Apple iPhone 17 Pro vs Vivo X300 Ultra
The Apple iPhone 17 Pro (2025) runs on the Apple A19 Pro, while the Vivo X300 Ultra (2026) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5; estimated prices are $1099 and $950. By overall MobileRank rating, the Vivo X300 Ultra leads — 87/100 vs 69/100 (a 18-point difference). Key differences: the Vivo X300 Ultra has the bigger battery (7000 mAh vs 3998); the main camera is 48 MP vs 200 MP; the Vivo X300 Ultra is faster in AnTuTu (4,247,433 vs 2,590,000); per DXOMark lab testing, the Vivo X300 Ultra has the stronger camera (170 vs 168); the Apple iPhone 17 Pro is noticeably lighter (206g vs 230g).
Apple iPhone 17 Pro
Vivo X300 Ultra
- Better Geekbench Single: 3895 vs 3640
- Lighter: 206g vs 230g
- Better design/ergonomics (42/100 vs 12/100)
- Higher AnTuTu: 4247433 vs 2590000
- Better Geekbench Multi: 11033 vs 9988
- Bigger battery: 7000 vs 3998 mAh
- Faster charging: 100W vs 40W
- Better main camera: 200MP vs 48MP
- Faster wireless charging: 40W vs 25W
- Cheaper: $950 vs $1099
- Higher performance (96/100 vs 71/100)
- Better camera (96/100 vs 94/100)
- Longer battery life (77/100 vs 21/100)
- Better value for money (44/100 vs 34/100)
Comparing the Apple iPhone 17 Pro vs the Vivo X300 Ultra, the Vivo X300 Ultra scores 18 points higher (87/100 vs 69/100). In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra leads (96/100 vs 71/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra leads (77/100 vs 21/100). In the "value for money" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra leads (44/100 vs 34/100). In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra notably outperforms the Apple iPhone 17 Pro (96/100 vs 71/100). In the "display" category, both devices are on the same level — 100/100. In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra and the Apple iPhone 17 Pro are nearly equal (96/100 vs 94/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Apple iPhone 17 Pro (77/100 vs 21/100). In the "design" category, the Apple iPhone 17 Pro significantly outperforms the Vivo X300 Ultra (42/100 vs 12/100). In the "value for money" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra is a bit better (44/100 vs 34/100).
| Specification | Apple iPhone 17 Pro | Vivo X300 Ultra | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | Apple A19 Pro | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 | |
| AnTuTu | 2590000 | 4247433 | |
| Geekbench Single | 3895 | 3640 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 9988 | 11033 | |
| Display | 6.3" LTPO Super Retina XDR OLED | 6.8" LTPO OLED | |
| Resolution | 2622x1206 | 3168x1440 | |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz | |
| Battery | 3998 mAh | 7000 mAh | |
| Charging | 40W | 100W | |
| Wireless charging | 25W | 40W | |
| DXOMark (camera) | 168 | 170 | |
| Main camera | 48 MP | 200 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 48 MP | 50 MP | |
| Telephoto | 48 MP | 200 MP | |
| Front camera | 18 MP | 32 MP | |
| RAM | 12GB | 12GB / 16GB | |
| Storage | 256GB / 512GB / 1TB | 256GB / 512GB / 1TB | |
| OS | iOS 26 | Android 16 | |
| Brightness (peak) | 3000 nits | — | |
| NFC | yes | yes | |
| Protection | IP68 | IP69 | |
| Dimensions | 150.0×71.9×8.8 mm | 163.0×76.8×8.2 mm | |
| Weight | 206 g | 230 g | |
| Price | $1099 | $950 |
Apple iPhone 17 Pro
- Main: 48MP f/f/1.78
- Ultrawide: 48MP
- Telephoto: 48MP
- Front: 18MP
Vivo X300 Ultra
- Main: 200MP f/f/1.6
- Ultrawide: 50MP
- Telephoto: 200MP
- Front: 32MP
Apple iPhone 17 Pro
- 6.3" LTPO Super Retina XDR OLED
- Resolution: 2622x1206
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Vivo X300 Ultra
- 6.8" LTPO OLED
- Resolution: 3168x1440
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Apple iPhone 17 Pro
- 3998 mAh
- NanoReview test: web browsing 9:51 hrs, total 26:48 hrs
- Wired: 40W
- Wireless: 25W
Vivo X300 Ultra
- 7000 mAh
- NanoReview test: web browsing 10:18 hrs, total 29:11 hrs
- Wired: 100W
- Wireless: 40W
We compared Apple iPhone 17 Pro and Vivo X300 Ultra, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Vivo X300 Ultra leads Apple iPhone 17 Pro by 39.0% in our overall performance rating.
Price difference: $149. Vivo X300 Ultra is cheaper by $149.
performance
In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra notably outperforms the Apple iPhone 17 Pro (96/100 vs 71/100).
display
In the "display" category, both devices are on the same level — 100/100.
camera
In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra and the Apple iPhone 17 Pro are nearly equal (96/100 vs 94/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Apple iPhone 17 Pro (77/100 vs 21/100).
design
In the "design" category, the Apple iPhone 17 Pro significantly outperforms the Vivo X300 Ultra (42/100 vs 12/100).
value for money
In the "value for money" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra is a bit better (44/100 vs 34/100).
Which is better: the Apple iPhone 17 Pro or the Vivo X300 Ultra?
The Vivo X300 Ultra is noticeably better than the Apple iPhone 17 Pro — the overall rating gap is 18 points.
What is the rating of the Apple iPhone 17 Pro and the Vivo X300 Ultra?
The Apple iPhone 17 Pro has a MobileRank rating of 69/100, the Vivo X300 Ultra — 87/100.
Which is more powerful: the Apple iPhone 17 Pro or the Vivo X300 Ultra?
The Vivo X300 Ultra leads on performance (96/100 vs 71/100).
Should you choose the Apple iPhone 17 Pro over the Vivo X300 Ultra?
The Apple iPhone 17 Pro is a better fit for active users, mobile photography enthusiasts. The Vivo X300 Ultra is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts, those who care about battery life.