Vivo Y32t vs ZTE Axon 40 SE
The Vivo Y32t (2022) runs on the MediaTek Helio P70 (), while the ZTE Axon 40 SE (2022) runs on the Unisoc UMS512T T618. By overall MobileRank rating, the ZTE Axon 40 SE leads — 15/100 vs 11/100 (a 4-point difference). Key differences: the Vivo Y32t has the bigger battery (5000 mAh vs 4500); the main camera is 13 MP vs 50 MP; the ZTE Axon 40 SE has NFC for contactless payments, the Vivo Y32t doesn't.
Vivo Y32t
ZTE Axon 40 SE
- Bigger battery: 5000 vs 4500 mAh
- Lighter: 179g vs 182g
- Longer battery life (36/100 vs 24/100)
- Better design/ergonomics (76/100 vs 72/100)
- Better main camera: 50MP vs 13MP
- Better camera (24/100 vs 0/100)
Comparing the Vivo Y32t vs the ZTE Axon 40 SE, the ZTE Axon 40 SE scores 4 points higher (15/100 vs 11/100). In the "camera" category, the ZTE Axon 40 SE leads (24/100 vs 0/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo Y32t leads (36/100 vs 24/100). In the "performance" category, both devices are on the same level — 0/100. In the "display" category, both devices are on the same level — 0/100. In the "camera" category, the ZTE Axon 40 SE notably outperforms the Vivo Y32t (24/100 vs 0/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo Y32t is a bit better (36/100 vs 24/100). In the "design" category, the Vivo Y32t and the ZTE Axon 40 SE are nearly equal (76/100 vs 72/100). In the "value for money" category, both devices are on the same level — 55/100.
| Specification | Vivo Y32t | ZTE Axon 40 SE | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | MediaTek Helio P70 () | Unisoc UMS512T T618 | |
| AnTuTu | — | — | |
| Geekbench Single | — | — | |
| Geekbench Multi | — | — | |
| Display | 6.5" LCD IPS | 6.7" AMOLED | |
| Resolution | 720x1600 | 1080x2400 | |
| Refresh rate | — | — | |
| Battery | 5000 mAh | 4500 mAh | |
| Charging | — | 5W | |
| Main camera | 13 MP | 50 MP | |
| Front camera | 8 MP | 8 MP | |
| RAM | — | 4GB | |
| Storage | 128GB / 256GB | 128GB | |
| OS | Android 11 Red Velvet Cake | Android 12, MyOS 12 | |
| NFC | no | yes | |
| Dimensions | 164.0×75.2×8.3 mm | 163.5×75.8×7.6 mm | |
| Weight | 179 g | 182 g | |
| Price | — | — |
Vivo Y32t
- Main: 13MP
- Front: 8MP
ZTE Axon 40 SE
- Main: 50MP f/f/1.8
- Front: 8MP
Vivo Y32t
- 6.5" LCD IPS
- Resolution: 720x1600
- Refresh rate: —
ZTE Axon 40 SE
- 6.7" AMOLED
- Resolution: 1080x2400
- Refresh rate: —
Vivo Y32t
- 5000 mAh
- No wireless charging
ZTE Axon 40 SE
- 4500 mAh
- Wired: 5W
- No wireless charging
performance
In the "performance" category, both devices are on the same level — 0/100.
display
In the "display" category, both devices are on the same level — 0/100.
camera
In the "camera" category, the ZTE Axon 40 SE notably outperforms the Vivo Y32t (24/100 vs 0/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Vivo Y32t is a bit better (36/100 vs 24/100).
design
In the "design" category, the Vivo Y32t and the ZTE Axon 40 SE are nearly equal (76/100 vs 72/100).
value for money
In the "value for money" category, both devices are on the same level — 55/100.
Which is better: the Vivo Y32t or the ZTE Axon 40 SE?
The ZTE Axon 40 SE edges out the Vivo Y32t by just 4 points — the two devices are very close in overall level.
What is the rating of the Vivo Y32t and the ZTE Axon 40 SE?
The Vivo Y32t has a MobileRank rating of 11/100, the ZTE Axon 40 SE — 15/100.
Which has the better camera: the Vivo Y32t or the ZTE Axon 40 SE?
The ZTE Axon 40 SE leads on camera score (24/100 vs 0/100).
Should you choose the Vivo Y32t over the ZTE Axon 40 SE?
The Vivo Y32t is a better fit for everyday use. The ZTE Axon 40 SE is a better fit for everyday use.