Apple iPhone 17 Pro vs Vivo iQOO 15

The Apple iPhone 17 Pro (2025) runs on the Apple A19 Pro, while the Vivo iQOO 15 (2025) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite; estimated prices are $1099 and $599. By overall MobileRank rating, the Vivo iQOO 15 leads — 86/100 vs 79/100 (a 7-point difference). Key differences: the Vivo iQOO 15 has the bigger battery (7000 mAh vs 3998); the main camera is 48 MP vs 50 MP; the Vivo iQOO 15 is faster in AnTuTu (3,740,528 vs 2,590,000).

The Vivo iQOO 15 edges out the Apple iPhone 17 Pro by just 7 points — the two devices are very close in overall level.
Profile comparison
Category scores
Apple iPhone 17 Pro
Performance 92
Display 85
Camera 94
Battery 37
Portability 47
Value for money 70
Vivo iQOO 15
Performance 94
Display 99
Camera 78
Battery 85
Portability 48
Value for money 84
What makes Apple iPhone 17 Pro better?
  • Better Geekbench Single: 3895 vs 3041
  • Better Geekbench Multi: 9988 vs 9494
  • Lighter: 206g vs 215g

  • Better camera (94/100 vs 78/100)
What makes Vivo iQOO 15 better?
  • Higher AnTuTu: 3740528 vs 2590000
  • Bigger battery: 7000 vs 3998 mAh
  • Faster charging: 100W vs 40W
  • Better main camera: 50MP vs 48MP
  • Higher refresh rate: 144Hz vs 120Hz
  • Faster wireless charging: 40W vs 25W
  • Cheaper: $599 vs $1099

  • Higher performance (94/100 vs 92/100)
  • Longer battery life (85/100 vs 37/100)
  • Better display (99/100 vs 85/100)
  • Better portability (48/100 vs 47/100)
  • Better value for money (84/100 vs 70/100)
Comparison verdict

Comparing the Apple iPhone 17 Pro vs the Vivo iQOO 15, the Vivo iQOO 15 scores 7 points higher (86/100 vs 79/100). In the "camera" category, the Apple iPhone 17 Pro leads (94/100 vs 78/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo iQOO 15 leads (85/100 vs 37/100). In the "value for money" category, the Vivo iQOO 15 leads (84/100 vs 70/100). In the "performance" category, the Vivo iQOO 15 and the Apple iPhone 17 Pro are nearly equal (94/100 vs 92/100). In the "display" category, the Vivo iQOO 15 is a bit better (99/100 vs 85/100). In the "camera" category, the Apple iPhone 17 Pro notably outperforms the Vivo iQOO 15 (94/100 vs 78/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo iQOO 15 significantly outperforms the Apple iPhone 17 Pro (85/100 vs 37/100). In the "portability" category, the Vivo iQOO 15 and the Apple iPhone 17 Pro are nearly equal (48/100 vs 47/100). In the "value for money" category, the Vivo iQOO 15 is a bit better (84/100 vs 70/100).

Apple iPhone 17 Pro: The Apple iPhone 17 Pro is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts.
Vivo iQOO 15: The Vivo iQOO 15 is a better fit for gamers and power users, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.
Specs comparison
Specification Apple iPhone 17 Pro Vivo iQOO 15
Processor Apple A19 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite
AnTuTu 2590000 3740528
Geekbench Single 3895 3041
Geekbench Multi 9988 9494
Display 6.3" LTPO Super Retina XDR OLED 6.8" LTPO AMOLED
Resolution 2622x1206 1440x3168
Refresh rate 120 Hz 144 Hz
Battery 3998 mAh 7000 mAh
Charging 40W 100W
Wireless charging 25W 40W
DXOMark (camera) 168
Main camera 48 MP 50 MP
Ultrawide 48 MP 50 MP
Telephoto 48 MP 50 MP
Front camera 18 MP 32 MP
RAM 12GB 12GB / 16GB
Storage 256GB / 512GB / 1TB 256GB / 512GB / 1TB
OS iOS 26 Android 16
Brightness (peak) 3000 nits 6000 nits
NFC yes yes
Protection IP68 IP68
Dimensions 150.0×71.9×8.8 mm 163.7×76.8×8.1 mm
Weight 206 g 215 g
Price $1099 $599
Camera comparison
Apple iPhone 17 Pro
  • Main: 48MP f/f/1.78
  • Ultrawide: 48MP
  • Telephoto: 48MP
  • Front: 18MP
94
camera
Vivo iQOO 15
  • Main: 50MP f/f/1.9
  • Ultrawide: 50MP
  • Telephoto: 50MP
  • Front: 32MP
78
camera
Display comparison
Apple iPhone 17 Pro
  • 6.3" LTPO Super Retina XDR OLED
  • Resolution: 2622x1206
  • Refresh rate: 120 Hz
85
display
Vivo iQOO 15
  • 6.8" LTPO AMOLED
  • Resolution: 1440x3168
  • Refresh rate: 144 Hz
99
display
Battery and charging
Apple iPhone 17 Pro
  • 3998 mAh
  • NanoReview test: web browsing 9:51 hrs, total 26:48 hrs
  • Wired: 40W
  • Wireless: 25W
37
battery
Vivo iQOO 15
  • 7000 mAh
  • NanoReview test: web browsing 18:52 hrs, total 39:26 hrs
  • Wired: 100W
  • Wireless: 40W
85
battery
Overall performance score

We compared Apple iPhone 17 Pro and Vivo iQOO 15, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.

Apple iPhone 17 Pro Apple A19 Pro
79/100
2590000 AnTuTu
Vivo iQOO 15 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite
86/100 +30.8%
3740528 AnTuTu

Vivo iQOO 15 leads Apple iPhone 17 Pro by 30.8% in our overall performance rating.

Benchmarks
Price and availability
Apple iPhone 17 Pro
$1099
Vivo iQOO 15
$599

Price difference: $500. Vivo iQOO 15 is cheaper by $500.

Detailed category analysis
performance

In the "performance" category, the Vivo iQOO 15 and the Apple iPhone 17 Pro are nearly equal (94/100 vs 92/100).

display

In the "display" category, the Vivo iQOO 15 is a bit better (99/100 vs 85/100).

camera

In the "camera" category, the Apple iPhone 17 Pro notably outperforms the Vivo iQOO 15 (94/100 vs 78/100).

battery

In the "battery" category, the Vivo iQOO 15 significantly outperforms the Apple iPhone 17 Pro (85/100 vs 37/100).

portability

In the "portability" category, the Vivo iQOO 15 and the Apple iPhone 17 Pro are nearly equal (48/100 vs 47/100).

value for money

In the "value for money" category, the Vivo iQOO 15 is a bit better (84/100 vs 70/100).

Frequently asked questions
Which is better: the Apple iPhone 17 Pro or the Vivo iQOO 15?

The Vivo iQOO 15 edges out the Apple iPhone 17 Pro by just 7 points — the two devices are very close in overall level.

What is the rating of the Apple iPhone 17 Pro and the Vivo iQOO 15?

The Apple iPhone 17 Pro has a MobileRank rating of 79/100, the Vivo iQOO 15 — 86/100.

Which has the better camera: the Apple iPhone 17 Pro or the Vivo iQOO 15?

The Apple iPhone 17 Pro leads on camera score (94/100 vs 78/100).

Should you choose the Apple iPhone 17 Pro over the Vivo iQOO 15?

The Apple iPhone 17 Pro is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts. The Vivo iQOO 15 is a better fit for gamers and power users, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.