Honor Magic6 Pro vs Vivo X300 Ultra

The Honor Magic6 Pro (2024) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, while the Vivo X300 Ultra (2026) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5. By overall MobileRank rating, the Vivo X300 Ultra leads — 91/100 vs 80/100 (a 11-point difference). Key differences: the Vivo X300 Ultra has the bigger battery (7000 mAh vs 5600); the main camera is 50 MP vs 200 MP; the Vivo X300 Ultra is faster in AnTuTu (4,247,433 vs 2,345,589); per DXOMark lab testing, the Vivo X300 Ultra has the stronger camera (170 vs 158).

The Vivo X300 Ultra is noticeably better than the Honor Magic6 Pro — the overall rating gap is 11 points.
Profile comparison
Category scores
Honor Magic6 Pro
Performance 83
Display 84
Camera 86
Battery 77
Portability 34
Value for money
Vivo X300 Ultra
Performance 99
Display 89
Camera 96
Battery 85
Portability 39
Value for money 94
What makes Honor Magic6 Pro better?
  • Faster wireless charging: 66W vs 40W
  • Lighter: 225g vs 230g

  • Overall rating 80/100
What makes Vivo X300 Ultra better?
  • Higher AnTuTu: 4247433 vs 2345589
  • Better Geekbench Single: 3640 vs 2205
  • Better Geekbench Multi: 11033 vs 7192
  • Bigger battery: 7000 vs 5600 mAh
  • Faster charging: 100W vs 80W
  • Better main camera: 200MP vs 50MP

  • Higher performance (99/100 vs 83/100)
  • Better camera (96/100 vs 86/100)
  • Longer battery life (85/100 vs 77/100)
  • Better display (89/100 vs 84/100)
  • Better portability (39/100 vs 34/100)
Comparison verdict

Comparing the Honor Magic6 Pro vs the Vivo X300 Ultra, the Vivo X300 Ultra scores 11 points higher (91/100 vs 80/100). In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra leads (99/100 vs 83/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra leads (96/100 vs 86/100). In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra notably outperforms the Honor Magic6 Pro (99/100 vs 83/100). In the "display" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra is a bit better (89/100 vs 84/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra is a bit better (96/100 vs 86/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra is a bit better (85/100 vs 77/100). In the "portability" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra is a bit better (39/100 vs 34/100).

Honor Magic6 Pro: The Honor Magic6 Pro is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts, those who care about battery life.
Vivo X300 Ultra: The Vivo X300 Ultra is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.
Specs comparison
Specification Honor Magic6 Pro Vivo X300 Ultra
Processor Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5
AnTuTu 2345589 4247433
Geekbench Single 2205 3640
Geekbench Multi 7192 11033
Display 6.8" LTPO OLED 6.8" LTPO OLED
Resolution 1280x2800 3168x1440
Refresh rate 120 Hz 120 Hz
Battery 5600 mAh 7000 mAh
Charging 80W 100W
Wireless charging 66W 40W
DXOMark (camera) 158 170
Main camera 50 MP 200 MP
Ultrawide 50 MP 50 MP
Telephoto 180 MP 200 MP
Front camera 50 MP 32 MP
RAM 12GB / 16GB 12GB / 16GB
Storage 256GB / 512GB / 1TB 256GB / 512GB / 1TB
OS Android 14, up to 4 major Android upgrades, MagicOS 8 Android 16
Brightness (peak) 5000 nits
NFC yes yes
Protection IP68 IP69
Dimensions 162.5×75.8×8.9 mm 163.0×76.8×8.2 mm
Weight 225 g 230 g
Launch price $950
Camera comparison
Honor Magic6 Pro
  • Main: 50MP f/f/1.4
  • Ultrawide: 50MP
  • Telephoto: 180MP
  • Front: 50MP
86
camera
Vivo X300 Ultra
  • Main: 200MP f/f/1.6
  • Ultrawide: 50MP
  • Telephoto: 200MP
  • Front: 32MP
96
camera
Display comparison
Honor Magic6 Pro
  • 6.8" LTPO OLED
  • Resolution: 1280x2800
  • Refresh rate: 120 Hz
84
display
Vivo X300 Ultra
  • 6.8" LTPO OLED
  • Resolution: 3168x1440
  • Refresh rate: 120 Hz
89
display
Battery and charging
Honor Magic6 Pro
  • 5600 mAh
  • Wired: 80W
  • Wireless: 66W
77
battery
Vivo X300 Ultra
  • 7000 mAh
  • NanoReview test: web browsing 10:18 hrs, total 29:11 hrs
  • Wired: 100W
  • Wireless: 40W
85
battery
Overall performance score

We compared Honor Magic6 Pro and Vivo X300 Ultra, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.

Honor Magic6 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3
80/100
2345589 AnTuTu
Vivo X300 Ultra Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5
91/100 +44.8%
4247433 AnTuTu

Vivo X300 Ultra leads Honor Magic6 Pro by 44.8% in our overall performance rating.

Benchmarks
Launch prices and where to check today's
Honor Magic6 Pro
Price unknown
Vivo X300 Ultra
$950
Detailed category analysis
performance

In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra notably outperforms the Honor Magic6 Pro (99/100 vs 83/100).

display

In the "display" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra is a bit better (89/100 vs 84/100).

camera

In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra is a bit better (96/100 vs 86/100).

battery

In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra is a bit better (85/100 vs 77/100).

portability

In the "portability" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra is a bit better (39/100 vs 34/100).

Frequently asked questions
Which is better: the Honor Magic6 Pro or the Vivo X300 Ultra?

The Vivo X300 Ultra is noticeably better than the Honor Magic6 Pro — the overall rating gap is 11 points.

What is the rating of the Honor Magic6 Pro and the Vivo X300 Ultra?

The Honor Magic6 Pro has a MobileRank rating of 80/100, the Vivo X300 Ultra — 91/100.

Which has the better camera: the Honor Magic6 Pro or the Vivo X300 Ultra?

The Vivo X300 Ultra leads on camera score (96/100 vs 86/100).

Which is more powerful: the Honor Magic6 Pro or the Vivo X300 Ultra?

The Vivo X300 Ultra leads on performance (99/100 vs 83/100).

Should you choose the Honor Magic6 Pro over the Vivo X300 Ultra?

The Honor Magic6 Pro is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts, those who care about battery life. The Vivo X300 Ultra is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.