Apple iPhone Fold vs Vivo X300 Pro
The Apple iPhone Fold (2026) runs on the Apple A19 Pro, while the Vivo X300 Pro (2025) runs on the Dimensity 9500. By overall MobileRank rating, the Vivo X300 Pro leads — 87/100 vs 77/100 (a 10-point difference). Key differences: the main camera is 48 MP vs 200 MP; the Vivo X300 Pro is faster in AnTuTu (3,269,794 vs 2,568,709).
Apple iPhone Fold
Vivo X300 Pro
- Better Geekbench Single: 3970 vs 3228
- Better Geekbench Multi: 10558 vs 9553
- Overall rating 77/100
- Higher AnTuTu: 3269794 vs 2568709
- Better main camera: 200MP vs 48MP
- Higher performance (93/100 vs 92/100)
- Better camera (96/100 vs 53/100)
- Better display (84/100 vs 82/100)
Comparing the Apple iPhone Fold vs the Vivo X300 Pro, the Vivo X300 Pro scores 10 points higher (87/100 vs 77/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Pro leads (96/100 vs 53/100). In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 Pro and the Apple iPhone Fold are nearly equal (93/100 vs 92/100). In the "display" category, the Vivo X300 Pro and the Apple iPhone Fold are nearly equal (84/100 vs 82/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Pro significantly outperforms the Apple iPhone Fold (96/100 vs 53/100).
| Specification | Apple iPhone Fold | Vivo X300 Pro | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | Apple A19 Pro | Dimensity 9500 | |
| AnTuTu | 2568709 | 3269794 | |
| Geekbench Single | 3970 | 3228 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 10558 | 9553 | |
| Display | 7.8" Foldable LTPO OLED | 6.8" AMOLED | |
| Resolution | 1920x2713 | 1260x2800 | |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz | |
| Battery | — | 6510 mAh | |
| Charging | — | 90W | |
| Wireless charging | — | 40W | |
| DXOMark (camera) | — | 171 | |
| Main camera | 48 MP | 200 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 48 MP | 50 MP | |
| Telephoto | 12 MP | 50 MP | |
| Front camera | 4 MP | 32 MP | |
| RAM | 12GB | 12GB / 16GB | |
| Storage | 256GB / 512GB / 1TB | 256GB / 512GB / 1TB | |
| OS | iOS 19 | Android 16 | |
| Brightness (peak) | — | 4500 nits | |
| NFC | yes | yes | |
| Protection | — | IP68 | |
| Dimensions | — | 161.2×75.5×8.0 mm | |
| Weight | — | 226 g | |
| Price | — | $899 |
Apple iPhone Fold
- Main: 48MP f/f/1.8
- Ultrawide: 48MP
- Telephoto: 12MP
- Front: 4MP
Vivo X300 Pro
- Main: 200MP f/f/1.57
- Ultrawide: 50MP
- Telephoto: 50MP
- Front: 32MP
Apple iPhone Fold
- 7.8" Foldable LTPO OLED
- Resolution: 1920x2713
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Vivo X300 Pro
- 6.8" AMOLED
- Resolution: 1260x2800
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Apple iPhone Fold
- —
- Wireless charging: no data
Vivo X300 Pro
- 6510 mAh
- NanoReview test: web browsing 13:30 hrs, total 24:37 hrs
- Wired: 90W
- Wireless: 40W
We compared Apple iPhone Fold and Vivo X300 Pro, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Vivo X300 Pro leads Apple iPhone Fold by 21.4% in our overall performance rating.
Apple iPhone Fold
Price unknownperformance
In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 Pro and the Apple iPhone Fold are nearly equal (93/100 vs 92/100).
display
In the "display" category, the Vivo X300 Pro and the Apple iPhone Fold are nearly equal (84/100 vs 82/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Pro significantly outperforms the Apple iPhone Fold (96/100 vs 53/100).
Which is better: the Apple iPhone Fold or the Vivo X300 Pro?
The Vivo X300 Pro is noticeably better than the Apple iPhone Fold — the overall rating gap is 10 points.
What is the rating of the Apple iPhone Fold and the Vivo X300 Pro?
The Apple iPhone Fold has a MobileRank rating of 77/100, the Vivo X300 Pro — 87/100.
Which has the better camera: the Apple iPhone Fold or the Vivo X300 Pro?
The Vivo X300 Pro leads on camera score (96/100 vs 53/100).
Should you choose the Apple iPhone Fold over the Vivo X300 Pro?
The Apple iPhone Fold is a better fit for gamers and power users. The Vivo X300 Pro is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.