Honor Magic5 Pro vs Vivo X300 Pro
The Honor Magic5 Pro (2023) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, while the Vivo X300 Pro (2025) runs on the Dimensity 9500; launch prices were $900 and $899. By overall MobileRank rating, the Vivo X300 Pro leads — 87/100 vs 75/100 (a 12-point difference). Key differences: the Vivo X300 Pro has the bigger battery (6510 mAh vs 5100); the main camera is 50 MP vs 200 MP; the Vivo X300 Pro is faster in AnTuTu (3,269,794 vs 1,754,213); per DXOMark lab testing, the Vivo X300 Pro has the stronger camera (171 vs 152).
Honor Magic5 Pro
Vivo X300 Pro
- Faster wireless charging: 50W vs 40W
- Lighter: 219g vs 226g
- Better display (85/100 vs 84/100)
- Higher AnTuTu: 3269794 vs 1754213
- Better Geekbench Single: 3228 vs 2004
- Better Geekbench Multi: 9553 vs 5311
- Bigger battery: 6510 vs 5100 mAh
- Faster charging: 90W vs 66W
- Better main camera: 200MP vs 50MP
- Cheaper at launch: $899 vs $900
- Higher performance (93/100 vs 75/100)
- Better camera (96/100 vs 82/100)
- Longer battery life (81/100 vs 70/100)
- Better portability (43/100 vs 39/100)
Comparing the Honor Magic5 Pro vs the Vivo X300 Pro, the Vivo X300 Pro scores 12 points higher (87/100 vs 75/100). In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 Pro leads (93/100 vs 75/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Pro leads (96/100 vs 82/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Pro leads (81/100 vs 70/100). Value score: Honor Magic5 Pro — 62/100, Vivo X300 Pro — 86/100; it is biased by price level, so it should not be compared directly between devices at different prices. In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 Pro notably outperforms the Honor Magic5 Pro (93/100 vs 75/100). In the "display" category, the Honor Magic5 Pro and the Vivo X300 Pro are nearly equal (85/100 vs 84/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Pro is a bit better (96/100 vs 82/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Pro is a bit better (81/100 vs 70/100). In the "portability" category, the Vivo X300 Pro and the Honor Magic5 Pro are nearly equal (43/100 vs 39/100).
| Specification | Honor Magic5 Pro | Vivo X300 Pro | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 | Dimensity 9500 | |
| AnTuTu | 1754213 | 3269794 | |
| Geekbench Single | 2004 | 3228 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 5311 | 9553 | |
| Display | 6.8" LTPO OLED | 6.8" AMOLED | |
| Resolution | 2848x1312 | 1260x2800 | |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz | |
| Battery | 5100 mAh | 6510 mAh | |
| Charging | 66W | 90W | |
| Wireless charging | 50W | 40W | |
| DXOMark (camera) | 152 | 171 | |
| Main camera | 50 MP | 200 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 50 MP | 50 MP | |
| Telephoto | 50 MP | 50 MP | |
| Front camera | 12 MP | 32 MP | |
| RAM | 8GB / 12GB | 12GB / 16GB | |
| Storage | 256GB / 512GB | 256GB / 512GB / 1TB | |
| OS | Android 13 | Android 16 | |
| Brightness (peak) | 1800 nits | 4500 nits | |
| NFC | yes | yes | |
| Protection | IP68 | IP68 | |
| Dimensions | 162.9×76.7×8.8 mm | 161.2×75.5×8.0 mm | |
| Weight | 219 g | 226 g | |
| Launch price | $900 | $899 |
Honor Magic5 Pro
- Main: 50MP f/1.6
- Ultrawide: 50MP
- Telephoto: 50MP
- Front: 12MP
Vivo X300 Pro
- Main: 200MP f/f/1.57
- Ultrawide: 50MP
- Telephoto: 50MP
- Front: 32MP
Honor Magic5 Pro
- 6.8" LTPO OLED
- Resolution: 2848x1312
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Vivo X300 Pro
- 6.8" AMOLED
- Resolution: 1260x2800
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Honor Magic5 Pro
- 5100 mAh
- Wired: 66W
- Wireless: 50W
Vivo X300 Pro
- 6510 mAh
- NanoReview test: web browsing 13:30 hrs, total 24:37 hrs
- Wired: 90W
- Wireless: 40W
We compared Honor Magic5 Pro and Vivo X300 Pro, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Vivo X300 Pro leads Honor Magic5 Pro by 46.4% in our overall performance rating.
Launch price difference: $1. Vivo X300 Pro was $1 cheaper at launch.
performance
In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 Pro notably outperforms the Honor Magic5 Pro (93/100 vs 75/100).
display
In the "display" category, the Honor Magic5 Pro and the Vivo X300 Pro are nearly equal (85/100 vs 84/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Pro is a bit better (96/100 vs 82/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Pro is a bit better (81/100 vs 70/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, the Vivo X300 Pro and the Honor Magic5 Pro are nearly equal (43/100 vs 39/100).
Which is better: the Honor Magic5 Pro or the Vivo X300 Pro?
The Vivo X300 Pro is noticeably better than the Honor Magic5 Pro — the overall rating gap is 12 points.
What is the rating of the Honor Magic5 Pro and the Vivo X300 Pro?
The Honor Magic5 Pro has a MobileRank rating of 75/100, the Vivo X300 Pro — 87/100.
Which has the better camera: the Honor Magic5 Pro or the Vivo X300 Pro?
The Vivo X300 Pro leads on camera score (96/100 vs 82/100).
Which is more powerful: the Honor Magic5 Pro or the Vivo X300 Pro?
The Vivo X300 Pro leads on performance (93/100 vs 75/100).
Should you choose the Honor Magic5 Pro over the Vivo X300 Pro?
The Honor Magic5 Pro is a better fit for active users, mobile photography enthusiasts. The Vivo X300 Pro is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.