Infinix Note 50 Pro+ vs Vivo X300 Ultra
The Infinix Note 50 Pro+ (2025) runs on the MediaTek Dimensity 8350, while the Vivo X300 Ultra (2026) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5; launch prices were $280 and $950. By overall MobileRank rating, the Vivo X300 Ultra leads — 91/100 vs 71/100 (a 20-point difference). Key differences: the Vivo X300 Ultra has the bigger battery (7000 mAh vs 5200); the main camera is 50 MP vs 200 MP; the Vivo X300 Ultra is faster in AnTuTu (4,247,433 vs 1,724,757); the Infinix Note 50 Pro+ is noticeably lighter (209g vs 230g).
Profile comparison
Category scores
Infinix Note 50 Pro+
Vivo X300 Ultra
What makes Infinix Note 50 Pro+ better?
- Higher refresh rate: 144Hz vs 120Hz
- Faster wireless charging: 50W vs 40W
- Lighter: 209g vs 230g
- Cheaper at launch: $280 vs $950
- Better portability (54/100 vs 39/100)
What makes Vivo X300 Ultra better?
- Higher AnTuTu: 4247433 vs 1724757
- Better Geekbench Single: 3639 vs 1398
- Better Geekbench Multi: 11047 vs 4313
- Bigger battery: 7000 vs 5200 mAh
- Better main camera: 200MP vs 50MP
- Higher performance (99/100 vs 70/100)
- Better camera (96/100 vs 61/100)
- Longer battery life (85/100 vs 80/100)
Comparison verdict
Comparing the Infinix Note 50 Pro+ vs the Vivo X300 Ultra, the Vivo X300 Ultra scores 20 points higher (91/100 vs 71/100). In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra leads (99/100 vs 70/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra leads (96/100 vs 61/100). Value score: Infinix Note 50 Pro+ — 86/100, Vivo X300 Ultra — 94/100; it shows how far a model sits above or below the usual level for its price, and is not part of the overall rating. In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra notably outperforms the Infinix Note 50 Pro+ (99/100 vs 70/100). In the "display" category, both devices are on the same level — 89/100. In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Infinix Note 50 Pro+ (96/100 vs 61/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra is a bit better (85/100 vs 80/100). In the "portability" category, the Infinix Note 50 Pro+ notably outperforms the Vivo X300 Ultra (54/100 vs 39/100).
Specs comparison
| Specification | Infinix Note 50 Pro+ | Vivo X300 Ultra | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | MediaTek Dimensity 8350 | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 | |
| AnTuTu | 1724757 | 4247433 | |
| Geekbench Single | 1398 | 3639 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 4313 | 11047 | |
| Display | 6.8" AMOLED | 6.8" LTPO OLED | |
| Resolution | 1080x2436 | 3168x1440 | |
| Refresh rate | 144 Hz | 120 Hz | |
| Battery | 5200 mAh | 7000 mAh | |
| Charging | 100W | 100W | |
| Wireless charging | 50W | 40W | |
| DXOMark (camera) | — | 170 | |
| Main camera | 50 MP | 200 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 8 MP | 50 MP | |
| Telephoto | 50 MP | 200 MP | |
| Front camera | 32 MP | 32 MP | |
| RAM | 12GB | 12GB / 16GB | |
| Storage | 256GB | 256GB / 512GB / 1TB | |
| OS | Android 15 | Android 16 | |
| Brightness (peak) | 1300 nits | — | |
| NFC | yes | yes | |
| Protection | IP64 | IP69 | |
| Dimensions | 163.4×74.5×8.0 mm | 163.0×76.8×8.2 mm | |
| Weight | 209 g | 230 g | |
| Launch price | $280 | $950 |
Camera comparison
Infinix Note 50 Pro+
- Main: 50MP f/1.9
- Ultrawide: 8MP
- Telephoto: 50MP
- Front: 32MP
Vivo X300 Ultra
- Main: 200MP f/1.6
- Ultrawide: 50MP
- Telephoto: 200MP
- Front: 32MP
Display comparison
Infinix Note 50 Pro+
- 6.8" AMOLED
- Resolution: 1080x2436
- Refresh rate: 144 Hz
Vivo X300 Ultra
- 6.8" LTPO OLED
- Resolution: 3168x1440
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Battery and charging
Infinix Note 50 Pro+
- 5200 mAh
- Wired: 100W
- Wireless: 50W
Vivo X300 Ultra
- 7000 mAh
- NanoReview test: web browsing 10:18 hrs, total 29:11 hrs
- Wired: 100W
- Wireless: 40W
Overall performance score
We compared Infinix Note 50 Pro+ and Vivo X300 Ultra, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Vivo X300 Ultra leads Infinix Note 50 Pro+ by 59.4% in our overall performance rating.
Benchmarks
Launch prices and where to check today's
Launch price difference: $670. Infinix Note 50 Pro+ was $670 cheaper at launch.
Detailed category analysis
performance
In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra notably outperforms the Infinix Note 50 Pro+ (99/100 vs 70/100).
display
In the "display" category, both devices are on the same level — 89/100.
camera
In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Infinix Note 50 Pro+ (96/100 vs 61/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra is a bit better (85/100 vs 80/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, the Infinix Note 50 Pro+ notably outperforms the Vivo X300 Ultra (54/100 vs 39/100).
Frequently asked questions
Which is better: the Infinix Note 50 Pro+ or the Vivo X300 Ultra?
The Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Infinix Note 50 Pro+ by 20 points (91/100 vs 71/100).
What is the rating of the Infinix Note 50 Pro+ and the Vivo X300 Ultra?
The Infinix Note 50 Pro+ has a MobileRank rating of 71/100, the Vivo X300 Ultra — 91/100.
Which has the better camera: the Infinix Note 50 Pro+ or the Vivo X300 Ultra?
The Vivo X300 Ultra leads on camera score (96/100 vs 61/100).
Which is more powerful: the Infinix Note 50 Pro+ or the Vivo X300 Ultra?
The Vivo X300 Ultra leads on performance (99/100 vs 70/100).
Should you choose the Infinix Note 50 Pro+ over the Vivo X300 Ultra?
The Infinix Note 50 Pro+ is a better fit for active users, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers. The Vivo X300 Ultra is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.