/100). In the "display" category, the Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra is a bit better (99/100 vs 92/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra significantly outperforms the Infinix GT 50 Pro (78/100 vs 34/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra notably outperforms the Infinix GT 50 Pro (92/100 vs 69/100). In the "portability" category, the Infinix GT 50 Pro notably outperforms the Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra (60/100 vs 35/100).

Infinix GT 50 Pro: The Infinix GT 50 Pro is a better fit for active users.
Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra: The Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra is a better fit for gamers and power users, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.

Specs comparison

Specification Infinix GT 50 Pro Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra
Processor MediaTek Dimensity 8400 Ultimate Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5
AnTuTu 1959760 4602290
Geekbench Single 1579 3639
Geekbench Multi 6100 11047
Display 6.8" AMOLED 6.8" LTPO AMOLED
Resolution 1208x2644 1440x3168
Refresh rate 144 Hz 144 Hz
Battery 6500 mAh 7400 mAh
Charging 45W 120W
Wireless charging 30W 50W
Main camera 50 MP 50 MP
Ultrawide 8 MP 50 MP
Telephoto 0 MP 50 MP
Front camera 13 MP 32 MP
RAM 12GB 12GB / 16GB / 24GB
Storage 256GB / 512GB 256GB / 512GB / 1TB
OS Android 15 Android 16
Brightness (peak) 4500 nits 8000 nits
NFC yes yes
Protection IP64 IP68
Dimensions — 163.7×76.8×8.7 mm
Weight 200 g 227 g
Launch price $349 $799

Camera comparison

Infinix GT 50 Pro

  • Main: 50MP f/1.8
  • Ultrawide: 8MP
  • Front: 13MP
34
camera

Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra

  • Main: 50MP f/1.9
  • Ultrawide: 50MP
  • Telephoto: 50MP
  • Front: 32MP
78
camera

Display comparison

Infinix GT 50 Pro

  • 6.8" AMOLED
  • Resolution: 1208x2644
  • Refresh rate: 144 Hz
92
display

Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra

  • 6.8" LTPO AMOLED
  • Resolution: 1440x3168
  • Refresh rate: 144 Hz
99
display

Battery and charging

Infinix GT 50 Pro

  • 6500 mAh
  • Wired: 45W
  • Wireless: 30W
69
battery

Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra

  • 7400 mAh
  • Wired: 120W
  • Wireless: 50W
92
battery

Overall performance score

We compared Infinix GT 50 Pro and Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.

Infinix GT 50 Pro MediaTek Dimensity 8400 Ultimate
65/100
1959760 AnTuTu
Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5
89/100 +57.4%
4602290 AnTuTu

Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra leads Infinix GT 50 Pro by 57.4% in our overall performance rating.

Benchmarks

Launch prices and where to check today's

Infinix GT 50 Pro

$349

Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra

$799

Launch price difference: $450. Infinix GT 50 Pro was $450 cheaper at launch.

Detailed category analysis

performance

In the "performance" category, the Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra notably outperforms the Infinix GT 50 Pro (99/100 vs 76/100).

display

In the "display" category, the Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra is a bit better (99/100 vs 92/100).

camera

In the "camera" category, the Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra significantly outperforms the Infinix GT 50 Pro (78/100 vs 34/100).

battery

In the "battery" category, the Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra notably outperforms the Infinix GT 50 Pro (92/100 vs 69/100).

portability

In the "portability" category, the Infinix GT 50 Pro notably outperforms the Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra (60/100 vs 35/100).

Frequently asked questions

Which is better: the Infinix GT 50 Pro or the Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra?

The Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra significantly outperforms the Infinix GT 50 Pro by 24 points (89/100 vs 65/100).

What is the rating of the Infinix GT 50 Pro and the Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra?

The Infinix GT 50 Pro has a MobileRank rating of 65/100, the Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra — 89/100.

Which has the better camera: the Infinix GT 50 Pro or the Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra?

The Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra leads on camera score (78/100 vs 34/100).

Which is more powerful: the Infinix GT 50 Pro or the Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra?

The Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra leads on performance (99/100 vs 76/100).

Should you choose the Infinix GT 50 Pro over the Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra?

The Infinix GT 50 Pro is a better fit for active users. The Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra is a better fit for gamers and power users, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.