Honor Turbo vs Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide
The Honor Turbo (2026) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 4, while the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide (2026) runs on the Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5. By overall MobileRank rating, the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide leads — 74/100 vs 58/100 (a 16-point difference). Key differences: the Honor Turbo has the bigger battery (8560 mAh vs 4800); the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide is faster in AnTuTu (3,950,082 vs 1,000,207); the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide is thinner (4.5mm vs 7.8mm).
Profile comparison
Category scores
Honor Turbo
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide
What makes Honor Turbo better?
- Bigger battery: 8560 vs 4800 mAh
- Faster charging: 80W vs 45W
- Lighter: 196g vs 201g
- Longer battery life (74/100 vs 52/100)
- Better display (82/100 vs 80/100)
What makes Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide better?
- Higher AnTuTu: 3950082 vs 1000207
- Better Geekbench Single: 3639 vs 1087
- Better Geekbench Multi: 11047 vs 3148
- Higher performance (98/100 vs 58/100)
- Better camera (50/100 vs 34/100)
- Better portability (74/100 vs 64/100)
Comparison verdict
Comparing the Honor Turbo vs the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide, the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide scores 16 points higher (74/100 vs 58/100). In the "performance" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide leads (98/100 vs 58/100). In the "camera" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide leads (50/100 vs 34/100). In the "battery" category, the Honor Turbo leads (74/100 vs 52/100). In the "performance" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide significantly outperforms the Honor Turbo (98/100 vs 58/100). In the "display" category, the Honor Turbo and the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide are nearly equal (82/100 vs 80/100). In the "camera" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide notably outperforms the Honor Turbo (50/100 vs 34/100). In the "battery" category, the Honor Turbo notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide (74/100 vs 52/100). In the "portability" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide is a bit better (74/100 vs 64/100).
Specs comparison
| Specification | Honor Turbo | Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 4 | Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 | |
| AnTuTu | 1000207 | 3950082 | |
| Geekbench Single | 1087 | 3639 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 3148 | 11047 | |
| Display | 6.8" AMOLED | 7.6" Foldable Dynamic LTPO AMOLED 2X | |
| Resolution | 1200x2640 | 1828x2448 | |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz | |
| Battery | 8560 mAh | 4800 mAh | |
| Charging | 80W | 45W | |
| Main camera | 50 MP | 50 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 5 MP | 50 MP | |
| Front camera | 16 MP | 10 MP | |
| RAM | 8GB | 12GB / 16GB | |
| Storage | 256GB | 256GB / 512GB / 1TB | |
| OS | Android 16 | Android 17 / One UI 9 | |
| Brightness (peak) | 6000 nits | 3000 nits | |
| NFC | yes | yes | |
| Protection | IP68/IP69 | IP48 | |
| Dimensions | 161.9×76.1×7.8 mm | 161.4×123.9×4.5 mm | |
| Weight | 196 g | 201 g | |
| Launch price | $215 | — |
Camera comparison
Honor Turbo
- Main: 50MP f/1.8
- Ultrawide: 5MP
- Front: 16MP
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide
- Main: 50MP f/1.8
- Ultrawide: 50MP
- Front: 10MP
Display comparison
Honor Turbo
- 6.8" AMOLED
- Resolution: 1200x2640
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide
- 7.6" Foldable Dynamic LTPO AMOLED 2X
- Resolution: 1828x2448
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Battery and charging
Honor Turbo
- 8560 mAh
- Wired: 80W
- No wireless charging
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide
- 4800 mAh
- Wired: 45W
- Wireless: supported, wattage unknown
Overall performance score
We compared Honor Turbo and Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide leads Honor Turbo by 74.7% in our overall performance rating.
Benchmarks
Launch prices and where to check today's
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide
Price unknownDetailed category analysis
performance
In the "performance" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide significantly outperforms the Honor Turbo (98/100 vs 58/100).
display
In the "display" category, the Honor Turbo and the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide are nearly equal (82/100 vs 80/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide notably outperforms the Honor Turbo (50/100 vs 34/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Honor Turbo notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide (74/100 vs 52/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide is a bit better (74/100 vs 64/100).
Frequently asked questions
Which is better: the Honor Turbo or the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide?
The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide is noticeably better than the Honor Turbo — the overall rating gap is 16 points.
What is the rating of the Honor Turbo and the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide?
The Honor Turbo has a MobileRank rating of 58/100, the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide — 74/100.
Which has the better camera: the Honor Turbo or the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide?
The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide leads on camera score (50/100 vs 34/100).
Which is more powerful: the Honor Turbo or the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide?
The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide leads on performance (98/100 vs 58/100).
Should you choose the Honor Turbo over the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide?
The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide is a better fit for gamers and power users.