Apple iPhone Air vs Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold
The Apple iPhone Air (2025) runs on the Apple A19 Pro, while the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold (2025) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite; estimated prices are $999 and $2899. By overall MobileRank rating, the Apple iPhone Air leads — 75/100 vs 69/100 (a 6-point difference). Key differences: the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold has the bigger battery (5600 mAh vs 3149); the main camera is 48 MP vs 200 MP; the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold is faster in AnTuTu (2,926,532 vs 2,550,000); the Apple iPhone Air is noticeably lighter (165g vs 309g).
Apple iPhone Air
Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold
- Better Geekbench Single: 3850 vs 3041
- Better Geekbench Multi: 9800 vs 9494
- Faster wireless charging: 25W vs 15W
- Lighter: 165g vs 309g
- Cheaper: $999 vs $2899
- Higher performance (92/100 vs 91/100)
- Better camera (73/100 vs 52/100)
- Better display (85/100 vs 70/100)
- Better portability (94/100 vs 20/100)
- Better value for money (62/100 vs 42/100)
- Higher AnTuTu: 2926532 vs 2550000
- Bigger battery: 5600 vs 3149 mAh
- Faster charging: 45W vs 40W
- Better main camera: 200MP vs 48MP
- Longer battery life (63/100 vs 26/100)
Comparing the Apple iPhone Air vs the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold, the Apple iPhone Air scores 6 points higher (75/100 vs 69/100). In the "camera" category, the Apple iPhone Air leads (73/100 vs 52/100). In the "battery" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold leads (63/100 vs 26/100). In the "value for money" category, the Apple iPhone Air leads (62/100 vs 42/100). In the "performance" category, the Apple iPhone Air and the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold are nearly equal (92/100 vs 91/100). In the "display" category, the Apple iPhone Air notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold (85/100 vs 70/100). In the "camera" category, the Apple iPhone Air notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold (73/100 vs 52/100). In the "battery" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold significantly outperforms the Apple iPhone Air (63/100 vs 26/100). In the "portability" category, the Apple iPhone Air significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold (94/100 vs 20/100). In the "value for money" category, the Apple iPhone Air notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold (62/100 vs 42/100).
| Specification | Apple iPhone Air | Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | Apple A19 Pro | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite | |
| AnTuTu | 2550000 | 2926532 | |
| Geekbench Single | 3850 | 3041 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 9800 | 9494 | |
| Display | 6.5" LTPO Super Retina XDR OLED | 10.0" Dynamic AMOLED 2X | |
| Resolution | 2736x1260 | 2160x1584 | |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz | |
| Battery | 3149 mAh | 5600 mAh | |
| Charging | 40W | 45W | |
| Wireless charging | 25W | 15W | |
| DXOMark (camera) | 141 | — | |
| Main camera | 48 MP | 200 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 0 MP | 12 MP | |
| Telephoto | 0 MP | 10 MP | |
| Front camera | 12 MP | 10 MP | |
| RAM | 12GB | 16GB | |
| Storage | 256GB / 512GB / 1TB | 512GB | |
| OS | iOS 26 | Android 16 / One UI 8 | |
| Brightness (peak) | — | 2600 nits | |
| NFC | yes | yes | |
| Protection | IP68 | IP48 | |
| Dimensions | 6.0×None×None mm | 159.2×75.0×12.9 mm | |
| Weight | 165 g | 309 g | |
| Price | $999 | $2899 |
Apple iPhone Air
- Main: 48MP f/f/1.6
- Front: 12MP
Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold
- Main: 200MP f/f/1.7
- Ultrawide: 12MP
- Telephoto: 10MP
- Front: 10MP
Apple iPhone Air
- 6.5" LTPO Super Retina XDR OLED
- Resolution: 2736x1260
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold
- 10.0" Dynamic AMOLED 2X
- Resolution: 2160x1584
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Apple iPhone Air
- 3149 mAh
- NanoReview test: web browsing 7:48 hrs, total 22:15 hrs
- Wired: 40W
- Wireless: 25W
Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold
- 5600 mAh
- Wired: 45W
- Wireless: 15W
We compared Apple iPhone Air and Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold leads Apple iPhone Air by 12.9% in our overall performance rating.
Price difference: $1900. Apple iPhone Air is cheaper by $1900.
performance
In the "performance" category, the Apple iPhone Air and the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold are nearly equal (92/100 vs 91/100).
display
In the "display" category, the Apple iPhone Air notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold (85/100 vs 70/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the Apple iPhone Air notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold (73/100 vs 52/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold significantly outperforms the Apple iPhone Air (63/100 vs 26/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, the Apple iPhone Air significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold (94/100 vs 20/100).
value for money
In the "value for money" category, the Apple iPhone Air notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold (62/100 vs 42/100).
Which is better: the Apple iPhone Air or the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold?
The Apple iPhone Air edges out the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold by just 6 points — the two devices are very close in overall level.
What is the rating of the Apple iPhone Air and the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold?
The Apple iPhone Air has a MobileRank rating of 75/100, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold — 69/100.
Which has the better camera: the Apple iPhone Air or the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold?
The Apple iPhone Air leads on camera score (73/100 vs 52/100).
Should you choose the Apple iPhone Air over the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold?
The Apple iPhone Air is a better fit for gamers and power users. The Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold is a better fit for gamers and power users.