Apple iPhone 17e vs Vivo X300 Ultra

The Apple iPhone 17e (2026) runs on the Apple A19, while the Vivo X300 Ultra (2026) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5; launch prices were $599 and $950. By overall MobileRank rating, the Vivo X300 Ultra leads — 91/100 vs 59/100 (a 32-point difference). Key differences: the Vivo X300 Ultra has the bigger battery (7000 mAh vs 3600); the main camera is 48 MP vs 200 MP; the Vivo X300 Ultra is faster in AnTuTu (4,247,433 vs 2,156,126); the Apple iPhone 17e is noticeably lighter (163g vs 230g).

The Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Apple iPhone 17e by 32 points (91/100 vs 59/100).

Profile comparison

Category scores

Apple iPhone 17e

Performance 89
Display 61
Camera 34
Battery 21
Portability 83
Value for money 32

Vivo X300 Ultra

Performance 99
Display 89
Camera 96
Battery 85
Portability 39
Value for money 94

What makes Apple iPhone 17e better?

  • Better Geekbench Single: 3692 vs 3639
  • Lighter: 163g vs 230g
  • Cheaper at launch: $599 vs $950

  • Better portability (83/100 vs 39/100)

What makes Vivo X300 Ultra better?

  • Higher AnTuTu: 4247433 vs 2156126
  • Better Geekbench Multi: 11047 vs 9454
  • Bigger battery: 7000 vs 3600 mAh
  • Faster charging: 100W vs 20W
  • Better main camera: 200MP vs 48MP
  • Higher refresh rate: 120Hz vs 60Hz
  • Faster wireless charging: 40W vs 15W

  • Higher performance (99/100 vs 89/100)
  • Better camera (96/100 vs 34/100)
  • Longer battery life (85/100 vs 21/100)
  • Better display (89/100 vs 61/100)

Comparison verdict

Comparing the Apple iPhone 17e vs the Vivo X300 Ultra, the Vivo X300 Ultra scores 32 points higher (91/100 vs 59/100). In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra leads (99/100 vs 89/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra leads (96/100 vs 34/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra leads (85/100 vs 21/100). Value score: Apple iPhone 17e — 32/100, Vivo X300 Ultra — 94/100; it shows how far a model sits above or below the usual level for its price, and is not part of the overall rating. In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra is a bit better (99/100 vs 89/100). In the "display" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra notably outperforms the Apple iPhone 17e (89/100 vs 61/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Apple iPhone 17e (96/100 vs 34/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Apple iPhone 17e (85/100 vs 21/100). In the "portability" category, the Apple iPhone 17e significantly outperforms the Vivo X300 Ultra (83/100 vs 39/100).

Apple iPhone 17e: The Apple iPhone 17e is a better fit for gamers and power users.
Vivo X300 Ultra: The Vivo X300 Ultra is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.

Specs comparison

Specification Apple iPhone 17e Vivo X300 Ultra
Processor Apple A19 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5
AnTuTu 2156126 4247433
Geekbench Single 3692 3639
Geekbench Multi 9454 11047
Display 6.1" OLED 6.8" LTPO OLED
Resolution 2556x1179 3168x1440
Refresh rate 60 Hz 120 Hz
Battery 3600 mAh 7000 mAh
Charging 20W 100W
Wireless charging 15W 40W
DXOMark (camera) — 170
Main camera 48 MP 200 MP
Ultrawide 0 MP 50 MP
Telephoto 0 MP 200 MP
Front camera 24 MP 32 MP
RAM 8GB 12GB / 16GB
Storage 128GB / 256GB / 512GB 256GB / 512GB / 1TB
OS iOS 19 Android 16
Brightness (peak) 1200 nits —
NFC yes yes
Protection IP68 IP69
Dimensions 146.7×71.5×7.8 mm 163.0×76.8×8.2 mm
Weight 163 g 230 g
Launch price $599 $950

Camera comparison

Apple iPhone 17e

  • Main: 48MP f/1.6
  • Front: 24MP
34
camera

Vivo X300 Ultra

  • Main: 200MP f/1.6
  • Ultrawide: 50MP
  • Telephoto: 200MP
  • Front: 32MP
96
camera

Display comparison

Apple iPhone 17e

  • 6.1" OLED
  • Resolution: 2556x1179
  • Refresh rate: 60 Hz
61
display

Vivo X300 Ultra

  • 6.8" LTPO OLED
  • Resolution: 3168x1440
  • Refresh rate: 120 Hz
89
display

Battery and charging

Apple iPhone 17e

  • 3600 mAh
  • Wired: 20W
  • Wireless: 15W
21
battery

Vivo X300 Ultra

  • 7000 mAh
  • NanoReview test: web browsing 10:18 hrs, total 29:11 hrs
  • Wired: 100W
  • Wireless: 40W
85
battery

Overall performance score

We compared Apple iPhone 17e and Vivo X300 Ultra, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.

Apple iPhone 17e Apple A19
59/100
2156126 AnTuTu
Vivo X300 Ultra Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5
91/100 +49.2%
4247433 AnTuTu

Vivo X300 Ultra leads Apple iPhone 17e by 49.2% in our overall performance rating.

Benchmarks

Launch prices and where to check today's

Apple iPhone 17e

$599

Vivo X300 Ultra

$950

Launch price difference: $351. Apple iPhone 17e was $351 cheaper at launch.

Detailed category analysis

performance

In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra is a bit better (99/100 vs 89/100).

display

In the "display" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra notably outperforms the Apple iPhone 17e (89/100 vs 61/100).

camera

In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Apple iPhone 17e (96/100 vs 34/100).

battery

In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Apple iPhone 17e (85/100 vs 21/100).

portability

In the "portability" category, the Apple iPhone 17e significantly outperforms the Vivo X300 Ultra (83/100 vs 39/100).

Frequently asked questions

Which is better: the Apple iPhone 17e or the Vivo X300 Ultra?

The Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Apple iPhone 17e by 32 points (91/100 vs 59/100).

What is the rating of the Apple iPhone 17e and the Vivo X300 Ultra?

The Apple iPhone 17e has a MobileRank rating of 59/100, the Vivo X300 Ultra — 91/100.

Which has the better camera: the Apple iPhone 17e or the Vivo X300 Ultra?

The Vivo X300 Ultra leads on camera score (96/100 vs 34/100).

Which is more powerful: the Apple iPhone 17e or the Vivo X300 Ultra?

The Vivo X300 Ultra leads on performance (99/100 vs 89/100).

Should you choose the Apple iPhone 17e over the Vivo X300 Ultra?

The Apple iPhone 17e is a better fit for gamers and power users. The Vivo X300 Ultra is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.