Apple iPhone Fold vs Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold
The Apple iPhone Fold (2026) runs on the Apple A19 Pro, while the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold (2025) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite. By overall MobileRank rating, the Apple iPhone Fold leads — 77/100 vs 69/100 (a 8-point difference). Key differences: the main camera is 48 MP vs 200 MP; the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold is faster in AnTuTu (2,926,532 vs 2,568,709).
Apple iPhone Fold
Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold
- Better Geekbench Single: 3970 vs 3041
- Better Geekbench Multi: 10558 vs 9494
- Higher performance (92/100 vs 91/100)
- Better camera (53/100 vs 52/100)
- Better display (82/100 vs 70/100)
- Higher AnTuTu: 2926532 vs 2568709
- Better main camera: 200MP vs 48MP
- Overall rating 69/100
Comparing the Apple iPhone Fold vs the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold, the Apple iPhone Fold scores 8 points higher (77/100 vs 69/100). In the "performance" category, the Apple iPhone Fold and the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold are nearly equal (92/100 vs 91/100). In the "display" category, the Apple iPhone Fold is a bit better (82/100 vs 70/100). In the "camera" category, the Apple iPhone Fold and the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold are nearly equal (53/100 vs 52/100).
| Specification | Apple iPhone Fold | Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | Apple A19 Pro | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite | |
| AnTuTu | 2568709 | 2926532 | |
| Geekbench Single | 3970 | 3041 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 10558 | 9494 | |
| Display | 7.8" Foldable LTPO OLED | 10.0" Dynamic AMOLED 2X | |
| Resolution | 1920x2713 | 2160x1584 | |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz | |
| Battery | — | 5600 mAh | |
| Charging | — | 45W | |
| Wireless charging | — | 15W | |
| Main camera | 48 MP | 200 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 48 MP | 12 MP | |
| Telephoto | 12 MP | 10 MP | |
| Front camera | 4 MP | 10 MP | |
| RAM | 12GB | 16GB | |
| Storage | 256GB / 512GB / 1TB | 512GB | |
| OS | iOS 19 | Android 16 / One UI 8 | |
| Brightness (peak) | — | 2600 nits | |
| NFC | yes | yes | |
| Protection | — | IP48 | |
| Dimensions | — | 159.2×75.0×12.9 mm | |
| Weight | — | 309 g | |
| Price | — | $2899 |
Apple iPhone Fold
- Main: 48MP f/f/1.8
- Ultrawide: 48MP
- Telephoto: 12MP
- Front: 4MP
Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold
- Main: 200MP f/f/1.7
- Ultrawide: 12MP
- Telephoto: 10MP
- Front: 10MP
Apple iPhone Fold
- 7.8" Foldable LTPO OLED
- Resolution: 1920x2713
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold
- 10.0" Dynamic AMOLED 2X
- Resolution: 2160x1584
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Apple iPhone Fold
- —
- Wireless charging: no data
Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold
- 5600 mAh
- Wired: 45W
- Wireless: 15W
We compared Apple iPhone Fold and Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold leads Apple iPhone Fold by 12.2% in our overall performance rating.
Apple iPhone Fold
Price unknownperformance
In the "performance" category, the Apple iPhone Fold and the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold are nearly equal (92/100 vs 91/100).
display
In the "display" category, the Apple iPhone Fold is a bit better (82/100 vs 70/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the Apple iPhone Fold and the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold are nearly equal (53/100 vs 52/100).
Which is better: the Apple iPhone Fold or the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold?
The Apple iPhone Fold edges out the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold by just 8 points — the two devices are very close in overall level.
What is the rating of the Apple iPhone Fold and the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold?
The Apple iPhone Fold has a MobileRank rating of 77/100, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold — 69/100.
Should you choose the Apple iPhone Fold over the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold?
The Apple iPhone Fold is a better fit for gamers and power users. The Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold is a better fit for gamers and power users.