Apple iPhone 17 Pro Max vs Vivo iQOO 15

The Apple iPhone 17 Pro Max (2025) runs on the Apple A19 Pro, while the Vivo iQOO 15 (2025) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite; estimated prices are $1199 and $599. By overall MobileRank rating, the Vivo iQOO 15 leads — 86/100 vs 75/100 (a 11-point difference). Key differences: the Vivo iQOO 15 has the bigger battery (7000 mAh vs 4823); the main camera is 48 MP vs 50 MP; the Vivo iQOO 15 is faster in AnTuTu (3,740,528 vs 2,601,000); the Vivo iQOO 15 is noticeably lighter (215g vs 233g).

The Vivo iQOO 15 is noticeably better than the Apple iPhone 17 Pro Max — the overall rating gap is 11 points.
Profile comparison
Category scores
Apple iPhone 17 Pro Max
Performance 92
Display 85
Camera 71
Battery 53
Portability 30
Value for money 60
Vivo iQOO 15
Performance 94
Display 99
Camera 78
Battery 85
Portability 48
Value for money 84
What makes Apple iPhone 17 Pro Max better?
  • Better Geekbench Single: 3933 vs 3041
  • Better Geekbench Multi: 10223 vs 9494

  • Overall rating 75/100
What makes Vivo iQOO 15 better?
  • Higher AnTuTu: 3740528 vs 2601000
  • Bigger battery: 7000 vs 4823 mAh
  • Faster charging: 100W vs 40W
  • Better main camera: 50MP vs 48MP
  • Higher refresh rate: 144Hz vs 120Hz
  • Faster wireless charging: 40W vs 25W
  • Lighter: 215g vs 233g
  • Cheaper: $599 vs $1199

  • Higher performance (94/100 vs 92/100)
  • Better camera (78/100 vs 71/100)
  • Longer battery life (85/100 vs 53/100)
  • Better display (99/100 vs 85/100)
  • Better portability (48/100 vs 30/100)
  • Better value for money (84/100 vs 60/100)
Comparison verdict

Comparing the Apple iPhone 17 Pro Max vs the Vivo iQOO 15, the Vivo iQOO 15 scores 11 points higher (86/100 vs 75/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo iQOO 15 leads (85/100 vs 53/100). In the "value for money" category, the Vivo iQOO 15 leads (84/100 vs 60/100). In the "performance" category, the Vivo iQOO 15 and the Apple iPhone 17 Pro Max are nearly equal (94/100 vs 92/100). In the "display" category, the Vivo iQOO 15 is a bit better (99/100 vs 85/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo iQOO 15 is a bit better (78/100 vs 71/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo iQOO 15 significantly outperforms the Apple iPhone 17 Pro Max (85/100 vs 53/100). In the "portability" category, the Vivo iQOO 15 notably outperforms the Apple iPhone 17 Pro Max (48/100 vs 30/100). In the "value for money" category, the Vivo iQOO 15 notably outperforms the Apple iPhone 17 Pro Max (84/100 vs 60/100).

Apple iPhone 17 Pro Max: The Apple iPhone 17 Pro Max is a better fit for gamers and power users.
Vivo iQOO 15: The Vivo iQOO 15 is a better fit for gamers and power users, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.
Specs comparison
Specification Apple iPhone 17 Pro Max Vivo iQOO 15
Processor Apple A19 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite
AnTuTu 2601000 3740528
Geekbench Single 3933 3041
Geekbench Multi 10223 9494
Display 6.9" LTPO Super Retina XDR OLED 6.8" LTPO AMOLED
Resolution 2868x1320 1440x3168
Refresh rate 120 Hz 144 Hz
Battery 4823 mAh 7000 mAh
Charging 40W 100W
Wireless charging 25W 40W
Main camera 48 MP 50 MP
Ultrawide 48 MP 50 MP
Telephoto 48 MP 50 MP
Front camera 18 MP 32 MP
RAM 12GB 12GB / 16GB
Storage 256GB / 512GB / 1TB / 2TB 256GB / 512GB / 1TB
OS iOS 26 Android 16
Brightness (peak) 3000 nits 6000 nits
NFC yes yes
Protection IP68 IP68
Dimensions 163.4×78.0×8.8 mm 163.7×76.8×8.1 mm
Weight 233 g 215 g
Price $1199 $599
Camera comparison
Apple iPhone 17 Pro Max
  • Main: 48MP f/f/1.78
  • Ultrawide: 48MP
  • Telephoto: 48MP
  • Front: 18MP
71
camera
Vivo iQOO 15
  • Main: 50MP f/f/1.9
  • Ultrawide: 50MP
  • Telephoto: 50MP
  • Front: 32MP
78
camera
Display comparison
Apple iPhone 17 Pro Max
  • 6.9" LTPO Super Retina XDR OLED
  • Resolution: 2868x1320
  • Refresh rate: 120 Hz
85
display
Vivo iQOO 15
  • 6.8" LTPO AMOLED
  • Resolution: 1440x3168
  • Refresh rate: 144 Hz
99
display
Battery and charging
Apple iPhone 17 Pro Max
  • 4823 mAh
  • Wired: 40W
  • Wireless: 25W
53
battery
Vivo iQOO 15
  • 7000 mAh
  • NanoReview test: web browsing 18:52 hrs, total 39:26 hrs
  • Wired: 100W
  • Wireless: 40W
85
battery
Overall performance score

We compared Apple iPhone 17 Pro Max and Vivo iQOO 15, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.

Apple iPhone 17 Pro Max Apple A19 Pro
75/100
2601000 AnTuTu
Vivo iQOO 15 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite
86/100 +30.5%
3740528 AnTuTu

Vivo iQOO 15 leads Apple iPhone 17 Pro Max by 30.5% in our overall performance rating.

Benchmarks
Price and availability
Apple iPhone 17 Pro Max
$1199
Vivo iQOO 15
$599

Price difference: $600. Vivo iQOO 15 is cheaper by $600.

Detailed category analysis
performance

In the "performance" category, the Vivo iQOO 15 and the Apple iPhone 17 Pro Max are nearly equal (94/100 vs 92/100).

display

In the "display" category, the Vivo iQOO 15 is a bit better (99/100 vs 85/100).

camera

In the "camera" category, the Vivo iQOO 15 is a bit better (78/100 vs 71/100).

battery

In the "battery" category, the Vivo iQOO 15 significantly outperforms the Apple iPhone 17 Pro Max (85/100 vs 53/100).

portability

In the "portability" category, the Vivo iQOO 15 notably outperforms the Apple iPhone 17 Pro Max (48/100 vs 30/100).

value for money

In the "value for money" category, the Vivo iQOO 15 notably outperforms the Apple iPhone 17 Pro Max (84/100 vs 60/100).

Frequently asked questions
Which is better: the Apple iPhone 17 Pro Max or the Vivo iQOO 15?

The Vivo iQOO 15 is noticeably better than the Apple iPhone 17 Pro Max — the overall rating gap is 11 points.

What is the rating of the Apple iPhone 17 Pro Max and the Vivo iQOO 15?

The Apple iPhone 17 Pro Max has a MobileRank rating of 75/100, the Vivo iQOO 15 — 86/100.

Which has the better camera: the Apple iPhone 17 Pro Max or the Vivo iQOO 15?

The Vivo iQOO 15 leads on camera score (78/100 vs 71/100).

Should you choose the Apple iPhone 17 Pro Max over the Vivo iQOO 15?

The Apple iPhone 17 Pro Max is a better fit for gamers and power users. The Vivo iQOO 15 is a better fit for gamers and power users, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.