Vivo iQOO Z5 (2022) vs ZTE Axon 40 SE
The Vivo iQOO Z5 (2022) (2022) runs on the MediaTek Dimensity 1300, while the ZTE Axon 40 SE (2022) runs on the Unisoc UMS512T T618. By overall MobileRank rating, the Vivo iQOO Z5 (2022) leads — 31/100 vs 15/100 (a 16-point difference). Key differences: the Vivo iQOO Z5 (2022) has the bigger battery (6000 mAh vs 4500); the ZTE Axon 40 SE has NFC for contactless payments, the Vivo iQOO Z5 (2022) doesn't; the ZTE Axon 40 SE is noticeably lighter (182g vs 203g).
Vivo iQOO Z5 (2022)
ZTE Axon 40 SE
- Bigger battery: 6000 vs 4500 mAh
- Faster charging: 44W vs 5W
- Better camera (27/100 vs 24/100)
- Longer battery life (51/100 vs 24/100)
- Better display (100/100 vs 0/100)
- Lighter: 182g vs 203g
- Better design/ergonomics (72/100 vs 46/100)
Comparing the Vivo iQOO Z5 (2022) vs the ZTE Axon 40 SE, the Vivo iQOO Z5 (2022) scores 16 points higher (31/100 vs 15/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo iQOO Z5 (2022) leads (51/100 vs 24/100). In the "performance" category, both devices are on the same level — 0/100. In the "display" category, the Vivo iQOO Z5 (2022) significantly outperforms the ZTE Axon 40 SE (100/100 vs 0/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo iQOO Z5 (2022) and the ZTE Axon 40 SE are nearly equal (27/100 vs 24/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo iQOO Z5 (2022) notably outperforms the ZTE Axon 40 SE (51/100 vs 24/100). In the "design" category, the ZTE Axon 40 SE notably outperforms the Vivo iQOO Z5 (2022) (72/100 vs 46/100). In the "value for money" category, both devices are on the same level — 55/100.
| Specification | Vivo iQOO Z5 (2022) | ZTE Axon 40 SE | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | MediaTek Dimensity 1300 | Unisoc UMS512T T618 | |
| AnTuTu | — | — | |
| Geekbench Single | — | — | |
| Geekbench Multi | — | — | |
| Display | 6.6" IPS LCD | 6.7" AMOLED | |
| Resolution | 1080x2408 | 1080x2400 | |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | — | |
| Battery | 6000 mAh | 4500 mAh | |
| Charging | 44W | 5W | |
| Main camera | 50 MP | 50 MP | |
| Front camera | 16 MP | 8 MP | |
| RAM | 6GB / 8GB / 12GB | 4GB | |
| Storage | 128GB / 256GB / 512GB | 128GB | |
| OS | Android 12, Funtouch 12 | Android 12, MyOS 12 | |
| NFC | no | yes | |
| Dimensions | 163.9×75.3×9.2 mm | 163.5×75.8×7.6 mm | |
| Weight | 203 g | 182 g | |
| Price | — | — |
Vivo iQOO Z5 (2022)
- Main: 50MP f/f/1.8
- Front: 16MP
ZTE Axon 40 SE
- Main: 50MP f/f/1.8
- Front: 8MP
Vivo iQOO Z5 (2022)
- 6.6" IPS LCD
- Resolution: 1080x2408
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
ZTE Axon 40 SE
- 6.7" AMOLED
- Resolution: 1080x2400
- Refresh rate: —
Vivo iQOO Z5 (2022)
- 6000 mAh
- Wired: 44W
- No wireless charging
ZTE Axon 40 SE
- 4500 mAh
- Wired: 5W
- No wireless charging
performance
In the "performance" category, both devices are on the same level — 0/100.
display
In the "display" category, the Vivo iQOO Z5 (2022) significantly outperforms the ZTE Axon 40 SE (100/100 vs 0/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the Vivo iQOO Z5 (2022) and the ZTE Axon 40 SE are nearly equal (27/100 vs 24/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Vivo iQOO Z5 (2022) notably outperforms the ZTE Axon 40 SE (51/100 vs 24/100).
design
In the "design" category, the ZTE Axon 40 SE notably outperforms the Vivo iQOO Z5 (2022) (72/100 vs 46/100).
value for money
In the "value for money" category, both devices are on the same level — 55/100.
Which is better: the Vivo iQOO Z5 (2022) or the ZTE Axon 40 SE?
The Vivo iQOO Z5 (2022) is noticeably better than the ZTE Axon 40 SE — the overall rating gap is 16 points.
What is the rating of the Vivo iQOO Z5 (2022) and the ZTE Axon 40 SE?
The Vivo iQOO Z5 (2022) has a MobileRank rating of 31/100, the ZTE Axon 40 SE — 15/100.
Should you choose the Vivo iQOO Z5 (2022) over the ZTE Axon 40 SE?
The Vivo iQOO Z5 (2022) is a better fit for everyday use. The ZTE Axon 40 SE is a better fit for everyday use.