Honor Magic6 Pro vs Vivo X300 Ultra
The Honor Magic6 Pro (2024) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, while the Vivo X300 Ultra (2026) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5. By overall MobileRank rating, the Vivo X300 Ultra leads — 91/100 vs 80/100 (a 11-point difference). Key differences: the Vivo X300 Ultra has the bigger battery (7000 mAh vs 5600); the main camera is 50 MP vs 200 MP; the Vivo X300 Ultra is faster in AnTuTu (4,247,433 vs 2,345,589); per DXOMark lab testing, the Vivo X300 Ultra has the stronger camera (170 vs 158).
Profile comparison
Category scores
Honor Magic6 Pro
Vivo X300 Ultra
What makes Honor Magic6 Pro better?
- Faster wireless charging: 66W vs 40W
- Lighter: 225g vs 230g
- Overall rating 80/100
What makes Vivo X300 Ultra better?
- Higher AnTuTu: 4247433 vs 2345589
- Better Geekbench Single: 3639 vs 2203
- Better Geekbench Multi: 11047 vs 6511
- Bigger battery: 7000 vs 5600 mAh
- Faster charging: 100W vs 80W
- Better main camera: 200MP vs 50MP
- Higher performance (99/100 vs 82/100)
- Better camera (96/100 vs 86/100)
- Longer battery life (85/100 vs 77/100)
- Better display (89/100 vs 84/100)
- Better portability (39/100 vs 34/100)
Comparison verdict
Comparing the Honor Magic6 Pro vs the Vivo X300 Ultra, the Vivo X300 Ultra scores 11 points higher (91/100 vs 80/100). In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra leads (99/100 vs 82/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra leads (96/100 vs 86/100). In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra notably outperforms the Honor Magic6 Pro (99/100 vs 82/100). In the "display" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra is a bit better (89/100 vs 84/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra is a bit better (96/100 vs 86/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra is a bit better (85/100 vs 77/100). In the "portability" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra is a bit better (39/100 vs 34/100).
Specs comparison
| Specification | Honor Magic6 Pro | Vivo X300 Ultra | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 | |
| AnTuTu | 2345589 | 4247433 | |
| Geekbench Single | 2203 | 3639 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 6511 | 11047 | |
| Display | 6.8" LTPO OLED | 6.8" LTPO OLED | |
| Resolution | 1280x2800 | 3168x1440 | |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz | |
| Battery | 5600 mAh | 7000 mAh | |
| Charging | 80W | 100W | |
| Wireless charging | 66W | 40W | |
| DXOMark (camera) | 158 | 170 | |
| Main camera | 50 MP | 200 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 50 MP | 50 MP | |
| Telephoto | 180 MP | 200 MP | |
| Front camera | 50 MP | 32 MP | |
| RAM | 12GB / 16GB | 12GB / 16GB | |
| Storage | 256GB / 512GB / 1TB | 256GB / 512GB / 1TB | |
| OS | Android 14, up to 4 major Android upgrades, MagicOS 8 | Android 16 | |
| Brightness (peak) | 5000 nits | — | |
| NFC | yes | yes | |
| Protection | IP68 | IP69 | |
| Dimensions | 162.5×75.8×8.9 mm | 163.0×76.8×8.2 mm | |
| Weight | 225 g | 230 g | |
| Launch price | — | $950 |
Camera comparison
Honor Magic6 Pro
- Main: 50MP f/1.4
- Ultrawide: 50MP
- Telephoto: 180MP
- Front: 50MP
Vivo X300 Ultra
- Main: 200MP f/1.6
- Ultrawide: 50MP
- Telephoto: 200MP
- Front: 32MP
Display comparison
Honor Magic6 Pro
- 6.8" LTPO OLED
- Resolution: 1280x2800
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Vivo X300 Ultra
- 6.8" LTPO OLED
- Resolution: 3168x1440
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Battery and charging
Honor Magic6 Pro
- 5600 mAh
- Wired: 80W
- Wireless: 66W
Vivo X300 Ultra
- 7000 mAh
- NanoReview test: web browsing 10:18 hrs, total 29:11 hrs
- Wired: 100W
- Wireless: 40W
Overall performance score
We compared Honor Magic6 Pro and Vivo X300 Ultra, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Vivo X300 Ultra leads Honor Magic6 Pro by 44.8% in our overall performance rating.
Benchmarks
Launch prices and where to check today's
Honor Magic6 Pro
Price unknownDetailed category analysis
performance
In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra notably outperforms the Honor Magic6 Pro (99/100 vs 82/100).
display
In the "display" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra is a bit better (89/100 vs 84/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra is a bit better (96/100 vs 86/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra is a bit better (85/100 vs 77/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra is a bit better (39/100 vs 34/100).
Frequently asked questions
Which is better: the Honor Magic6 Pro or the Vivo X300 Ultra?
The Vivo X300 Ultra is noticeably better than the Honor Magic6 Pro — the overall rating gap is 11 points.
What is the rating of the Honor Magic6 Pro and the Vivo X300 Ultra?
The Honor Magic6 Pro has a MobileRank rating of 80/100, the Vivo X300 Ultra — 91/100.
Which has the better camera: the Honor Magic6 Pro or the Vivo X300 Ultra?
The Vivo X300 Ultra leads on camera score (96/100 vs 86/100).
Which is more powerful: the Honor Magic6 Pro or the Vivo X300 Ultra?
The Vivo X300 Ultra leads on performance (99/100 vs 82/100).
Should you choose the Honor Magic6 Pro over the Vivo X300 Ultra?
The Honor Magic6 Pro is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts, those who care about battery life. The Vivo X300 Ultra is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.