Apple iPhone Fold vs Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold
The Apple iPhone Fold (2026) runs on the Apple A19 Pro, while the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold (2025) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite. By overall MobileRank rating, the Apple iPhone Fold leads — 77/100 vs 69/100 (a 8-point difference). Key differences: the main camera is 48 MP vs 200 MP; the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold is faster in AnTuTu (2,926,532 vs 2,538,751).
Profile comparison
Category scores
Apple iPhone Fold
Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold
What makes Apple iPhone Fold better?
- Better Geekbench Single: 3970 vs 3013
- Better Geekbench Multi: 10558 vs 9287
- Higher performance (92/100 vs 90/100)
- Better camera (53/100 vs 52/100)
- Better display (82/100 vs 70/100)
What makes Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold better?
- Higher AnTuTu: 2926532 vs 2538751
- Better main camera: 200MP vs 48MP
- Overall rating 69/100
Comparison verdict
Comparing the Apple iPhone Fold vs the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold, the Apple iPhone Fold scores 8 points higher (77/100 vs 69/100). In the "performance" category, the Apple iPhone Fold and the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold are nearly equal (92/100 vs 90/100). In the "display" category, the Apple iPhone Fold is a bit better (82/100 vs 70/100). In the "camera" category, the Apple iPhone Fold and the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold are nearly equal (53/100 vs 52/100).
Specs comparison
| Specification | Apple iPhone Fold | Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | Apple A19 Pro | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite | |
| AnTuTu | 2538751 | 2926532 | |
| Geekbench Single | 3970 | 3013 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 10558 | 9287 | |
| Display | 7.8" Foldable LTPO OLED | 10.0" Dynamic AMOLED 2X | |
| Resolution | 1920x2713 | 2160x1584 | |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz | |
| Battery | — | 5600 mAh | |
| Charging | — | 45W | |
| Wireless charging | — | 15W | |
| Main camera | 48 MP | 200 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 48 MP | 12 MP | |
| Telephoto | 12 MP | 10 MP | |
| Front camera | 4 MP | 10 MP | |
| RAM | 12GB | 16GB | |
| Storage | 256GB / 512GB / 1TB | 512GB | |
| OS | iOS 19 | Android 16 / One UI 8 | |
| Brightness (peak) | — | 2600 nits | |
| NFC | yes | yes | |
| Protection | — | IP48 | |
| Dimensions | — | 159.2×75.0×12.9 mm | |
| Weight | — | 309 g | |
| Launch price | — | $2899 |
Camera comparison
Apple iPhone Fold
- Main: 48MP f/1.8
- Ultrawide: 48MP
- Telephoto: 12MP
- Front: 4MP
Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold
- Main: 200MP f/1.7
- Ultrawide: 12MP
- Telephoto: 10MP
- Front: 10MP
Display comparison
Apple iPhone Fold
- 7.8" Foldable LTPO OLED
- Resolution: 1920x2713
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold
- 10.0" Dynamic AMOLED 2X
- Resolution: 2160x1584
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Battery and charging
Apple iPhone Fold
- —
- Wireless charging: no data
Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold
- 5600 mAh
- Wired: 45W
- Wireless: 15W
Overall performance score
We compared Apple iPhone Fold and Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold leads Apple iPhone Fold by 13.3% in our overall performance rating.
Benchmarks
Launch prices and where to check today's
Apple iPhone Fold
Price unknownDetailed category analysis
performance
In the "performance" category, the Apple iPhone Fold and the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold are nearly equal (92/100 vs 90/100).
display
In the "display" category, the Apple iPhone Fold is a bit better (82/100 vs 70/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the Apple iPhone Fold and the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold are nearly equal (53/100 vs 52/100).
Frequently asked questions
Which is better: the Apple iPhone Fold or the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold?
The Apple iPhone Fold edges out the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold by just 8 points — the two devices are very close in overall level.
What is the rating of the Apple iPhone Fold and the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold?
The Apple iPhone Fold has a MobileRank rating of 77/100, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold — 69/100.
Should you choose the Apple iPhone Fold over the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold?
The Apple iPhone Fold is a better fit for gamers and power users. The Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold is a better fit for gamers and power users.