Apple iPhone Air vs Vivo X300 Pro

The Apple iPhone Air (2025) runs on the Apple A19 Pro, while the Vivo X300 Pro (2025) runs on the Dimensity 9500; estimated prices are $999 and $899. By overall MobileRank rating, the Vivo X300 Pro leads — 87/100 vs 75/100 (a 12-point difference). Key differences: the Vivo X300 Pro has the bigger battery (6510 mAh vs 3149); the main camera is 48 MP vs 200 MP; the Vivo X300 Pro is faster in AnTuTu (3,269,794 vs 2,550,000); per DXOMark lab testing, the Vivo X300 Pro has the stronger camera (171 vs 141); the Apple iPhone Air is noticeably lighter (165g vs 226g).

The Vivo X300 Pro is noticeably better than the Apple iPhone Air — the overall rating gap is 12 points.
Profile comparison
Category scores
Apple iPhone Air
Performance 92
Display 85
Camera 73
Battery 26
Portability 94
Value for money 62
Vivo X300 Pro
Performance 93
Display 84
Camera 96
Battery 81
Portability 43
Value for money 86
What makes Apple iPhone Air better?
  • Better Geekbench Single: 3850 vs 3228
  • Better Geekbench Multi: 9800 vs 9553
  • Lighter: 165g vs 226g

  • Better display (85/100 vs 84/100)
  • Better portability (94/100 vs 43/100)
What makes Vivo X300 Pro better?
  • Higher AnTuTu: 3269794 vs 2550000
  • Bigger battery: 6510 vs 3149 mAh
  • Faster charging: 90W vs 40W
  • Better main camera: 200MP vs 48MP
  • Faster wireless charging: 40W vs 25W
  • Cheaper: $899 vs $999

  • Higher performance (93/100 vs 92/100)
  • Better camera (96/100 vs 73/100)
  • Longer battery life (81/100 vs 26/100)
  • Better value for money (86/100 vs 62/100)
Comparison verdict

Comparing the Apple iPhone Air vs the Vivo X300 Pro, the Vivo X300 Pro scores 12 points higher (87/100 vs 75/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Pro leads (96/100 vs 73/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Pro leads (81/100 vs 26/100). In the "value for money" category, the Vivo X300 Pro leads (86/100 vs 62/100). In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 Pro and the Apple iPhone Air are nearly equal (93/100 vs 92/100). In the "display" category, the Apple iPhone Air and the Vivo X300 Pro are nearly equal (85/100 vs 84/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Pro notably outperforms the Apple iPhone Air (96/100 vs 73/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Pro significantly outperforms the Apple iPhone Air (81/100 vs 26/100). In the "portability" category, the Apple iPhone Air significantly outperforms the Vivo X300 Pro (94/100 vs 43/100). In the "value for money" category, the Vivo X300 Pro notably outperforms the Apple iPhone Air (86/100 vs 62/100).

Apple iPhone Air: The Apple iPhone Air is a better fit for gamers and power users.
Vivo X300 Pro: The Vivo X300 Pro is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.
Specs comparison
Specification Apple iPhone Air Vivo X300 Pro
Processor Apple A19 Pro Dimensity 9500
AnTuTu 2550000 3269794
Geekbench Single 3850 3228
Geekbench Multi 9800 9553
Display 6.5" LTPO Super Retina XDR OLED 6.8" AMOLED
Resolution 2736x1260 1260x2800
Refresh rate 120 Hz 120 Hz
Battery 3149 mAh 6510 mAh
Charging 40W 90W
Wireless charging 25W 40W
DXOMark (camera) 141 171
Main camera 48 MP 200 MP
Ultrawide 0 MP 50 MP
Telephoto 0 MP 50 MP
Front camera 12 MP 32 MP
RAM 12GB 12GB / 16GB
Storage 256GB / 512GB / 1TB 256GB / 512GB / 1TB
OS iOS 26 Android 16
Brightness (peak) 4500 nits
NFC yes yes
Protection IP68 IP68
Dimensions 6.0×None×None mm 161.2×75.5×8.0 mm
Weight 165 g 226 g
Price $999 $899
Camera comparison
Apple iPhone Air
  • Main: 48MP f/f/1.6
  • Front: 12MP
73
camera
Vivo X300 Pro
  • Main: 200MP f/f/1.57
  • Ultrawide: 50MP
  • Telephoto: 50MP
  • Front: 32MP
96
camera
Display comparison
Apple iPhone Air
  • 6.5" LTPO Super Retina XDR OLED
  • Resolution: 2736x1260
  • Refresh rate: 120 Hz
85
display
Vivo X300 Pro
  • 6.8" AMOLED
  • Resolution: 1260x2800
  • Refresh rate: 120 Hz
84
display
Battery and charging
Apple iPhone Air
  • 3149 mAh
  • NanoReview test: web browsing 7:48 hrs, total 22:15 hrs
  • Wired: 40W
  • Wireless: 25W
26
battery
Vivo X300 Pro
  • 6510 mAh
  • NanoReview test: web browsing 13:30 hrs, total 24:37 hrs
  • Wired: 90W
  • Wireless: 40W
81
battery
Overall performance score

We compared Apple iPhone Air and Vivo X300 Pro, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.

Apple iPhone Air Apple A19 Pro
75/100
2550000 AnTuTu
Vivo X300 Pro Dimensity 9500
87/100 +22.0%
3269794 AnTuTu

Vivo X300 Pro leads Apple iPhone Air by 22.0% in our overall performance rating.

Benchmarks
Price and availability
Apple iPhone Air
$999
Vivo X300 Pro
$899

Price difference: $100. Vivo X300 Pro is cheaper by $100.

Detailed category analysis
performance

In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 Pro and the Apple iPhone Air are nearly equal (93/100 vs 92/100).

display

In the "display" category, the Apple iPhone Air and the Vivo X300 Pro are nearly equal (85/100 vs 84/100).

camera

In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Pro notably outperforms the Apple iPhone Air (96/100 vs 73/100).

battery

In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Pro significantly outperforms the Apple iPhone Air (81/100 vs 26/100).

portability

In the "portability" category, the Apple iPhone Air significantly outperforms the Vivo X300 Pro (94/100 vs 43/100).

value for money

In the "value for money" category, the Vivo X300 Pro notably outperforms the Apple iPhone Air (86/100 vs 62/100).

Frequently asked questions
Which is better: the Apple iPhone Air or the Vivo X300 Pro?

The Vivo X300 Pro is noticeably better than the Apple iPhone Air — the overall rating gap is 12 points.

What is the rating of the Apple iPhone Air and the Vivo X300 Pro?

The Apple iPhone Air has a MobileRank rating of 75/100, the Vivo X300 Pro — 87/100.

Which has the better camera: the Apple iPhone Air or the Vivo X300 Pro?

The Vivo X300 Pro leads on camera score (96/100 vs 73/100).

Should you choose the Apple iPhone Air over the Vivo X300 Pro?

The Apple iPhone Air is a better fit for gamers and power users. The Vivo X300 Pro is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.