Honor Turbo vs Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold
The Honor Turbo (2026) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 4, while the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold (2025) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite; launch prices were $215 and $2899. By overall MobileRank rating, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold leads — 69/100 vs 58/100 (a 11-point difference). Key differences: the Honor Turbo has the bigger battery (8560 mAh vs 5600); the main camera is 50 MP vs 200 MP; the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold is faster in AnTuTu (2,926,532 vs 1,000,207); the Honor Turbo is noticeably lighter (196g vs 309g).
Profile comparison
Category scores
Honor Turbo
Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold
What makes Honor Turbo better?
- Bigger battery: 8560 vs 5600 mAh
- Faster charging: 80W vs 45W
- Lighter: 196g vs 309g
- Cheaper at launch: $215 vs $2899
- Longer battery life (74/100 vs 63/100)
- Better display (82/100 vs 70/100)
- Better portability (64/100 vs 20/100)
What makes Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold better?
- Higher AnTuTu: 2926532 vs 1000207
- Better Geekbench Single: 3013 vs 1087
- Better Geekbench Multi: 9287 vs 3148
- Better main camera: 200MP vs 50MP
- Higher performance (90/100 vs 58/100)
- Better camera (52/100 vs 34/100)
Comparison verdict
Comparing the Honor Turbo vs the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold scores 11 points higher (69/100 vs 58/100). In the "performance" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold leads (90/100 vs 58/100). In the "camera" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold leads (52/100 vs 34/100). In the "battery" category, the Honor Turbo leads (74/100 vs 63/100). Value score: Honor Turbo — 74/100, Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold — 46/100; it shows how far a model sits above or below the usual level for its price, and is not part of the overall rating. In the "performance" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold significantly outperforms the Honor Turbo (90/100 vs 58/100). In the "display" category, the Honor Turbo is a bit better (82/100 vs 70/100). In the "camera" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold notably outperforms the Honor Turbo (52/100 vs 34/100). In the "battery" category, the Honor Turbo is a bit better (74/100 vs 63/100). In the "portability" category, the Honor Turbo significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold (64/100 vs 20/100).
Specs comparison
| Specification | Honor Turbo | Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 4 | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite | |
| AnTuTu | 1000207 | 2926532 | |
| Geekbench Single | 1087 | 3013 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 3148 | 9287 | |
| Display | 6.8" AMOLED | 10.0" Dynamic AMOLED 2X | |
| Resolution | 1200x2640 | 2160x1584 | |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz | |
| Battery | 8560 mAh | 5600 mAh | |
| Charging | 80W | 45W | |
| Wireless charging | 0W | 15W | |
| Main camera | 50 MP | 200 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 5 MP | 12 MP | |
| Telephoto | 0 MP | 10 MP | |
| Front camera | 16 MP | 10 MP | |
| RAM | 8GB | 16GB | |
| Storage | 256GB | 512GB | |
| OS | Android 16 | Android 16 / One UI 8 | |
| Brightness (peak) | 6000 nits | 2600 nits | |
| NFC | yes | yes | |
| Protection | IP68/IP69 | IP48 | |
| Dimensions | 161.9×76.1×7.8 mm | 159.2×75.0×12.9 mm | |
| Weight | 196 g | 309 g | |
| Launch price | $215 | $2899 |
Camera comparison
Honor Turbo
- Main: 50MP f/1.8
- Ultrawide: 5MP
- Front: 16MP
Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold
- Main: 200MP f/1.7
- Ultrawide: 12MP
- Telephoto: 10MP
- Front: 10MP
Display comparison
Honor Turbo
- 6.8" AMOLED
- Resolution: 1200x2640
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold
- 10.0" Dynamic AMOLED 2X
- Resolution: 2160x1584
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Battery and charging
Honor Turbo
- 8560 mAh
- Wired: 80W
- No wireless charging
Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold
- 5600 mAh
- Wired: 45W
- Wireless: 15W
Overall performance score
We compared Honor Turbo and Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold leads Honor Turbo by 65.8% in our overall performance rating.
Benchmarks
Launch prices and where to check today's
Launch price difference: $2684. Honor Turbo was $2684 cheaper at launch.
Detailed category analysis
performance
In the "performance" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold significantly outperforms the Honor Turbo (90/100 vs 58/100).
display
In the "display" category, the Honor Turbo is a bit better (82/100 vs 70/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold notably outperforms the Honor Turbo (52/100 vs 34/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Honor Turbo is a bit better (74/100 vs 63/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, the Honor Turbo significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold (64/100 vs 20/100).
Frequently asked questions
Which is better: the Honor Turbo or the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold?
The Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold is noticeably better than the Honor Turbo — the overall rating gap is 11 points.
What is the rating of the Honor Turbo and the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold?
The Honor Turbo has a MobileRank rating of 58/100, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold — 69/100.
Which has the better camera: the Honor Turbo or the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold?
The Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold leads on camera score (52/100 vs 34/100).
Which is more powerful: the Honor Turbo or the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold?
The Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold leads on performance (90/100 vs 58/100).
Should you choose the Honor Turbo over the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold?
The Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold is a better fit for gamers and power users.