Honor 600 Smart vs Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold
The Honor 600 Smart (2026) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 4 Gen 4, while the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold (2025) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite. By overall MobileRank rating, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold leads — 57/100 vs 32/100 (a 25-point difference). Key differences: the Honor 600 Smart has the bigger battery (7700 mAh vs 5600); the main camera is 50 MP vs 200 MP; the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold is faster in AnTuTu (2,926,532 vs 600,942); the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold has NFC for contactless payments, the Honor 600 Smart doesn't; the Honor 600 Smart is thinner (8.3mm vs 12.9mm).
Honor 600 Smart
Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold
- Bigger battery: 7700 vs 5600 mAh
- Longer battery life (59/100 vs 52/100)
- Better design/ergonomics (50/100 vs 0/100)
- Better value for money (55/100 vs 0/100)
- Higher AnTuTu: 2926532 vs 600942
- Better Geekbench Single: 3050 vs 930
- Better Geekbench Multi: 9300 vs 2210
- Better main camera: 200MP vs 50MP
- Higher performance (67/100 vs 0/100)
- Better camera (49/100 vs 24/100)
Comparing the Honor 600 Smart vs the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold scores 25 points higher (57/100 vs 32/100). In the "performance" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold leads (67/100 vs 0/100). In the "camera" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold leads (49/100 vs 24/100). In the "value for money" category, the Honor 600 Smart leads (55/100 vs 0/100). In the "performance" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold significantly outperforms the Honor 600 Smart (67/100 vs 0/100). In the "display" category, both devices are on the same level — 100/100. In the "camera" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold notably outperforms the Honor 600 Smart (49/100 vs 24/100). In the "battery" category, the Honor 600 Smart is a bit better (59/100 vs 52/100). In the "design" category, the Honor 600 Smart significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold (50/100 vs 0/100). In the "value for money" category, the Honor 600 Smart significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold (55/100 vs 0/100).
| Specification | Honor 600 Smart | Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | Qualcomm Snapdragon 4 Gen 4 | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite | |
| AnTuTu | 600942 | 2926532 | |
| Geekbench Single | 930 | 3050 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 2210 | 9300 | |
| Display | 6.9" IPS LCD | 10.0" Dynamic AMOLED 2X | |
| Resolution | 720x1592 | 2160x1584 | |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz | |
| Battery | 7700 mAh | 5600 mAh | |
| Charging | 45W | 45W | |
| Wireless charging | 0W | 15W | |
| Main camera | 50 MP | 200 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 0 MP | 12 MP | |
| Telephoto | 0 MP | 10 MP | |
| Front camera | — | 10 MP | |
| RAM | 4GB | 16GB | |
| Storage | 128GB | 512GB | |
| OS | Android 16, MagicOS 10 | Android 16 / One UI 8 | |
| Brightness (peak) | 1020 nits | 2600 nits | |
| NFC | no | yes | |
| Protection | IP64 | IP48 | |
| Dimensions | 168.3×78.5×8.3 mm | 159.2×75.0×12.9 mm | |
| Weight | — | 309 g | |
| Price | — | $2899 |
Honor 600 Smart
- Main: 50MP
- Front: —
Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold
- Main: 200MP f/f/1.7
- Ultrawide: 12MP
- Telephoto: 10MP
- Front: 10MP
Honor 600 Smart
- 6.9" IPS LCD
- Resolution: 720x1592
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold
- 10.0" Dynamic AMOLED 2X
- Resolution: 2160x1584
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Honor 600 Smart
- 7700 mAh
- Wired: 45W
- No wireless charging
Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold
- 5600 mAh
- Wired: 45W
- Wireless: 15W
We compared Honor 600 Smart and Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold leads Honor 600 Smart by 79.5% in our overall performance rating.
Honor 600 Smart
Price unknownperformance
In the "performance" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold significantly outperforms the Honor 600 Smart (67/100 vs 0/100).
display
In the "display" category, both devices are on the same level — 100/100.
camera
In the "camera" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold notably outperforms the Honor 600 Smart (49/100 vs 24/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Honor 600 Smart is a bit better (59/100 vs 52/100).
design
In the "design" category, the Honor 600 Smart significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold (50/100 vs 0/100).
value for money
In the "value for money" category, the Honor 600 Smart significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold (55/100 vs 0/100).
Which is better: the Honor 600 Smart or the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold?
The Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold significantly outperforms the Honor 600 Smart by 25 points (57/100 vs 32/100).
What is the rating of the Honor 600 Smart and the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold?
The Honor 600 Smart has a MobileRank rating of 32/100, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold — 57/100.
Which has the better camera: the Honor 600 Smart or the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold?
The Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold leads on camera score (49/100 vs 24/100).
Which is more powerful: the Honor 600 Smart or the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold?
The Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold leads on performance (67/100 vs 0/100).
Should you choose the Honor 600 Smart over the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold?
The Honor 600 Smart is a better fit for everyday use. The Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold is a better fit for active users.