Honor Magic5 Pro vs Vivo X300 Ultra
The Honor Magic5 Pro (2023) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, while the Vivo X300 Ultra (2026) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5; launch prices were $900 and $950. By overall MobileRank rating, the Vivo X300 Ultra leads — 91/100 vs 75/100 (a 16-point difference). Key differences: the Vivo X300 Ultra has the bigger battery (7000 mAh vs 5100); the main camera is 50 MP vs 200 MP; the Vivo X300 Ultra is faster in AnTuTu (4,247,433 vs 1,754,213); per DXOMark lab testing, the Vivo X300 Ultra has the stronger camera (170 vs 152).
Honor Magic5 Pro
Vivo X300 Ultra
- Faster wireless charging: 50W vs 40W
- Lighter: 219g vs 230g
- Cheaper at launch: $900 vs $950
- Overall rating 75/100
- Higher AnTuTu: 4247433 vs 1754213
- Better Geekbench Single: 3640 vs 2004
- Better Geekbench Multi: 11033 vs 5311
- Bigger battery: 7000 vs 5100 mAh
- Faster charging: 100W vs 66W
- Better main camera: 200MP vs 50MP
- Higher performance (99/100 vs 75/100)
- Better camera (96/100 vs 82/100)
- Longer battery life (85/100 vs 70/100)
- Better display (89/100 vs 85/100)
Comparing the Honor Magic5 Pro vs the Vivo X300 Ultra, the Vivo X300 Ultra scores 16 points higher (91/100 vs 75/100). In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra leads (99/100 vs 75/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra leads (96/100 vs 82/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra leads (85/100 vs 70/100). Value score: Honor Magic5 Pro — 62/100, Vivo X300 Ultra — 94/100; it is biased by price level, so it should not be compared directly between devices at different prices. In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra notably outperforms the Honor Magic5 Pro (99/100 vs 75/100). In the "display" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra and the Honor Magic5 Pro are nearly equal (89/100 vs 85/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra is a bit better (96/100 vs 82/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra notably outperforms the Honor Magic5 Pro (85/100 vs 70/100). In the "portability" category, both devices are on the same level — 39/100.
| Specification | Honor Magic5 Pro | Vivo X300 Ultra | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 | |
| AnTuTu | 1754213 | 4247433 | |
| Geekbench Single | 2004 | 3640 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 5311 | 11033 | |
| Display | 6.8" LTPO OLED | 6.8" LTPO OLED | |
| Resolution | 2848x1312 | 3168x1440 | |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz | |
| Battery | 5100 mAh | 7000 mAh | |
| Charging | 66W | 100W | |
| Wireless charging | 50W | 40W | |
| DXOMark (camera) | 152 | 170 | |
| Main camera | 50 MP | 200 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 50 MP | 50 MP | |
| Telephoto | 50 MP | 200 MP | |
| Front camera | 12 MP | 32 MP | |
| RAM | 8GB / 12GB | 12GB / 16GB | |
| Storage | 256GB / 512GB | 256GB / 512GB / 1TB | |
| OS | Android 13 | Android 16 | |
| Brightness (peak) | 1800 nits | — | |
| NFC | yes | yes | |
| Protection | IP68 | IP69 | |
| Dimensions | 162.9×76.7×8.8 mm | 163.0×76.8×8.2 mm | |
| Weight | 219 g | 230 g | |
| Launch price | $900 | $950 |
Honor Magic5 Pro
- Main: 50MP f/1.6
- Ultrawide: 50MP
- Telephoto: 50MP
- Front: 12MP
Vivo X300 Ultra
- Main: 200MP f/f/1.6
- Ultrawide: 50MP
- Telephoto: 200MP
- Front: 32MP
Honor Magic5 Pro
- 6.8" LTPO OLED
- Resolution: 2848x1312
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Vivo X300 Ultra
- 6.8" LTPO OLED
- Resolution: 3168x1440
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Honor Magic5 Pro
- 5100 mAh
- Wired: 66W
- Wireless: 50W
Vivo X300 Ultra
- 7000 mAh
- NanoReview test: web browsing 10:18 hrs, total 29:11 hrs
- Wired: 100W
- Wireless: 40W
We compared Honor Magic5 Pro and Vivo X300 Ultra, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Vivo X300 Ultra leads Honor Magic5 Pro by 58.7% in our overall performance rating.
Launch price difference: $50. Honor Magic5 Pro was $50 cheaper at launch.
performance
In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra notably outperforms the Honor Magic5 Pro (99/100 vs 75/100).
display
In the "display" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra and the Honor Magic5 Pro are nearly equal (89/100 vs 85/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra is a bit better (96/100 vs 82/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra notably outperforms the Honor Magic5 Pro (85/100 vs 70/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, both devices are on the same level — 39/100.
Which is better: the Honor Magic5 Pro or the Vivo X300 Ultra?
The Vivo X300 Ultra is noticeably better than the Honor Magic5 Pro — the overall rating gap is 16 points.
What is the rating of the Honor Magic5 Pro and the Vivo X300 Ultra?
The Honor Magic5 Pro has a MobileRank rating of 75/100, the Vivo X300 Ultra — 91/100.
Which has the better camera: the Honor Magic5 Pro or the Vivo X300 Ultra?
The Vivo X300 Ultra leads on camera score (96/100 vs 82/100).
Which is more powerful: the Honor Magic5 Pro or the Vivo X300 Ultra?
The Vivo X300 Ultra leads on performance (99/100 vs 75/100).
Should you choose the Honor Magic5 Pro over the Vivo X300 Ultra?
The Honor Magic5 Pro is a better fit for active users, mobile photography enthusiasts. The Vivo X300 Ultra is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.