Vivo Y77 (China) vs ZTE Axon 40 SE
The Vivo Y77 (China) (2022) runs on the MediaTek Dimensity 930, while the ZTE Axon 40 SE (2022) runs on the Unisoc UMS512T T618. By overall MobileRank rating, the Vivo Y77 (China) leads — 29/100 vs 15/100 (a 14-point difference). Key differences: the ZTE Axon 40 SE has NFC for contactless payments, the Vivo Y77 (China) doesn't; the ZTE Axon 40 SE is thinner (7.6mm vs 8.6mm).
Vivo Y77 (China)
ZTE Axon 40 SE
- Faster charging: 80W vs 5W
- Longer battery life (39/100 vs 24/100)
- Better display (100/100 vs 0/100)
- Lighter: 182g vs 194g
- Better design/ergonomics (72/100 vs 57/100)
Comparing the Vivo Y77 (China) vs the ZTE Axon 40 SE, the Vivo Y77 (China) scores 14 points higher (29/100 vs 15/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo Y77 (China) leads (39/100 vs 24/100). In the "performance" category, both devices are on the same level — 0/100. In the "display" category, the Vivo Y77 (China) significantly outperforms the ZTE Axon 40 SE (100/100 vs 0/100). In the "camera" category, both devices are on the same level — 24/100. In the "battery" category, the Vivo Y77 (China) notably outperforms the ZTE Axon 40 SE (39/100 vs 24/100). In the "design" category, the ZTE Axon 40 SE notably outperforms the Vivo Y77 (China) (72/100 vs 57/100). In the "value for money" category, both devices are on the same level — 55/100.
| Specification | Vivo Y77 (China) | ZTE Axon 40 SE | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | MediaTek Dimensity 930 | Unisoc UMS512T T618 | |
| AnTuTu | — | — | |
| Geekbench Single | — | — | |
| Geekbench Multi | — | — | |
| Display | 6.6" IPS LCD | 6.7" AMOLED | |
| Resolution | 1080x2388 | 1080x2400 | |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | — | |
| Battery | 4500 mAh | 4500 mAh | |
| Charging | 80W | 5W | |
| Main camera | 50 MP | 50 MP | |
| Front camera | 8 MP | 8 MP | |
| RAM | 6GB / 8GB / 12GB | 4GB | |
| Storage | 128GB / 256GB | 128GB | |
| OS | Android 12, Origin OS Ocean | Android 12, MyOS 12 | |
| NFC | no | yes | |
| Dimensions | 164.2×75.8×8.6 mm | 163.5×75.8×7.6 mm | |
| Weight | 194 g | 182 g | |
| Price | — | — |
Vivo Y77 (China)
- Main: 50MP f/f/1.8
- Front: 8MP
ZTE Axon 40 SE
- Main: 50MP f/f/1.8
- Front: 8MP
Vivo Y77 (China)
- 6.6" IPS LCD
- Resolution: 1080x2388
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
ZTE Axon 40 SE
- 6.7" AMOLED
- Resolution: 1080x2400
- Refresh rate: —
Vivo Y77 (China)
- 4500 mAh
- Wired: 80W
- No wireless charging
ZTE Axon 40 SE
- 4500 mAh
- Wired: 5W
- No wireless charging
performance
In the "performance" category, both devices are on the same level — 0/100.
display
In the "display" category, the Vivo Y77 (China) significantly outperforms the ZTE Axon 40 SE (100/100 vs 0/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, both devices are on the same level — 24/100.
battery
In the "battery" category, the Vivo Y77 (China) notably outperforms the ZTE Axon 40 SE (39/100 vs 24/100).
design
In the "design" category, the ZTE Axon 40 SE notably outperforms the Vivo Y77 (China) (72/100 vs 57/100).
value for money
In the "value for money" category, both devices are on the same level — 55/100.
Which is better: the Vivo Y77 (China) or the ZTE Axon 40 SE?
The Vivo Y77 (China) is noticeably better than the ZTE Axon 40 SE — the overall rating gap is 14 points.
What is the rating of the Vivo Y77 (China) and the ZTE Axon 40 SE?
The Vivo Y77 (China) has a MobileRank rating of 29/100, the ZTE Axon 40 SE — 15/100.
Should you choose the Vivo Y77 (China) over the ZTE Axon 40 SE?
The Vivo Y77 (China) is a better fit for everyday use. The ZTE Axon 40 SE is a better fit for everyday use.