Honor X40 GT Racing vs Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold
Comparing the Honor X40 GT Racing (2023) and the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold (2025) on specs and benchmarks. By overall MobileRank rating, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold leads — 57/100 vs 30/100 (a 27-point difference). Key differences: the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold has the bigger battery (5600 mAh vs 4800); the main camera is 50 MP vs 200 MP; the Honor X40 GT Racing is noticeably lighter (199g vs 309g).
Honor X40 GT Racing
Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold
- Faster charging: 66W vs 45W
- Higher refresh rate: 144Hz vs 120Hz
- Lighter: 199g vs 309g
- Better design/ergonomics (51/100 vs 0/100)
- Better value for money (55/100 vs 0/100)
- Bigger battery: 5600 vs 4800 mAh
- Better main camera: 200MP vs 50MP
- Higher performance (67/100 vs 0/100)
- Better camera (49/100 vs 27/100)
- Longer battery life (52/100 vs 43/100)
Comparing the Honor X40 GT Racing vs the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold scores 27 points higher (57/100 vs 30/100). In the "performance" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold leads (67/100 vs 0/100). In the "camera" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold leads (49/100 vs 27/100). In the "value for money" category, the Honor X40 GT Racing leads (55/100 vs 0/100). In the "performance" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold significantly outperforms the Honor X40 GT Racing (67/100 vs 0/100). In the "display" category, both devices are on the same level — 100/100. In the "camera" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold notably outperforms the Honor X40 GT Racing (49/100 vs 27/100). In the "battery" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold is a bit better (52/100 vs 43/100). In the "design" category, the Honor X40 GT Racing significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold (51/100 vs 0/100). In the "value for money" category, the Honor X40 GT Racing significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold (55/100 vs 0/100).
| Specification | Honor X40 GT Racing | Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | — | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite | |
| AnTuTu | — | 2926532 | |
| Geekbench Single | — | 3050 | |
| Geekbench Multi | — | 9300 | |
| Display | 6.8" IPS LCD | 10.0" Dynamic AMOLED 2X | |
| Resolution | 1080x2388 | 2160x1584 | |
| Refresh rate | 144 Hz | 120 Hz | |
| Battery | 4800 mAh | 5600 mAh | |
| Charging | 66W | 45W | |
| Wireless charging | 0W | 15W | |
| Main camera | 50 MP | 200 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 0 MP | 12 MP | |
| Telephoto | 0 MP | 10 MP | |
| Front camera | 16 MP | 10 MP | |
| RAM | 12GB | 16GB | |
| Storage | 256GB / 512GB | 512GB | |
| OS | Android 13, Magic OS 7.1 | Android 16 / One UI 8 | |
| Brightness (peak) | — | 2600 nits | |
| NFC | yes | yes | |
| Protection | — | IP48 | |
| Dimensions | 166.1×75.8×8.5 mm | 159.2×75.0×12.9 mm | |
| Weight | 199 g | 309 g | |
| Price | — | $2899 |
Honor X40 GT Racing
- Main: 50MP f/f/1.8
- Front: 16MP
Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold
- Main: 200MP f/f/1.7
- Ultrawide: 12MP
- Telephoto: 10MP
- Front: 10MP
Honor X40 GT Racing
- 6.8" IPS LCD
- Resolution: 1080x2388
- Refresh rate: 144 Hz
Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold
- 10.0" Dynamic AMOLED 2X
- Resolution: 2160x1584
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Honor X40 GT Racing
- 4800 mAh
- Wired: 66W
- No wireless charging
Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold
- 5600 mAh
- Wired: 45W
- Wireless: 15W
Honor X40 GT Racing
Price unknownperformance
In the "performance" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold significantly outperforms the Honor X40 GT Racing (67/100 vs 0/100).
display
In the "display" category, both devices are on the same level — 100/100.
camera
In the "camera" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold notably outperforms the Honor X40 GT Racing (49/100 vs 27/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold is a bit better (52/100 vs 43/100).
design
In the "design" category, the Honor X40 GT Racing significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold (51/100 vs 0/100).
value for money
In the "value for money" category, the Honor X40 GT Racing significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold (55/100 vs 0/100).
Which is better: the Honor X40 GT Racing or the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold?
The Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold significantly outperforms the Honor X40 GT Racing by 27 points (57/100 vs 30/100).
What is the rating of the Honor X40 GT Racing and the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold?
The Honor X40 GT Racing has a MobileRank rating of 30/100, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold — 57/100.
Which has the better camera: the Honor X40 GT Racing or the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold?
The Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold leads on camera score (49/100 vs 27/100).
Which is more powerful: the Honor X40 GT Racing or the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold?
The Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold leads on performance (67/100 vs 0/100).
Should you choose the Honor X40 GT Racing over the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold?
The Honor X40 GT Racing is a better fit for everyday use. The Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold is a better fit for active users.