Apple iPhone Fold vs Samsung Galaxy S26+
The Apple iPhone Fold (2026) runs on the Apple A19 Pro, while the Samsung Galaxy S26+ (2026) runs on the Samsung Exynos 2600. By overall MobileRank rating, the Apple iPhone Fold leads — 77/100 vs 70/100 (a 7-point difference). Key differences: the main camera is 48 MP vs 50 MP; the Samsung Galaxy S26+ is faster in AnTuTu (3,161,830 vs 2,568,709).
Apple iPhone Fold
Samsung Galaxy S26+
- Better Geekbench Single: 3970 vs 2900
- Better Geekbench Multi: 10558 vs 9200
- Higher performance (92/100 vs 91/100)
- Better camera (53/100 vs 40/100)
- Higher AnTuTu: 3161830 vs 2568709
- Better main camera: 50MP vs 48MP
- Better display (89/100 vs 82/100)
Comparing the Apple iPhone Fold vs the Samsung Galaxy S26+, the Apple iPhone Fold scores 7 points higher (77/100 vs 70/100). In the "camera" category, the Apple iPhone Fold leads (53/100 vs 40/100). In the "performance" category, the Apple iPhone Fold and the Samsung Galaxy S26+ are nearly equal (92/100 vs 91/100). In the "display" category, the Samsung Galaxy S26+ is a bit better (89/100 vs 82/100). In the "camera" category, the Apple iPhone Fold is a bit better (53/100 vs 40/100).
| Specification | Apple iPhone Fold | Samsung Galaxy S26+ | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | Apple A19 Pro | Samsung Exynos 2600 | |
| AnTuTu | 2568709 | 3161830 | |
| Geekbench Single | 3970 | 2900 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 10558 | 9200 | |
| Display | 7.8" Foldable LTPO OLED | 6.7" Dynamic AMOLED 2X | |
| Resolution | 1920x2713 | 3120x1440 | |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz | |
| Battery | — | 4900 mAh | |
| Charging | — | 45W | |
| Wireless charging | — | 15W | |
| Main camera | 48 MP | 50 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 48 MP | 12 MP | |
| Telephoto | 12 MP | 10 MP | |
| Front camera | 4 MP | 12 MP | |
| RAM | 12GB | 12GB | |
| Storage | 256GB / 512GB / 1TB | 256GB / 512GB | |
| OS | iOS 19 | Android 16 / One UI 8.5 | |
| Brightness (peak) | — | 2600 nits | |
| NFC | yes | yes | |
| Protection | — | IP68 | |
| Dimensions | — | 158.4×75.8×7.3 mm | |
| Weight | — | 190 g | |
| Launch price | — | $999 |
Apple iPhone Fold
- Main: 48MP f/f/1.8
- Ultrawide: 48MP
- Telephoto: 12MP
- Front: 4MP
Samsung Galaxy S26+
- Main: 50MP f/f/1.8
- Ultrawide: 12MP
- Telephoto: 10MP
- Front: 12MP
Apple iPhone Fold
- 7.8" Foldable LTPO OLED
- Resolution: 1920x2713
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Samsung Galaxy S26+
- 6.7" Dynamic AMOLED 2X
- Resolution: 3120x1440
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Apple iPhone Fold
- —
- Wireless charging: no data
Samsung Galaxy S26+
- 4900 mAh
- Wired: 45W
- Wireless: 15W
We compared Apple iPhone Fold and Samsung Galaxy S26+, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Samsung Galaxy S26+ leads Apple iPhone Fold by 18.8% in our overall performance rating.
Apple iPhone Fold
Price unknownperformance
In the "performance" category, the Apple iPhone Fold and the Samsung Galaxy S26+ are nearly equal (92/100 vs 91/100).
display
In the "display" category, the Samsung Galaxy S26+ is a bit better (89/100 vs 82/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the Apple iPhone Fold is a bit better (53/100 vs 40/100).
Which is better: the Apple iPhone Fold or the Samsung Galaxy S26+?
The Apple iPhone Fold edges out the Samsung Galaxy S26+ by just 7 points — the two devices are very close in overall level.
What is the rating of the Apple iPhone Fold and the Samsung Galaxy S26+?
The Apple iPhone Fold has a MobileRank rating of 77/100, the Samsung Galaxy S26+ — 70/100.
Which has the better camera: the Apple iPhone Fold or the Samsung Galaxy S26+?
The Apple iPhone Fold leads on camera score (53/100 vs 40/100).
Should you choose the Apple iPhone Fold over the Samsung Galaxy S26+?
The Apple iPhone Fold is a better fit for gamers and power users. The Samsung Galaxy S26+ is a better fit for gamers and power users.