Apple iPhone 17 Pro Max vs Vivo X300 Pro

The Apple iPhone 17 Pro Max (2025) runs on the Apple A19 Pro, while the Vivo X300 Pro (2025) runs on the Dimensity 9500; estimated prices are $1199 and $899. By overall MobileRank rating, the Vivo X300 Pro leads — 87/100 vs 75/100 (a 12-point difference). Key differences: the Vivo X300 Pro has the bigger battery (6510 mAh vs 4823); the main camera is 48 MP vs 200 MP; the Vivo X300 Pro is faster in AnTuTu (3,269,794 vs 2,601,000).

The Vivo X300 Pro is noticeably better than the Apple iPhone 17 Pro Max — the overall rating gap is 12 points.
Profile comparison
Category scores
Apple iPhone 17 Pro Max
Performance 92
Display 85
Camera 71
Battery 53
Portability 30
Value for money 60
Vivo X300 Pro
Performance 93
Display 84
Camera 96
Battery 81
Portability 43
Value for money 86
What makes Apple iPhone 17 Pro Max better?
  • Better Geekbench Single: 3933 vs 3228
  • Better Geekbench Multi: 10223 vs 9553

  • Better display (85/100 vs 84/100)
What makes Vivo X300 Pro better?
  • Higher AnTuTu: 3269794 vs 2601000
  • Bigger battery: 6510 vs 4823 mAh
  • Faster charging: 90W vs 40W
  • Better main camera: 200MP vs 48MP
  • Faster wireless charging: 40W vs 25W
  • Lighter: 226g vs 233g
  • Cheaper: $899 vs $1199

  • Higher performance (93/100 vs 92/100)
  • Better camera (96/100 vs 71/100)
  • Longer battery life (81/100 vs 53/100)
  • Better portability (43/100 vs 30/100)
  • Better value for money (86/100 vs 60/100)
Comparison verdict

Comparing the Apple iPhone 17 Pro Max vs the Vivo X300 Pro, the Vivo X300 Pro scores 12 points higher (87/100 vs 75/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Pro leads (96/100 vs 71/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Pro leads (81/100 vs 53/100). In the "value for money" category, the Vivo X300 Pro leads (86/100 vs 60/100). In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 Pro and the Apple iPhone 17 Pro Max are nearly equal (93/100 vs 92/100). In the "display" category, the Apple iPhone 17 Pro Max and the Vivo X300 Pro are nearly equal (85/100 vs 84/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Pro notably outperforms the Apple iPhone 17 Pro Max (96/100 vs 71/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Pro notably outperforms the Apple iPhone 17 Pro Max (81/100 vs 53/100). In the "portability" category, the Vivo X300 Pro is a bit better (43/100 vs 30/100). In the "value for money" category, the Vivo X300 Pro notably outperforms the Apple iPhone 17 Pro Max (86/100 vs 60/100).

Apple iPhone 17 Pro Max: The Apple iPhone 17 Pro Max is a better fit for gamers and power users.
Vivo X300 Pro: The Vivo X300 Pro is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.
Specs comparison
Specification Apple iPhone 17 Pro Max Vivo X300 Pro
Processor Apple A19 Pro Dimensity 9500
AnTuTu 2601000 3269794
Geekbench Single 3933 3228
Geekbench Multi 10223 9553
Display 6.9" LTPO Super Retina XDR OLED 6.8" AMOLED
Resolution 2868x1320 1260x2800
Refresh rate 120 Hz 120 Hz
Battery 4823 mAh 6510 mAh
Charging 40W 90W
Wireless charging 25W 40W
DXOMark (camera) 171
Main camera 48 MP 200 MP
Ultrawide 48 MP 50 MP
Telephoto 48 MP 50 MP
Front camera 18 MP 32 MP
RAM 12GB 12GB / 16GB
Storage 256GB / 512GB / 1TB / 2TB 256GB / 512GB / 1TB
OS iOS 26 Android 16
Brightness (peak) 3000 nits 4500 nits
NFC yes yes
Protection IP68 IP68
Dimensions 163.4×78.0×8.8 mm 161.2×75.5×8.0 mm
Weight 233 g 226 g
Price $1199 $899
Camera comparison
Apple iPhone 17 Pro Max
  • Main: 48MP f/f/1.78
  • Ultrawide: 48MP
  • Telephoto: 48MP
  • Front: 18MP
71
camera
Vivo X300 Pro
  • Main: 200MP f/f/1.57
  • Ultrawide: 50MP
  • Telephoto: 50MP
  • Front: 32MP
96
camera
Display comparison
Apple iPhone 17 Pro Max
  • 6.9" LTPO Super Retina XDR OLED
  • Resolution: 2868x1320
  • Refresh rate: 120 Hz
85
display
Vivo X300 Pro
  • 6.8" AMOLED
  • Resolution: 1260x2800
  • Refresh rate: 120 Hz
84
display
Battery and charging
Apple iPhone 17 Pro Max
  • 4823 mAh
  • Wired: 40W
  • Wireless: 25W
53
battery
Vivo X300 Pro
  • 6510 mAh
  • NanoReview test: web browsing 13:30 hrs, total 24:37 hrs
  • Wired: 90W
  • Wireless: 40W
81
battery
Overall performance score

We compared Apple iPhone 17 Pro Max and Vivo X300 Pro, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.

Apple iPhone 17 Pro Max Apple A19 Pro
75/100
2601000 AnTuTu
Vivo X300 Pro Dimensity 9500
87/100 +20.5%
3269794 AnTuTu

Vivo X300 Pro leads Apple iPhone 17 Pro Max by 20.5% in our overall performance rating.

Benchmarks
Price and availability
Apple iPhone 17 Pro Max
$1199
Vivo X300 Pro
$899

Price difference: $300. Vivo X300 Pro is cheaper by $300.

Detailed category analysis
performance

In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 Pro and the Apple iPhone 17 Pro Max are nearly equal (93/100 vs 92/100).

display

In the "display" category, the Apple iPhone 17 Pro Max and the Vivo X300 Pro are nearly equal (85/100 vs 84/100).

camera

In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Pro notably outperforms the Apple iPhone 17 Pro Max (96/100 vs 71/100).

battery

In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Pro notably outperforms the Apple iPhone 17 Pro Max (81/100 vs 53/100).

portability

In the "portability" category, the Vivo X300 Pro is a bit better (43/100 vs 30/100).

value for money

In the "value for money" category, the Vivo X300 Pro notably outperforms the Apple iPhone 17 Pro Max (86/100 vs 60/100).

Frequently asked questions
Which is better: the Apple iPhone 17 Pro Max or the Vivo X300 Pro?

The Vivo X300 Pro is noticeably better than the Apple iPhone 17 Pro Max — the overall rating gap is 12 points.

What is the rating of the Apple iPhone 17 Pro Max and the Vivo X300 Pro?

The Apple iPhone 17 Pro Max has a MobileRank rating of 75/100, the Vivo X300 Pro — 87/100.

Which has the better camera: the Apple iPhone 17 Pro Max or the Vivo X300 Pro?

The Vivo X300 Pro leads on camera score (96/100 vs 71/100).

Should you choose the Apple iPhone 17 Pro Max over the Vivo X300 Pro?

The Apple iPhone 17 Pro Max is a better fit for gamers and power users. The Vivo X300 Pro is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.